|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:833-835 |
 |
Clinical Outcome of
Guillain-Barré Syndrome in 108 Children
|
Sandip Sen, Anil Kumar,
Banasree Roy
From Dr BC Roy Postgraduate Institute of Pediatric Science,
Kolkata,West Bengal.
Correspondence to: Dr Banasree Roy, 19C/3, Abinash Chandra Banerjee
Lane,
Kolkata 700 010, West Bengal.
Email: [email protected]
Received: February 08, 2020;
Initial review: April 08, 2020;
Accepted: December 30, 2020.
Published online: January 28, 2021;
PII:S097475591600283
|
Objectives: To review the clinical outcome and
electrophysiologic characteristics of children with Guillain-Barré
syndrome (GBS) from Eastern India. Methods: The hospital records
of the children aged less than 12 years with a final diagnosis of GBS at
our hospital from November, 2015 to December, 2018 were reviewed.
Disabilities were assessed at 8-weeks and 6-month follow-up using Hughes
scale (0-6). Results: Demyelinating variety in 57 patients
(52.8%) was more common than the axonal variety (33.3%). 71.1% (32/45)
of GBS patients had recovered (scale 0,1) during the follow up period of
6 months. These included 67.7% (21/31) of the axonal variety and 78.6%
(11/14) of the demyelinating variety. Conclusion: Irrespective of
the severity, disability is less with the demyelinating variety as
compared with the axonal subtype.
Keywords: Acute Inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy,
Disability, Follow-up, Prognosis.
|
Guillain-Barré syndrome
(GBS) is presently
the most common cause of acute flaccid
paralysis in our country. Among children in
India and neighbouring areas, the axonal variety predominates
[1-5]; the demyelinating variety predominates in South America
[6], other parts of Asia [7-9] and Europe [10,11]. This
difference in subtypes across geographical areas is not clearly
understood [12]. Data on the common subtype in Eastern India is
lacking, including data on outcome as pertaining to its
subtypes, which this study attempts to address.
METHODS
This is a hospital record review conducted in
a pediatric tertiary care hospital between November, 2015 to
October, 2018. During this period, 144 children with acute
flaccid paralysis (AFP) were admitted, among whom, 108 were
diagnosed as GBS (Asbury and Cornblath criteria [13]), and
included in our study after excluding GBS variants (n=12),
hypokalemic periodic paralysis (n=4), transverse myelitis
(n=6), traumatic neuritis (n=2) and those who did
not give consent (n=12). Ethical clearance was obtained
from institutional ethics committee. Informed consent was taken
before enrolment. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was given
to all patients.
Nerve conduction study was done within 48
hours in 99 (91.7%) patients, after initial stabilization. All
the patients underwent stool examination for poliovirus
detection. Lumbar puncture was done in 102 (94.4%) patients in
the second week after disease onset. Hughes GBS disability grade
was applied to assess the outcome at eight weeks (n=66)
and six months (n=45) after discharge [14].
Statistical analysis: SPSS 24.0 and Graph
Pad Prism version 5 were used for analysis. Proportions were
compared by Chi-square test or Fischer exact test, as
appropriate. P value <0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.
RESULTS
A total of 108 cases (66 boys) of GBS in the
age range 1.2 to 10 years, median (IQR) age of 4.2 years (2 year
3 month - 5 year) were enrolled in the present study. Preceding
respiratory and gastrointestinal infections were found in 33.3%
(n=36) and 25% (n=27) children, respectively.
History of antecedent illness was present in 72 (66.7%) patients
including diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccination in
one child.
At presentation, there was quadriparesis in
8.3% and paraparesis in 27.8% of children. Ascending paralysis
was the most common mode of presentation in 99 (91.7%) children.
Maximum number of children (83.3%) reached peak disability
within two weeks of onset of symptoms. Areflexia was found in
94.4% children, and 19.4% and 25% showed facial weakness and
bulbar palsy, respectively. Dysautonomia presenting as excessive
sweating (n=18), hypertension (n=9), sinus
tachycardia (n=15), sinus bradycardia (n=6), sinus
arrhythmia (n=9) fluctuating blood pressure (n=6) and
postural hypo-tension (n=3) were seen in 47.2% (n=51)
of the patients. Sensory symptom was the first symptom in 66
(61.1%) patients as compared to motor symptoms in 42 (38.9%)
patients. The most common initial sensory symptom was
paresthesia (33.3%) in the form of pin and needle sensations,
burning sensation and itching. Among other initial sensory
presentations generalized muscles aches were found in 8.3% of
cases, numbness of legs in 5.5%, pain in the back and neck in
8.3%, and pain in legs in 5.5% cases. Pain at some time during
the illness was present in 86% of patients. In this study,
demyelinating pattern (AIDP) was seen in 52.8% (n=57),
axonal pattern in 33.3% (n=36); whereas, 5.6% (n=6)
had normal NCV pattern. In the axonal variety, there were 34
cases of acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) and two cases of
acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN).
Albumino-cytological dissociation was found in 54 (50%)
patients.
Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) care for
the management of dysautonomia and respiratory paralysis was
required in 54 patients. Mechanical ventilation for respiratory
failure was required in 24 (22.2%) patients, out of which nine
(8.3%) died during the acute phase of the illness. Dysautonomia,
bulbar involvement and diarrhea were associated with all of the
nine patients who died. The causes of death were cardiac arrest
in the context of dysautonomic syndrome in four patients,
ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in three patients, adult
respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in one, and sepsis in one
patient. The duration of ventilation was 2-64 days with a mean
of 20.12 days and the range of hospital stay was 2-74 days with
a mean of 16.5 days. During ventilation, one patient developed
pneumothorax, nine developed VAP and 19 patients (17.9%)
required tracheostomy.
Out of 108 patients, 99 were discharged but
only 66 (66.7%) patients were available for follow up at 8 weeks
after the onset of illness, and 45 patients after 6 months (Table
I). The reasons for not following up were amelioration of
weakness, minor sensory symptoms, distance from the hospital and
follow up at their nearby clinics. In the present study, three
patients developed chronic inflammatory demyelinating
polyneuropathy (CIDP) during the follow up period and were
treated with IVIG and steroids.
Table I Outcome at 8 Weeks and 6 Months Follow-up in Children With Guillain-Barré Syndrome
Disability scale |
Grade 0 |
Grade 1 |
Grade 2 |
Grade 3 |
At 8 wk (n=66) |
24 (36.4) |
16 (24.2) |
11 (16.7) |
15 (22.7) |
Axonal (n=46) |
15 |
12 |
8 |
11 |
Demyelinating (n=20) |
9 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
At 6 mo (n=45) |
21 (46.7) |
11 (24.4) |
10 (22.2) |
3 (6.7) |
Axonal ( n=31) |
13 |
8 |
7 |
3 |
Demyelinating (n=14) |
8 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
DISCUSSION
This is a single center study done in eastern
India which included 108 children with GBS and compared their
outcome at eight weeks and six months follow up. Of the 99
patients available for electrophysiological studies 52.8% had
the demyelinating subtype and 33.3% had the axonal variety.
In the present study, those having the axonal
variety had higher Hughes disability score at presentation, at
the peak of disease, on discharge and on follow up at eight
weeks and six months respectively. Axonal variety had a higher
incidence of GI symptoms in our study as well as other studies
[7,15] while antecedent upper respiratory illness was more
common in the demyelinating variety as also noted in few
previous studies [3,7,15]. The reasons why some infections are
more common in certain subtypes of GBS are not very clear.
In a study by Korinthenberg, et al. [10] on
95 children there was an improvement of 96% (91/95) (75% Grade 0
and 21% Grade 1) at the end of an observation period of 288
days. They had 74% of the demyelination subtype, which probably
explains their excellent outcome. Kalra, et al. [2] in their
studies in 52 children conducted in northern India revealed a
recovery rate of 87.5% at 1 year follow up and 95% thereafter.
In a study from southern India, Kannan, et al. [15] all 43
children recovered (Grade1,2) at 6 month follow up. They
reported a mix of axonal (44.2%) and demyelinating (48.8%)
subtypes. Recently Yadav, et al. [1] studied 36 children and
reported a recovery rate of 84.4% (27/32) (Grade 1,2) at 3 month
follow up. Their predominant subtype was the axonal variety
(69.4%). We had a higher number of axonal variety in follow up
as compared to the demyelinating subtype (31 vs 14). This was
probably due to persistence of weakness in axonal type which
also explains the poorer outcome of our study. Data has been
difficult to analyze as a few studies [1,15] have used a Hughes
disability score of 1 and 2 to discuss outcome while others
[2,10], including the present study, have used a score of 0 and
1. More meaningful comparisons could have been done if the same
disability scores were used. The overall prognosis in most
studies was excellent and it has been observed by most of the
studies that a longer duration of follow-up showed improved
disability ratings and scores [1,6,10].
The limitations of this study is being a
single center study, absence of a longer period of follow up and
insufficient numbers to draw strong conclusions correlating the
GBS subtype with the outcome. Demyelinating variety was more
common than the axonal subtype in this cohort. Presence of
gastrointestinal symptoms, bulbar palsy and respiratory failure
were suggestive of axonal subtype. At both 8 weeks and 6 months
follow-up, the demyelinating variety had a better outcome as
compared to the axonal variety.
Ethical approval: Institutional Ethics
Committee, Dr. BC Roy Post Graduate Institute of Paediatric
Sciences; No. BCH/ME/PR/2660B, dated September 25, 2017.
Contribution: SS,AK: concept and design
of study; AK,BR: acquisition of data; SS,AK: data analysis and
interpretation; SS,AK,BR: drafting of manuscript; SS,AK,BR:
critical revision of manuscript. All authors approved the final
version of manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest:
None stated.
REFERENCES
1. Yadav S, Jain P, Sharma S, Kumar V,
Aneja S. Guillain–Barre syndrome in North Indian children:
Clinical and serial electrophysiological features. Neurol
India. 2019;67:724-7.
2. Kalra V, Sankhyan N, Sharma S, Gulati
S, Choudhry R, Dhawan B. Outcome in childhood Guillain-Barré
syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2009;76:795.
3. Sankhyan N, Sharma S, Konanki R,
Gulati S. Childhood Guillain-Barré syndrome subtypes in
northern India. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21:427-30.
4. Islam Z, Jacobs BC, Van Belkum A, et
al. Axonal variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated
with Campylobacter infection in Bangladesh. Neurology.
2010;74:581-7.
5. Tang J, Dai Y, Li M, et al.
Guillain-Barré syndrome in Chinese children: A retrospective
analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 2011;45:233-7.
6. Paradiso G, Tripoli J, Galicchio S,
Fejerman N. Epidemiological, clinical, and electrodiagnostic
findings in childhood Guillain Barré syndrome: A
reappraisal. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:701-7.
7. Liu S, Xiao Z, Lou M, et al.
Guillain-Barré syndrome in southern China: Retrospective
analysis of hospitalised patients from 14 provinces in the
area south of the Huaihe River. J Neurol Neurosurg
Psychiatry. 2018;89:618-26.
8. Wu X, Shen D, Li T, et al. Distinct
clinical characteristics of pediatric Guillain-Barre
syndrome: A comparative study between children and adults in
Northeast China. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151611.
9. Asiri S, Altwaijri WA, Ba-Armah D, et
al. Prevalence and outcomes of Guillain-Barré syndrome among
pediatrics in Saudi Arabia: A 10-year retrospective study.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019;15:627-35.
10. Korinthenberg R, Schessl J, Kirschner
J. Clinical presentation and course of childhood
Guillain-Barré syndrome: A prospective multicentre study.
Neuro-pediatrics. 2007;38:10-17.
11. Korinthenberg R, Mönting JS. Natural
history and treatment effects in Guillain-Barré syndrome: A
multi-centre study. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:281-7.
12. Bae JS, Yuki N, Kuwabara S, et al.
Guillain–Barré syn-drome in Asia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych.
2014;85: 907-13.
13. Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment
of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Ann Neurol. 1990;27:S21-S24.
14. Hughes RA, Newsom-Davis JM, Perkin
GD, Pierce JM. Steroids in acute polyneuropathy. Lancet.
1978;2:1383.
15. Kannan MA, Ch RK, Jabeen S A, Mridula K R, Rao P,
Borgohain R. Clinical, electrophysiological subtypes and
antiganglioside antibodies in childhood Guillain-Barré syndrome.
Neurol India. 2011;59:727-32.
|
|
 |
|