|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52:
773-778 |
 |
Waist-to-Height Ratio as
an Indicator of High Blood Pressure in Urban Indian School
Children
|
PE Mishra, L
Shastri, #T
Thomas, *C
Duggan, ‡R
Bosch, *CM McDonald
, AV Kurpad and R Kuriyan
From St. John’s Medical College, and; Divisions of
#Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Nutrition, St. John’s Research
Institute; Bangalore, India;*Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology
and Nutrition, and Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA;
‡Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health; Boston,
MA, USA.
Correspondence to: Dr Rebecca Kuriyan, Division of
Nutrition, St. John’s Research Institute, Bangalore 560 034, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: December 05, 2014;
Initial review: December
30, 2014;
Accepted: July 15, 2015.
|
Objectives: To examine the utility of waist-to-height ratio
to identify risk of high blood pressure when compared to body mass index
and waist circumference in South Indian urban school children.
Design: Secondary data analysis from a
cross-sectional study.
Settings: Urban schools around Bangalore,
India.
Participants: 1913 children (58.1% males) aged
6-16 years with no prior history of chronic illness (PEACH study).
Methods: Height, weight, waist circumference and
of blood pressure were measured. Children with blood pressure
³90th
percentile of age-, sex-, and height-adjusted standards were labelled as
having high blood pressure.
Results: 13.9% had a high waist-to-height ratio,
15.1% were overweight /obese and 21.7% had high waist circumference.
High obesity indicators were associated with an increased risk of high
blood pressure. The adjusted risk ratios (95% CI) of high systolic blood
pressure with waist-to-height ratio, body mass index and waist
circumference were 2.48 (1.76, 3.47), 2.59 (1.66, 4.04) and 2.38 (1.74,
3.26), respectively. Similar results were seen with high diastolic blood
pressure.
Conclusion: Obesity indicators, especially
waist-to-height ratio due to its ease of measurement, can be useful
initial screening tools for risk of high blood pressure in urban Indian
school children.
Keywords: Anthropometry, Hypertension, Obesity, Risk.
|
H igh blood pressure, i.e. either high
systolic blood pressure (SBP) or high diastolic blood pressure (DBP), is
increasingly being reported in children [1-4]. Indian children are more
susceptible to obesity-mediated high blood pressure [5-7]. Also, as
elevated blood pressure tracks over time; children with high values are
at a higher risk of developing hypertension in adulthood [8].
Blood pressure measurements in children require
trained professionals to carry out and interpret the readings [9]. As
this may be difficult in a school-setting, the use of anthropometry,
carried out as part of a routine school physical examination, would be
beneficial to identify children at risk of high blood pressure. Commonly
used obesity indicators such as waist-to- height ratio (WHtR), body mass
index (BMI) and waist circumference (WC) have been examined as alternate
indicators of HBP in adults and children [10-14]. WHtR has been found to
be a simple, easy and accurate index, suitable as a screening tool for
obesity in children and adolescents from India [15]. However, studies on
the association between WHtR and childhood high blood pressure
[14,16,17], are unavailable for Indian children. The aim of the present
study was to examine the association of WHtR, BMI, and WC with high
blood pressure in urban children aged 6 to 16 years from Southern India.
Methods
Children in this cross-sectional observational study
were recruited as part of an ongoing cohort study, viz. Pediatric
Epidemiology and Child Health (PEACH) [15]. Convenient samples of
private schools in Bangalore, which cater to urban middle-class
families, were selected based on permission to carry out the study
during school hours. Healthy children between the ages of 6 to 16 years
with no significant clinical history or any chronic illnesses were
eligible to participate in the study. Children recruited from four
schools during the PEACH study period (August 2011 to March 2013), were
considered for inclusion in the present study. The study was approved by
the Institutional Ethical Review Board at St. John’s Medical College,
Bangalore. Of the 2495 students who were contacted, written informed
consent was obtained from either a parent/guardian of 1970 children.
From these, 1913 children who had two readings of BP and all
anthropometric measurements (height, weight and waist circumference)
were included for the current analysis. A sample size of 1010 children
was sufficient to examine an increased odds of 2.28 for hypertension
among children with WHtR ³0.5
when compared to those with WHtR <0.5, with 5% level of significance and
80% power [14].
Demographic data on date of birth, medical history,
birth weight, parental education, occupation, income, parental height
and weight were collected from the parents. The questionnaires used in
this study were used in the previous PEACH study [15], and have been
pre-tested to ensure that both the children and parents understood all
questions and provided reliable data. Comprehensive questionnaires
capturing physical activity patterns, tuition time (hours per week),
time spent in sedentary activities at home (watching television, playing
computer games) and average sleep duration per night were completed by
the parents of students below the 6th grade and by the students in the
6th grade and above. Physical activity patterns were assessed by asking
about time spent playing games outside school and the type of sports in
which the children regularly engaged.
Anthropometric measurements of body weight and height
were performed by trained staff using standardized procedures [18]. Body
weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a calibrated digital
scale (Tanita, Tokyo, Japan); children were asked to remove their shoes
and socks, and to change into light clothing. Height measurements were
taken to the nearest 0.1 cm using a portable stadiometer (Seca 213,
Germany); children were asked to remove shoes and socks. For measurement
of WC, children were asked to remain in a standing position and
measurements were taken using a non-stretchable tape during end-tidal
expiration, exerting the same standard pressure on the tape at the
midpoint of the lowest ribcage and the iliac crest [19]. WHtR was
calculated as WC (cm) divided by height (cm) for all children. BP
measurements were taken using a mercury sphygmomanometer as recommended
in American Heart Association guidelines [9]. Measurements were taken in
a quiet room while the child was sitting with their arm resting on a
table. Efforts were made to eliminate factors which may affect BP such
as anxiety, crying or prior exercise. The average of two consecutive
readings was used in the analysis. All BP measurements were taken by the
same trained professional.
The different sports and games reported were
classified into three categories (mild, moderate, vigorous) based on the
metabolic equivalent (MET) score [20]. Activities below 3 METS were
considered as light, 3-6 MET were considered as moderate, and greater
than 6 METS as vigorous. The total duration of physical activity (in MET
hours) was then calculated by multiplying the total duration of games
played in each category with its average MET score value. Time spent
watching television and time spent on the computer/video games was
grouped together as screen time.
Statistical analysis: Child’s age-and-sex
specific height percentiles were computed according to the CDC criteria
[21]. BP percentiles for each child were calculated according to
National Heart Lung and Brain Institute guidelines [22] based on the
child’s age, sex, and height percentile. All children with BP
³90th percentile for
SBP and ³90th
percentile for DBP were classified as high SBP or high DBP,
respectively. HBP was defined as either high SBP or high DBP. WHtR Z
scores were calculated using age-and-sex specific data for South Indian
children [15]. Children with a WHtR< 0.5 were defined as normal, whereas
a WHtR ³0.5
was labelled as high WHtR [11]. All children were also classified into 3
categories viz. underweight, normal, and overweight/obese, based on
their BMI according to the age- and sex-specific cut-offs recommended by
IOTF [23]. WC Z scores for all children were calculated using age- and
sex- specific data available for South Indian children. Children with WC
>75th percentile, i.e WC >0.67 Z score were considered to be at risk of
HBP [15].
The discriminative capacity of BMI Z scores, WC Z
scores and WHtR in their ability to determine high SBP and high DBP was
examined and compared by plotting the Receiver Operating Characteristic
(ROC) curves for each indicator and comparing the area under the curve
(AUC). The AUC of WHtR was compared with that of BMI and WC using a
previously described method [24].
The associations of WHtR Z score, BMI Z score and WC
Z score with systolic and diastolic BP percentiles were examined using
linear regression. Multi-variable models were constructed including all
potential covariates at P<0.10 in the bivariable analysis. Crude
and adjusted regression coefficients ( b)
along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) are reported
for the association of BP percentiles with WHtR, BMI, and WC.
The association of high WHtR, overweight/obese BMI
and high WC with high systolic and diastolic BP was examined using log
binomial regression. Multivariable log binomial models were constructed
with the same covariates as mentioned above. Crude (RR) and adjusted
risk ratios (ARR) are reported along with 95% CI. Each of these obesity
indicator was considered as independent variable in separate regression
analyses.
Two-sided P-values <0.05 were considered
statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS
program (version 9.2; SAS, Cary, N.C., USA) and SPSS (IBM SPSS
Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Log
binomial regression analysis was performed using the PROC GENMOD program
in SAS.
Results
A total of 1913 children (1111 males) were analyzed.
Mean age of the children was 12 years. The proportion of children with
high SBP and high DBP were 8.0% (108) and 2.7% (51) respectively. High
WHtR was observed in 14.1% (269) of the children, while 15.1% (289) were
overweight/obese and 21.7% (415) had a high WC. WHtR was strongly
correlated with BMI Z score and WC percentiles (r=0.89 and 0.74,
respectively, both P<0.001). Table I depicts the
demographic, behavioral and anthropometric characteristics along with
the BP of the children in the study.
TABLE I Demographic, Anthropometric and Behavioral Characteristics of Children (N=1913) in the Study
Characteristics |
Mean (SD) |
Population Characteristics |
Age (y) |
12 (3) |
#Male sex |
1111 (58.1%) |
Birth weight (kg) |
3.0 (0.6) |
Father’s BMI (kg.m-2) |
25.1 (5.3) |
Mother’s BMI (kg.m-2) |
25.4 (6.7) |
Anthropometry |
Height (cm) |
144.9 (14.9) |
Weight (kg) |
38.5 (13.3) |
Waist circumference Z score |
-0.25 (1.28) |
BMI Z score (kg.m-2) |
-0.12 (1.25) |
Waist-to-height ratio |
0.4 (0.1) |
Waist-to-height ratio Z score |
-0.32(1.37) |
Blood Pressure |
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) |
108 (8) |
Systolic BP percentile |
59.9 (23.2) |
#High systolic BP (≥90th percentile) |
153 (8.0%) |
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) |
60 (8) |
Diastolic BP percentile |
45.4 (22.3) |
#High diastolic BP (≥90th
percentile) |
51 (2.7%) |
Physical activity outside school |
*(MET hrs.week-1) n= 1850 |
21(46) |
*Screen time (hrs.week-1) n = 1549 |
9(9) |
*Tuition time (hrs.week-1) n = 1647 |
3(12) |
*Sleep duration (hrs.night-1) n = 1587 |
8(2) |
#No.(%); *Median (IQR). |
|
The multivariable linear regression model adjusted
for the following factors based on their significance in univariable
analysis with either/both BP percentiles: maternal BMI (P=0.091
DBP), screen time (P<0.001 SBP, P=0.001 DBP), tuition time
(P=0.021 SBP, P=0.040 DBP), physical activity (P=0.004
SBP, P=0.019 DBP) and sleep duration (P=0.010 DBP).
Similarly, log binomial regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and
sleep duration (P<0.001 SBP) based on univariable P
values. Age and sex were included in all models regardless of P
value as they directly affect BP.
TABLE II AUCs of Waist-to-Height Ratio, BMI and Waist Circumference for Risk of High Systolic or
Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) (N=1913)
Characteristics |
Area Under Curve (95% CI) |
|
High SBP |
High DBP |
Waist-to-height ratio |
0.64 (0.59-0.68) |
0.67 (0.59-0.75) |
BMI Z scores |
0.62 (0.57-0.67) |
0.69 (0.61-0.76) |
WC Z scores |
0.60 (0.55-0.65) |
0.65 (0.56- 0.73) |
BMI: Body mass indes; WC: Waist circumference: SBP: systolic
BP: DBP: diastolic BP. |
As shown in Table II, the AUCs of WHtR,
BMI and WC with respect to their ability to detect either high systolic
BP or high diastolic BP were statistically significant (P<0.001).
The AUC of WHtR for high systolic BP was slightly higher (P=0.025)
than that of WC but was comparable with that of BMI. The AUCs were all
comparable with each other for high diastolic BP. Multiple variable
linear regression of systolic BP percentiles with Z scores of WHtR, BMI
and WC showed that the regression coefficients were comparable for the
three obesity indicators ( b=4.93,
4.29 and 3.76, respectively). Similarly the regression coefficients were
comparable in the analysis of diastolic BP percentile (b=2.56,
2.35 and 2.32, respectively) (Table III).
TABLE III Linear Regression Analysis of Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Percentiles with
Waist-to-Height Ratio Z Scores, BMI Z Scores, Waist Circumference Z Scores
|
Systolic BP percentiles |
|
Diastolic BP percentiles |
|
Anthropometry |
Unadjusted (n=1913) |
Adjusted (n=1014) |
Unadjusted (n=1913) |
Adjusted (n=1014) |
Waist-to-height ratio Z scores |
4.02 (3.21-4.83) |
4.93 (3.92-5.95) |
2.38 (1.59-3.18) |
2.56 (1.50-3.63) |
BMI Z scores |
2.86 (2.10-3.61) |
4.29 (3.30-5.27) |
1.50 (0.78-2.23) |
2.35 (1.33-3.38) |
Waist circumference Z score |
3.05 (2.25-3.86) |
3.76 (2.71-4.80) |
2.05 (1.28-2.83) |
2.32 (1.25-3.40) |
All values are regression coefficient (95% CI). |
The increased risk of high BP with high WHtR was
confirmed using multivariable log binomial regression with ARR: 2.48
(95% CI: 1.76, 3.47) and ARR: 3.38 (95% CI: 1.81, 6.30) for high
systolic BP and high diastolic BP respectively, adjusting for age, sex
and sleep. The risk of high BP was comparable for all three obesity
indicators (Table IV). The sensitivity and specificity of
WHtR for high systolic and diastolic BP was 27.4% and 88.2%, and 35.3%
and 86.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of BMI and WC for high systolic
BP was 28.7% and 39.9%, and 33.3% and 50.1% for high diastolic BP. The
respective specificity values were 86.1% and 79.9% for high systolic BP,
and 85.4% and 79.1% for high diastolic BP.
TABLE IV Log Binomial Regression Analysis of High Systolic and High Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) Percentiles with
Waist-to-Height Ratio, BMI Z scores and Waist Circumference Z Scores.
|
High systolic BP (≥90th
percentile) |
High diastolic BP (≥90th
percentile) |
|
n/N (%) |
Unadjusted |
*Adjusted |
n/N (%) |
Unadjusted |
*Adjusted |
|
|
(n=1913) |
(n=1587) |
|
(n=1913) |
(n=1587) |
Waist to height ratio (≥0.5) |
42/269(15.6) |
2.33(1.67-3.24) |
2.48(1.76-3.47) |
18/269(6.6) |
3.36(1.92-5.88) |
3.38(1.81-6.30) |
BMI |
Underweight |
28/478(5.9) |
0.83(0.55-1.26) |
1.27(0.84-1.93) |
5/478(2.5) |
0.41(0.16-1.06) |
0.46(0.18-1.22) |
Overweight/ obese |
44/289(15.2) |
2.15(1.53-3.04) |
2.59(1.66-4.04) |
17/289(5.9) |
2.32(1.30-4.17) |
2.61(1.38-4.92) |
Waist circumference (> 0.67 Z score) |
61/415(14.7) |
2.37(1.74-3.21) |
2.38(1.74-3.26) |
26/415(6.3) |
3.71(2.16-6.35) |
3.88(2.13-7.06) |
All values are Risk Ratio (95% CI); *Adjusted for age, sex,
and sleep. |
Discussion
Our results showed statistically similar AUCs for
WHtR, BMI and WC in detecting risk of high BP, indicating similar
discriminatory ability for all three obesity indicators. Similar results
were seen with blood pressure percentile when considered as a continuum
in linear regression. The risk ratio of high BP was increased for all
three obesity indicators confirming the comparable discriminatory
ability of WHtR, BMI, and WC to detect high BP.
When compared to other studies, the AUC of WHtR was
comparable to that seen by Freedman, et al. [13], but was
slightly lower than that by Kuba, et al. [16]. This difference
may be due to higher prevalence of overweight /obese children in their
study population (49.7%) when compared to ours (15.1%). In addition, the
risk ratio is similar to the previously reported values in children aged
7-17 years having high BP [14].
Pediatric high BP is known to track over time,
possibly resulting in adult hypertension [8]; hence, early
identification and interventions to reduce BP must take place as early
as possible. Measuring BP, albeit the ideal method to identify high BP,
has certain difficulties. It requires trained personnel, appropriate
cuff size of sphygmomanometer, and must be taken in quiet surroundings
with a calm child; making routine school screening laborious, if not
impossible. A simple screening tool to identify children with high BP is
thus the need of the hour. Obesity indicators i.e. BMI, WC and
WHtR can serve as a surrogate for high BP as they require only simple
anthropometric measurements, which are a part of routine school physical
examination. Although BMI and WC do not have a single cut-off which can
be applied to all children, WHtR can be interpreted easily by well-
trained staff with no medical background [11]. However, as WHtR is only
a screening tool, all children identified with a WHtR
³0.5 must be referred
to a physician for confirmation and final diagnosis of high BP.
Some of the limitations of the present study were
that all readings were taken on the same day and there was no follow-up
to confirm hypertension. Additionally, since the dataset represents
urban children attending schools in Bangalore, these results need to be
tested in a more diverse setting, before they can be generalized to the
population of children in India. WHtR has a low sensitivity, and thus
some children may be missed by this initial screening tool. However, due
to its ease of administration with only a tape measure, simplicity of
measurement and application of a single cutpoint across all ages, we
suggest it be used as a simple screening tool in Indian populations
until a more sensitive tool can be found. Given the large sample size of
this study, with little inter-observer variation in BP readings, and the
consistency of results with available literature from other populations,
it is reasonable to conclude that simple anthropometric measures may be
used to initially screen school going children for risk of HBP in an
urban Indian setting. The WHtR has the added advantage of being easy to
calculate and interpret, and hence can be used widely during routine
school physical examination.
Acknowledgements: Deepa P Lokesh, Mamatha Philip,
Jini V Aravind, Jabin Dany Raj R, and Jayakumar J for help in data
collection. We acknowledge the contribution of schools and teachers for
their support.
Contributions: PEM, LS, TT, RK, AVK:
conceptualizing the study, analyzing data and writing the manuscript;
CD, RB, CMM: analyzing data and writing the manuscript. AVK: will be the
guarantor of the study. The final manuscript was approved by all
authors.
Funding: Some aspects of this study were
funded by ICMR grant no 5/4/8-10/NCD-II. The rest was funded by
intramural sources. Christopher Duggan was supported in part by
NIH/NICHD K24 HD058795.
Competing interests: None stated.
What is Already Known?
• Obesity is associated with high blood
pressure and there is a rising incidence of both in children.
What This Study Adds?
• Waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference
and body mass index have similar discriminatory ability in
detection of risk of high blood pressure in Indian children.
|
References
1. Luma GB, Spiotta RT. Hypertension in children and
adolescents. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73:1558-68.
2. Sorof J, Daniels S. Obesity hypertension in
children: a problem of epidemic proportions. Hypertension.
2002;40:441-7.
3. Raj M, Sundaram R, Paul M, Kumar K. Blood pressure
distribution in Indian children. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:477-85.
4. Genovesi S, Antolini L, Gallieni M, Aiello A, Mandal
SK, Doneda A, et al. High prevalence of hypertension in normal
and underweight Indian children. J Hypertens. 2011;29:217-21.
5. Prasad DS, Kabir Z, Dash AK, Das BC. Abdominal
obesity, an independent cardiovascular risk factor in Indian
subcontinent: A clinico epidemiological evidence summary. J Cardiovasc
Dis Res. 2011;2:199-205.
6. López-Jaramillo P, Velandia-Carrillo C,
Alvarez-Camacho J, Cohen DD, Sánchez-Solano T, Castillo-López G.
Inflammation and hypertension: Are there regional differences? Int J
Hypertens. 2013;2013:492094.
7. Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Coyaji KJ, Hirve SS, Rao
S, Barker DJ, et al. Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian
baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.
2003;27:173-180.
8. Chen X, Wang Y. Tracking of blood pressure from
childhood to adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis
regression. Circulation. 2008;117:3171-80.
9. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner
BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure
measurement in humans and experimental animals, Part 1: Blood pressure
measurement in humans: A statement for professionals from the
Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart
Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation.
2005;111:697-716.
10. Kim JY, Oh S, Chang MR, Cho YG, Park KH, Paek YJ,
et al. Comparability and utility of body composition measurement
vs. anthropometric measurement for assessing obesity related health
risks in Korean men. Int J Clin Pract. 2013;67:73-80.
11. McCarthy HD, Ashwell M. A study of central
fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over
two decades supports the simple message-’keep your waist circumference
to less than half your height’. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30:988-92.
12. Savva SC, Tornaritis M, Savva ME, Kourides Y, Panagi
A, Silikiotou N, et al. Waist circumference and waist-to-height
ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in
children than body mass index. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord.
2000;24:1453-8.
13. Freedman DS, Kahn HS, Mei Z, Grummer-Strawn LM,
Dietz WH, Srinivasan SR, et al. Relation of body mass index and
waist-to-height ratio to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children
and adolescents: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr.
2007;86:33-40.
14. Hu YH, Reilly KH, Liang YJ, Xi B, Liu
JT, Xu DJ, et al. Increase in body mass index, waist
circumference and waist-to-height ratios associated with high blood
pressure in children and adolescents in China. J Int Med
Res. 2011;39:23-32.
15. Kuriyan R, Thomas T, Lokesh DP, Sheth NR, Mahendra
A, Joy R, et al. Waist circumference and waist for height
percentiles in urban South Indian children aged 3-16 years. Indian
Pediatr. 2011;48:765-71.
16. Kuba VM, Leone C, Damiani D. Is waist-to-height
ratio a useful indicator of cardio-metabolic risk in 6-10-year-old
children? BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:91.
17. Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Heo M, Pietrobelli A.
Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body
mass index in children and adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond).
2013;37:943-6.
18. Gordon CC, Chumlea WC, Roche AF. Stature,
recumbent length, and weight. In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R, eds.
Anthropometric Standardization reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books,
Champaign, Illinois, 1988: p.3-8.
19. World Health Organization. Physical status: the
use and interpretation of anthropometry: a report of a WHO expert
committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452.
20. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin
ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical
activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci
Sports Exerc. 2000;32:S498-504.
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A SAS
program for the CDC growth charts. 2011. Available from:
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_246.pdf . Accessed
February 9, 2015
22. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. The
Fourth Report on the Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure in Children and Adolescents. National Institutes of Health. NIH
Publication No. 05-5267 Revised May 2005. Available from:
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/prof/heart/hbp/hbp_ped.pdf. Accessed
February 9, 2015.
23. Cole TJ, Lobstein T. Extended international
(IOTF) body mass index cut-offs for thinness, overweight and obesity.
Pediatr Obes. 2012;7:284-94.
24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method for comparing the
areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the
same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839-43.
|
|
 |
|