|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 733-737 |
 |
Risk of Pediatric Celiac Disease According to
HLA Haplotype and Country
|
Source Citation: Liu E, Lee H, Aronsson CA, Hagopian
WA, Koletzko S, Rewers MJ, et al., for the TEDDY Study Group. N Engl J
Med. 2014;doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1313977
Section Editor: Abhijeet Saha
|
Summary
This multi-centric cohort study [1] from four
countries followed a group of infants with the HLA haplotype DR3–DQ2 or
DR4–DQ8, from birth through the first few years of life; seeking the
appearance of antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) (labeled as
celiac disease autoimmunity), and development of celiac disease. This
was part of a larger study evaluating the development of type 1 diabetes
in a cohort of infants with genetic susceptibility (based on carrying
the HLA haplotype DR3-DQ2 or DR4-DQ8) [2]. Over a median follow-up
duration of nearly five years, the investigators reported 12% prevalence
of celiac disease autoimmunity and 3% prevalence of celiac disease. They
also identified that the respective risks of these two outcomes varied
by the HLA genotype: 26% and 11% with homozygosity for DR3-DQ2 haplotype;
11% and 3% with DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 haplotype; 8% and 3% with DR4-DQ8
homozygosity; and 3% and <1% among those with DR4-DQ8/DR8-DQ4 haplotype.
There was statistically significant higher risk of celiac disease
autoimmunity and celiac disease in infants from Europe (highest risk in
Sweden), female gender, and those with family history of celiac disease.
Commentaries
Evidence-based-medicine Viewpoint
Relevance: Data from developed countries
suggest celiac disease prevalence of 1% [3] in the general pediatric
population. A similar prevalence has been reported in India [4]. There
is significantly higher prevalence among those with type I diabetes
(3-10%) and family members of those with celiac disease (5-20%) [5-8].
HLA DQ2 and DQ8 are considered the most important genetic risk factor
for celiac disease; these haplotypes are present in nearly all patients
with celiac disease [9,10]. The absence of these haplotypes has very
high negative predictive value for celiac disease [11,12]. However,
HLA-DQ2 is present in about one-fourth to one-third of the unaffected
Caucasian population; hence it alone has low positive predictive value
[13], although combination with anti tTG IgA and endomysial antibody
(triple test) improves it to nearly 100% [14]. Against this background,
the cohort study [1] can be regarded as highly relevant. In the Indian
context, there is limited information that celiac disease is associated
with multiple DR3-DQ2 haplotypes [15,16] although population-based
studies are unavailable.
Critical appraisal: The Critical Appraisal
Skills Programme (CASP tool) [17] was used to evaluate this study (Table
I).
TABLE I Critical Appraisal of the Study Using the CASP Tool
A. Are the results of the study valid? |
Did the study address a clearly focused issue? |
This cohort
study has focused on a well-described population and risk factor
(infants with HLA haplotype DR3-DQ2 or DR4-DQ8), and clearly
defined outcomes (development of celiac disease autoimmunity and
disease). |
Did the authors use an appropriate method to answer their
question? |
A cohort study
with a reference group for comparison (infants without the risk
factor haplotype) would be appropriate to address the issue of
prevalence of autoimmunity and disease, compared to the
unexposed population. However, this study has focused only on
those with the haplotype (and its variants). |
Was the cohort recruited in an acceptable way? |
The cohort was
part of an ongoing study to determine the factors affecting type
I diabetes prevalence. From a potential cohort of over 21,500
eligible infants, the authors included over 8600. Among these
6403 infants carried one of the four haplotypes of interest to
this study and all were recruited. Thus there appears to be no
selection bias. |
Was the exposure accurately measured to minimize bias? |
Identification
of the relevant haplotypes and categorization into groups was
done objectively, although the methods are not described in
detail in this paper. However, it is expected that there
is limited risk of bias since no subjective methods were used to
identify or classify the haplotypes of interest. |
Was the outcome accurately measured to minimize bias? |
The two
outcomes of interest (autoimmunity and disease) were described
appropriately. The former was defined as the presence of anti
tTG antibodies on two consecutive occasions when measures
serially at 3 month intervals. Disease was defined by intestinal
biopsy or anti tTG antibody level >100 Units on two occasions.
These definitions are acceptable in routine clinical practice as
well as research settings. Laboratory measurements were
performed at two centres (one in US and the other in UK), using
internationally accepted methods for testing. In addition, the
UK laboratory served as the reference lab; where all samples
with anti tTG level higher than a certain value were re-tested.
Intestinal biopsy specimens were subject to histopathologic
grading using the standard Marsh score. These quality control
measures suggest a limited risk of measurement bias. However
there is no description of blinding of the laboratory personnel. |
Have the authors identified all important confounding factors?
List the ones you think might be important, that the authors
missed. |
The authors
have not described potential confounding factors. However,
previous data have shown that nearly 100% patients with celiac
disease have the haplotypes under consideration; although it is
present on 25-30% of the unaffected population also. Therefore,
it would have been very helpful to study the pattern of
development of autoimmunity and disease in a cohort without the
haplotypes of interest, although this would require a very large
and expensive study. |
Was the follow up of complete enough and long enough?
|
The authors
reported a median follow-up duration of five year. Although,
they did not mention attrition, only 350 of the 786 eligible
children underwent biopsy to confirm the diagnosis of celiac
disease. This was at the discretion of the primary physicians
and not related to the study per se. |
B. What are the results? |
What are the results of this study? |
Celiac disease
autoimmunity and disease varied by haplotype. DR3-DQ2/ DR3-DQ2:
26% and 11%; DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8: 11% and 3%; DR4-DQ8/ DR4-DQ8 8%
and 3%; DR4-DQ8/DR8-DQ4: 3% and <1%. Respective relative risk:
in Sweden (vs USA): 1.90 (1.61, 2.25) and 1.86 (1.43, 2.41);
female (vs male): 1.64 (1.42, 1.89) and 2.16 (1.71, 2.72);
and with family history of celiac disease (vs no history): 1.81
(1.31, 2.50) and 2.95 (1.95, 4.46). However, this study was not
designed to calculate the risk among those not exposed to the
four haplotypes. |
How precise are the results? How precise is the estimate
of the risk? |
In comparison
to people with lowest risk categort (i.e DR4-DQ8 heterozygosity),
DR3-DQ2 homozygosity is associated with relative risk of 5.70
(95% CI 4.66, 6.97) for autoimmunity and 6.08 (95% CI 4.43,
8.36) for disease. The respective risk ratios for DR3-DQ2
heterozygosity are 2.09 (95%CI 1.70, 2.56) and 1.66 (1.18,
2.33). |
Do you believe the results? |
These results
are in line with other reports that suggest association between
celiac disease and specific haplotypes. The added information is
the rate of development of celiac disease autoimmunity and
disease during the first five years of life, in a cohort of
at-risk infants followed up from birth. |
C. Will the results help me locally? |
Can the results be applied to the local population? |
This study in
included infants from four typically Caucasian countries
although there was no restriction on the ethnicity of enrolled
infants. There was a clear difference (in the prevalence of
celiac disease autoimmunity and disease) among those from
different countries (with European infants) showing trend
towards higher prevalence. There is limited information of
celiac disease prevalence and haplotype characteristics in
Indian population; and the results of this study cannot be
directly extrapolated. |
Do the results of this study fit with other |
Yes |
Extendibility: Some authors have sought to
identify whether the HLA loci associated with celiac disease in
Caucasian (European) population is similar in other ethnic groups. In a
cohort of North Indian people, three of the several loci seen in
Europeans, were observed to show strong association [18]. However other
authors have suggested that there are three sets of HLA-DR3 haplotypes
associated with development of type 1 diabetes [19]. Although the B8-DR3
haplotype confers the highest risk, there is considerable diversity of
this haplotype in Indians unlike the single fixed haplotype observed in
Caucasians [20]. These data suggest that while the results of the
multi-centric cohort study may be relevant to India, the data cannot be
directly extrapolated.
Conclusions: This cohort study suggests
that infants with certain HLA haplotypes (especially DR3-DQ2
homozygosity) have higher risk for development of celiac disease
autoimmunity and biopsy proven disease (compared to other haplotypes
also associated with celiac disease). There are ethnic and gender
variations, and family history confers increased risk.
Joseph L Mathew
Department of Pediatrics,
PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Pediatric Gastroenterologist’s Viewpoint
Celiac disease (CD) results from a dysregulated
immune response to dietary wheat and related cereal proteins. This
disease has gained importance from its HLA-linked genetic basis as
evident by ethnic and racial clustering, familial aggregation, twin
concordance, strong association with certain syndromes, and
autoimmunity. Many environmental factors, non-HLA linked genetics
(innate, adaptive and mucosal barrier) and recently early childhood
intestinal microbiota dysbiosis have also been implicated in the
development of this disease [21]. However HLA-linked genetics and its
"gene-dose effect" continue to be the stronghold of the etiopathogenesis
and thus its utility as an aid in screening and diagnosis of CD [22].
Virtually all CD patients express HLA-DQ2 or DQ8
class II molecules that bind and present gluten peptides derived from
exogenous protein antigens. These antigens are endocytosed by HLA class
II positive antigen-presenting cells and degraded in an intracellular
endosomal/ lysosomal compartment forming HLA class II-peptide complexes
that are recognized by peptide-specific T cells [23]. What follows
thereafter is a cascade of inflammation, villous atrophy and triggering
of autoimmunity that makes the disease clinically evident.
Over the years, management of CD focused on
withdrawal of gluten in diagnosed patients. However recently there has
been a paradigm shift in expanding the scope of diagnosing CD early by
screening high-risk groups. These high risk groups are: a)
non-autoimmune first-degree relatives, selective IgA deficiency, Down
syndrome, William’s syndrome and Turner syndrome); and b) autoimmune
(type 1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune thyroiditis and Sjorgen syndrome).
The scope has been further enhanced by screening subjects with non-
gastrointestinal conditions like dermatitis herpetiformis, delayed
puberty, short stature, iron deficiency anemia, osteoporosis, arthritis,
ataxia, polyneuropathy, dental enamel hypoplasia and recurrent
abortions.
The study being analyzed here is a prospective
longitudinal study that sheds light on relationship of HLA typing (both
homozygous and heterozygous) and celiac autoimmunity (development of
serum tissue transglutaminase antibodies twice at least 3 months apart)
and CD (serology plus small bowel biopsy features) [1]. Of 786 subjects
with CD autoimmunity, small bowel biopsy was possible in 350 and CD was
confirmed in 83% (n=291) children. The major caveat in this
robust study is that biopsy could not be performed in 436 subjects with
tTG positivity. This may have resulted in underestimation of CD or
overestimation as 21 out of 436 subjects were clubbed and presumed to be
CD based only on high levels (>100 U) of tTG. It was additionally found
that 1% of CD autoimmunity and 2% of diseased individuals developed Type
1 diabetes mellitus on follow-up where the community prevalence of
diabetes mellitus is 0.3% [1].
The researchers also found that amongst the 4
countries, Sweden had the highest risk of CD or CD autoimmunity, almost
double that of USA. The authors have attributed this phenomenon to
non-genetic, dietary factors. The interplay between breastfeeding and
early introduction of wheat during supplementation has been projected as
crucial and complex. In an unpublished study the authors cited, the
Swedish children were exclusively breastfed for a longer duration
(median 4 weeks) as compared to those in USA (median 1 week). However,
Swedish children were given gluten-containing cereals at the earlier age
as compared to USA [1]. Possibly we could interpret that breastfeeding
may be protective. It is prudent to breastfeed children longer and
gluten-containing diet may be introduced later during infancy (our view
point). Thus the study highlights role of environmental factors besides
genetic susceptibility in causation of CD.
How is this study relevant for India? In North India,
a population prevalence of 0.32% (1:310) of symptomatic CD in
school-going children and an overall community prevalence of 1% is
reported. The prevalence of biopsy-proven CD including tTG positivity
and autoimmunity (serology-positive alone) in first-degree relatives is
4.4%. and 9.8% respectively [24]. Though the DR3 allele frequency of
11.6-14.9% is similar in North and South India, a major difference in
DQ2 allele frequency exists between the two regions; in North India it
is 32%, and in South India it is 13% for Piramalai Kallars and 9%
for Yadhavas [25]. The prevalence is likely to rise in South
India in the near future due to current trends of population mixing. In
North Indians with CD, HLA DQ2 is prevalent in 93-97%. None of the
studies could demonstrate DQ8-positivity [25]. European susceptibility
patterns in India are similar in terms of HLA DQ2. The burden and
morbidity of CD in India is enormous. Results of the above study
[1] cannot be applied at population level in India
as the authors have used genetically susceptible group as an entry
criteria.
In high-risk groups as stated above, screening with
HLA may be considered. Those who are HLA predisposed (especially HLA DQ2
homozygous) must be followed up with tTG serology screening as
HLA-positivity does not mean CD. Negative tTG must be coupled with serum
IgA to rule out IgA deficiency (level <5 mg/dL). Those who are tTG
positive or IgA deficient must undergo small bowel biopsy. In Indian
situations, cost is a major consideration for HLA typing as a first line
screening among high risk groups. Therefore the option of either HLA
first followed by serial tTG strategy or only serial serology testing on
follow-up are the alternatives available [24]. Small bowel biopsy even
today for diagnosing CD seems to be mandatory in India (authors’
viewpoint). Breastfeeding needs to be re-emphasized and awareness
further strengthened by various campaigns.
Nevertheless, this study by Liu, et al. has
knocked the door that opens into a whole new frontier of CD. It is time
we take lessons, ponder upon and surge ahead!
SK Yachha and Moinak Sen Sarma
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology,
SGPGI, Lucknow, India
Email:
[email protected]
Immunogeneticist’s Viewpoint
Majority of patients with Celiac disease (CD)
worldwide possess HLA-DR3-DQ2 haplotype while a few carry DR4-DQ8 or
others. This paper by Liu, et al. [1], describes a well-planned
prospective cohort study on children CD that has re-established the
importance of HLA-DQ2 as a crucial risk factor both for development of
CD autoimmunity as well as phenotypic manifestation of disease at an
early age. This study has also affirmed that presence of double copies
of HLA-DQ2 offers a greater risk for both the above outcomes than a
single copy of DQ2 and is also associated with the earliest onset.
HLA-DQ2 association has a high negative predictive
value and its absence makes the possibility of CD highly unlikely. Among
various HLA-DQ2 heterodimers, DQ2.5 (DQA1*05:01+DQB1*02:01) confers the
greatest risk, particularly in homozygosity; followed by DQ2.2
(DQA1*02:01 + DQB1*02:02) whether in heterozygous condition with DQ2.5
or in homozygosity. The authors studied presence of such HLA class II
haplotypes amongst children of various origins (USA, Finland, Germany
and Sweden) and shown that cumulative risk of CDA and CD was highest
among children with DR3-DQ2/ DR3-DQ2 homozygotes followed by
DR3-DQ2/DR4-DQ8 and DR4-DQ8/DR8-DQ4 haplotypes in descending order. The
risk of CD autoimmunity was higher among children who had first degree
relations with CD than with type 1 diabetes. The female predominance of
CD autoimmunity was also evident in this study. Further, it is reported
that risk of CD autoimmunity in Sweden was almost twice that of USA and
that it developed at an earlier age despite haplotype matching. The
authors attribute this difference to multiple environmental factors
including interplay between breastfeeding and gluten exposure, age at
which gluten was introduced in child’s diet and the probable type of
infections, all of which are important in development of CD. Based on
the above, the authors recommend initiation of screening for CD in
at-risk children for an early diagnosis and the need to further
investigate the intricate relationships between genetic ad environmental
factors that may modulate development of CD in early childhood.
The DR3-DQ2 genomic segment of MHC is most commonly
found as an integral component of the ancestral MHC haplotype AH8.1
i.e. the classical HLA-A1-B8-DR3 haplotype amongst the Caucasians.
The extended DR3-DQ2 haplotypes in the Indian population are in contrast
multiple and very different from the classical Caucasian AH8.1. The
Indian DR3-DQ2 haplotypes are unique at numerous intermittent loci, are
associated with CD and other autoimmune diseases. The significance of
evolutionary divergence of such autoimmunogenic DR3-DQ2 haplotypes in
the Indian population is not well understood. The possibility of
association of different forms of DR3-DQ2 haplotypes with different
disease variants of CD or T1D also remains to be determined. It is still
an open question whether such haplotypes could be differently correlated
with spectral phenotypes of CD i.e. GI symptomatic vs atypical symptoms
vs no symptoms (Silent CD) or with no duodenal pathology (Latent CD)
forms. Incidentally, HLA-DQ2 is the same genetic marker that is
considered to be an important marker of un-responsiveness to HBV vaccine
among the Caucasians but there is paucity of data on Indian population
and it is not known if HBV response is compromised among Indian CD
patients. Hence, MHC haplotypic associations need further elucidation
particularly in conjunction with different disease forms in the Indian
population and in comparison with analogous counterparts in other
populations.
Gurvinder Kaur
Department of Transplant Immunology and Immunogenetics
AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Email:
[email protected]
References
1. Liu E, Lee H, Aronsson CA, Hagopian WA, Koletzko
S, Rewers MJ, et al. Risk of pediatric celiac disease according
to HLA haplotype and country. New Engl J Med. 2014; 371:42-49.
2. Hagopian WA, Erlich H, Lernmark A. The
Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDY): Genetic
criteria and international diabetes risk screening of 421000 infants.
Pediatr Diabetes. 2011;12:733-43.
3. Murch S, Jenkins H, Auth M, Bremner R, Butt A,
France S, et al. Joint BSPGHAN and Coeliac UK guidelines for the
diagnosis and management of coeliac disease in children. Arch Dis Child.
2013;98:806-11.
4. Makharia GK, Verma AK, Amarchand R, Bhatnagar S,
Das P, Goswami A, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in the
northern part of India: A community based study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
2011;26:894-900.
5. Dube C, Rostom A, Sy R, Cranney A, Saloojee N,
Garritty C, et al. The prevalence of celiac disease in
average-risk and at-risk Western European populations: A systematic
review. Gastroenterology 2005;128:S57-67.
6. Holmes GK. Screening for coeliac disease in type 1
diabetes. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87:495-8.
7. Atherton R, Ross A, Jessop F, Williams R,
Heuschkel R, Zilbauer M. Coeliac disease in children with type 1
diabetes - Are current guidelines proving difficult to implement in
practice? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2014 Jul 23. [Epub ahead of
print].
8. Rubio-Tapia A, Van Dyke CT, Lahr BD, Zinsmeister
AR, El-Youssef M, Moore SB, et al. Predictors of family risk for
celiac disease: A population based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008; 6: 983-7.
9. Sollid LM, Thorsby E. The primary association of
celiac disease to a given HLA-DQ alpha/beta heterodimer explains the
divergent HLA-DR associations observed in various Caucasian populations.
Tissue Antigens. 1990;36:136-7.
10. Sollid LM, Markussen G, Ek J, Gjerde H, Vartdal
F, Thorsby E. Evidence for a primary association of celiac disease to a
particular HLA-DQ alpha/beta heterodimer. J Exp Med. 1989;169:345-50.
11. Hadithi M, von Blomberg BM, Crusius JB, Bloemena
E, Kostense PJ, Meijer JW, et al. Accuracy of serologic tests and
HLA-DQ typing for diagnosing celiac disease. Ann Intern Med.
2007;147:294-302.
12. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR, Mearin
ML, Phillips A, Shamir R, et al. European Society for Pediatric
Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis
of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54:136-60.
13. Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH,
Murray JA; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical
guidelines: Diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J
Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656-76.
14. Klapp G, Masip E, Bolonio M, Donat E, Polo B,
Ramos D, et al. Celiac disease: The new proposed ESPGHAN
diagnostic criteria do work well in a selected population. J Pediatr
Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;56:251-6.
15. Yachha SK, Poddar U. Celiac disease in India.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2007;26:230-7.
16. Kaur G, Sarkar N, Bhatnagar S, Kumar S, Rapthap
CC, Bhan MK, et al. Pediatric celiac disease in India is
associated with multiple DR3-DQ2 haplotypes. Hum Immunol.
2002;63:677-82.
17. No authors listed. Critical Appraisal Skills
Programme. 12 questions to help you make sense of a cohort study.
Available from: http://www.caspinternational.org/mod_
product/uploads/CASP_Cohort_Studies_Checklist_ 14.10.10.pdf.
Accessed August 16, 2014.
18. Senapati S, Gutierrez-Achury J, Sood A, Midha V,
Szperl A, Romanos J, et al. Evaluation of European coeliac
disease risk variants in a north Indian population. Eur J Hum Genet.
2014 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2014.137. [Epub ahead of print]
19. Kumar N, Kaur G, Tandon N, Kanga U, Mehra NK.
Genomic evaluation of HLA-DR3+ haplotypes associated with type 1
diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1283:91-6.
20. Kaur G, Kumar N, Szilagyi A, Blasko B, Fust G,
Rajczy K, et al. Autoimmune-associated HLA-B8-DR3 haplotypes in
Asian Indians are unique in C4 complement gene copy numbers and HSP-2
1267A/G. Hum Immunol. 2008;69:580-7.
21. Olivares M, Neef A, Castillejo G, Palma GD, Varea
V, Capilla A, et al. The HLA-DQ2 genotype selects for early
intestinal microbiota composition in infants at high risk of developing
coeliac disease. Gut. 2014;Jun 17:doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306931. [Epub
ahead of print]
22. Murray JA, Moore, SB, Van Dyke CT, Lahr BD,
Dierkhising RA, Zinsmeister AR, et al. HLA DQ gene dosage and
risk and severity of celiac disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2007;5:1406-12.
23. Van de Wal Y, Kooy Y, Van Veelen P, Vader W,
Koning F, Peña S. Coeliac disease: it takes three to tango! Gut.
2000;46:734-7.
24. Srivastava A, Yachha SK, Mathias A, Parveen F,
Poddar U, Agrawal S. Prevalence, human leukocyte antigen typing and
strategy for screening among Asian first-degree relatives of children
with celiac disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:319-24.
25. Yachha SK. Celiac disease: India on the global map. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1511-3.
|
|
 |
|