|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 723-726 |
 |
Longitudinal Growth and Post-discharge
Mortality and Morbidity Among Extremely
Low Birth Weight Neonates
|
Kanya Mukhopadhyay, Deepak Louis, Gagan Mahajan and Rama Mahajan
From Neonatal Unit, Department of Pediatrics,
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh,
India
Correspondence to: Dr Kanya Mukhopadhyay, Additional
Professor (Neonatology), Department of Pediatrics, PGIMER, Chandigarh
160 012, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: January 27, 2014;
Initial review; March 31, 2014;
Accepted: July 21, 2014
|
Objectives: To study
post-discharge growth, mortality and morbidity of extremely low birth
weight neonates at corrected age of 2 years. Methods:
Weight, length and head circumference were compared on WHO growth charts
at corrected ages 3 (n=54), 6, 9, 12 (n=51) and 24 months
(n=37); rates of underweight, stunting, microcephaly and wasting
were calculated. Results: The mean Z-score for weight, length,
head circumference and weight-for-length significantly improved from 3
to 24 months (P<0.001); a significant proportion remained
malnourished at 2 years. Nine infants (11%) died and 35 (44%) required
re-admission during first year of age. Conclusion: Extremely low
birth weight neonates remain significantly growth retarded at corrected
age of 2 years.
Keywords: Low birth weight, Neonate, Outcome,
Protein energy malnutrition.
|
R ecent advances in neonatal care have resulted in
improved survival of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) neonates. These
babies are prone for significant growth failure during infancy [1,2]. An
ELBW Taiwan cohort reported significant delay in weight, length and head
circumference (HC) till corrected age of 2 years [3]. Sharma, et al.
[4] reported a subgroup of ELBW neonates who were undernourished and
microcephalic; two-thirds remained stunted at corrected age of 18 months
[4]. We previously reported poor growth among VLBW infants with
two-thirds being underweight and stunted, and nearly 50% having
microcephaly and wasting at 1 year of corrected age [5]. In addition,
ELBW infants have significant post-discharge morbidities and mortality
[6]. Indian data on growth as well as post-discharge death and
readmission rate are lacking.
Methods
This study was conducted over a period of 4 years in
the follow-up clinic of a level III neonatal unit in Northern India. All
consecutively born ELBW neonates (birth weight <1000 g) between
2009-2011, who were discharged alive from the hospital were enrolled
after written informed consent from parents, and followed up till 2
years of corrected age. Infants with major congenital malformations and
chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. The morbidities during hospital
stay and survival till discharge of this cohort have been previously
published [7]. This cohort was followed up at corrected age of 3, 6, 9,
12 and 24 months. During each visit, growth (weight, length and HC) was
assessed. All anthropometric parameters were plotted on the WHO multi-center
growth reference study (MGRS) charts using the WHO software and their
Z-scores were calculated [8]. Underweight was defined as weight <-2SD,
stunting as length <-2SD, microcephaly as HC <-2SD and wasting as
weight-for-length <-2SD. In lost to follow-up cases, we tried to contact
through telephone and our research staff made home visits to local
families. Institutional Ethics committee approved the study.
Small for gestational age (SGA) status was assigned
using Lubchenco’s intrauterine growth charts [9]. Bronchopulomonary
dysplasia (BPD) was defined as the need for oxygen for
≤28 days. Necrotizing
enterocolitis was classified using modified Bell’s criteria [10].
Diagnosis at readmission in our hospital was as per standard protocol,
and for admissions outside the hospital, the diagnosis was obtained from
patients’ records.
Primary outcome was proportion of underweight at
corrected age of 2 years. Secondary outcomes were proportion of
stunting, microcephaly and wasting at corrected age of 2 years, and
mortality and morbidity during first year of age.
Student t-test was used to compare means and
chi-square test to compare the proportions. Demographic and growth
variables till 3 months were compared between those who had poor growth
and those with normal growth at chronological age 1 year. The factors
which emerged significant (P<0.01) on univariate analysis were
then entered in to a multivariate binomial logistic regression model
using forward LR, stepwise fashion to identify factors predictive of
malnutrition at corrected age of 12 months. A P value of <0.05
was considered significant.
Results
Of the 149 ELBW neonates admitted to the NICU, 79
were discharged alive. Mean gestational age and birth weight were 29.9
(2.3) weeks and 872 (82) g, respectively. Fifty-one (64.5%) were SGA and
41 (52%) were males. The mean (SD) postnatal age and weight at discharge
were 46 (19) days and 1440 (289)g, respectively, and the post-conceptional
age was 36.9 (2.3) weeks. Follow-up could be completed in 54 children at
3 months (±1 week), 51 at 6, 9 and 12 months (±2 weeks) and 37 corrected
age of 24 months (±1 month) (14 lost). The growth pattern as per
gestation subcategories is shown in Table I. At corrected
age of 1 year, growth was below 3rd centile in 60% infants for weight,
49% for length and 61% for HC. Overall, Z-scores for weight and HC
improved significantly from 3 months to 2 years whereas that for length
improved from 3 to 12 months, but had a slight decline at 24 months.
Weight-for-length scores declined from 3 to 9 months, plateaued between
9 and 12 months, and thereafter increased till 2 years (Fig. 1).
At corrected age of 2 years, 41%, 68%, 32% and 19% children remained
underweight, stunted, microcephalic and wasted, respectively. There was
no difference between growth of SGA and appropriate for gestational age
(AGA) children (Table II).
TABLE I Gestational Age Wise Growth of ELBW Neonates Till 2 Years of Corrected Age
Variables
|
Gestational
age category (wk) |
|
<28
|
28-29
|
>30
|
Live births (n) |
42 |
46 |
61 |
Discharged alive (n) |
10 |
26 |
43 |
Gestational age (wks) |
26.2 (0.8) |
28.7 (0.5) |
31.6 (1.6) |
SGA (n, %) |
2 (20%) |
10 (39%) |
39 (91%) |
3 mo (n=54) Z scores |
WFA
|
-3.4 (1.1) |
-3.4 (1.2) |
-4.4 (1.2) |
LFA
|
-3.0 (1.5) |
-3.5 (1.7) |
-4.4 (1.3) |
HFA
|
-2.6 (1.0) |
-2.2 ( 0.9) |
-2.9 (1.3) |
WFL
|
-1.2 (0.9) |
-0.4 (1.6) |
-0.8 (1.9) |
6 mo (n=51) Z scores |
WFA
|
-2.9 (1.0) |
-2.3 (1.3) |
-3.3 (1.4) |
LFA
|
-2.8 ( 1.2) |
-2.5 (1.3) |
-3.6 (1.4) |
HFA
|
-2.3 ( 0.9) |
-1.7 (0.9) |
-2.2 (1.3) |
WFL
|
-1.6 ( 1.2) |
-0.8 (0.9) |
-1.2 (1.4) |
9 mo (n=51) Z scores |
WFA
|
-2.7 (1.1) |
-2.1 (1.3) |
-2.6 (1.5) |
LFA
|
-2.6 (0.9) |
-2.2 (1.1) |
-2.6 (1.4) |
HFA
|
-2.0 (0.7) |
-1.7 (1.1) |
-1.9 (1.2) |
WFL
|
-1.6 (1.1) |
-1.1 (1.1) |
-1.7 (1.5) |
12 mo (n=51) Z scores |
WFA
|
-2.2 (0.9) |
-2.0 (1.1) |
-2.3 (1.7) |
LFA
|
-2.1 (1.2) |
-2.1 (1.0) |
-2.5 (1.2) |
HFA
|
-1.9 (0.7) |
-1.7 (1.1) |
-1.9 (1.2) |
WFL
|
-1.6 (0.4) |
-1.4 (1.5) |
-1.4 (1.7) |
24 mo (n=37) Z scores |
WFA
|
-1.5 (0.4) |
-1.6 (1.2) |
-2.1 (1.4) |
LFA
|
-2.6 (0.5) |
-2.2 (1.1) |
-2.5 (1.3) |
HFA
|
-0.8 (0.8) |
-1.7 (1.2) |
-1.7 (1.1) |
WFL
|
-0.1 (0.2) |
-0.6 (1.1) |
-1.1 (1.4) |
Values are expressed as Mean (SD) unless specified;
SGA-small for gestational age, WFA-weight for age, LFA-length
for age, HFA-head circumference for age, WFL-weight for length. |
TABLE II Growth of ELBW Neonates Till 2 Years of Corrected Age in SGA vs AGA
Variables |
SGA (N=51) |
AGA (N=28) |
P value |
3 mo |
n=36 |
n=18 |
|
WFA z score |
-4.1 (1.3) |
-3.9 (1.3) |
0.68 |
LFA z score |
-4.2 (1.5) |
-3.5 (1.4) |
0.19 |
HFA z score |
-2.6 (1.1) |
-2.6 (1.3) |
0.99 |
WFL z score |
-0.7 (1.7) |
-0.5 (1.7) |
0.67 |
6 mo |
n=31 |
n=20 |
|
WFA z score |
-3.1 (1.7) |
-3.1 (1.0) |
0.94 |
LFA z score |
-3.1 (1.6) |
-3.2 (1.1) |
0.89 |
HFA z score |
-2.0 (1.1) |
-2.1 (1.1) |
0.71 |
WFL z score |
-1.3 (1.2) |
-1.3 (1.0) |
0.91 |
9 mo |
n=32 |
n=19 |
|
WFA z score |
-2.4 (1.5) |
-2.8 (1.1) |
0.35 |
LFA z score |
-2.5 (1.2) |
-2.6 (0.8) |
0.73 |
HFA z score |
-2.0 (1.0) |
-2.1 (1.0) |
0.67 |
WFL z score |
-1.4 (1.5) |
-1.7 (0.9) |
0.58 |
12 mo |
n=31 |
n=20 |
|
WFA z score |
-2.2 (1.5) |
-2.6 (1.0) |
0.40 |
LFA z score |
-2.4 (1.2) |
-2.3 (1.1) |
0.77 |
HFA z score |
-1.9 (1.0) |
-2.1 (1.1) |
0.63 |
WFL z score |
-1.3 (1.6) |
-1.9 (0.9) |
0.20 |
24 mo |
n=23 |
n=14 |
|
WFA z score |
-1.9 (1.5) |
-1.7 (1.2) |
0.78 |
LFA z score |
-2.5 (1.4) |
-2.4 (1.0) |
0.90 |
HFA z score |
-1.6 (1.0) |
-1.7 (1.3) |
0.98 |
WFL z score |
-0.8 (1.4) |
-0.7 (1.1) |
0.80 |
Values are expressed as Mean (SD); SGA-small for gestational
age, WFA-weight for age, LFA-length for age, HFA-head
circumference for age, WFL-weight for length. P<0.05 considered
significant. |
 |
Fig. 1 Pattern of growth in terms of
weight, length and head circumference of ELBW neonates.
|
Forty-four percent (35 of 79) children required
readmission during first year (21 once, 9 twice and 5 thrice). Reasons
for readmissions were anemia (10, 19%), sepsis (8, 15%), pneumonia (8,
15%), acute gastroenteritis (6, 11%), bronchiolitis (3, 6%), laser
treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (3, 6%), inguinal hernia (6,
12%) and fever (3, 6%). Nine children (11%) died during first year
(sepsis 6, pneumonia 3).
We created a prediction model for underweight infants
at corrected age of 1 year. Univariate analysis revealed BPD,
intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), grade III /IV and Z-score for weight
at 3 months to be significant predictors of underweight at 1 year.
Regression analysis revealed Z-score at 3 months (OR 0.4, 95% CI:
0.2-0.8; P=0.006) and IVH grade III/IV (OR 11.1, 95% CI:
1.04-118.1; P=0.046) as independent predictors of underweight at
corrected age of 1 year. Overall, this model had an accuracy of 80% for
predicting underweight at 1 year.
Discussion
Our results showed that a significant proportion of
ELBW neonates remained growth retarded at 1 and 2 years despite
improving trend in their Z-scores. Weight at 3 months and major IVH were
significant predictors of underweight at 1 year. Nearly half of ELBW
infants required readmission and 11% died during follow-up of one year.
The main limitation of our study is high rate of loss
to follow-up which probably underestimated deaths and admissions. There
is also a possibility of failure to recall all admissions and
morbidities. Moreover, sample size was small and post-discharge dietary
details were not recorded adequately, which could have helped us to
determine the cause for persistent poor growth.
Lin, et al. [3] found that 30-40% of their
ELBW infants had delay in weight, length and HC at 6, 12 and 24 months,
which remained more or less constant. The Z-scores for the growth were
significantly lower than term babies at 2 years. Sharma, et al.
[4] also reported that 60% of their ELBW neonates had undernutrition,
75% were stunted, 60% had microcephaly and 18% had wasting at corrected
age of 18 months. Modi, et al. [11] reported significantly lower
Z-scores for weight, length and HC at 1 year in VLBW babies. ELBW
babies develop a large protein and calorie deficit in the initial
postnatal period which later on becomes difficult to compensate. In
addition, inadequate complementary feeding along with recurrent illness
and hospitalizations add to poor growth during childhood.
Sharma, et al. [4] reported 9% readmissions
and 8% death during their 18 month follow-up period, though only a small
proportion were ELBW and this might have probably underestimated their
re-admission and death rates. An Australian study [12] showed that their
cohort of 63 ELBW babies required frequent hospitalizations due to
ill-health.
We conclude that ELBW babies continue to improve
their growth but a sizeable proportion remains growth retarded at 2
years. Hence it is important not only to emphasize on their immediate
postnatal nutrition but also continued monitoring of their diet and
growth during follow-up, appropriate timely intervention and adequate
pre-discharge counseling to prevent mortality and morbidities. Studies
with larger sample size and longer duration of follow-up are needed from
diverse settings in developing countries.
Contributors: KM: designed, supervised the study
and critically reviewed the manuscript; DL: data analysis and drafted
the manuscript; GM: helped in writing the paper; RM: follow-up data
collection.
Funding: PGI Research Scheme; Competing
interests: None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• A significant proportion of ELBW neonates
remain growth retarded at 2 years and suffer from significant
post-discharge mortality and morbidities.
|
References
1. Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, Vohr BR, Fanaroff
AA, Donovan EF, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of
extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis
Pediatrics. 2005;115:696-703.
2. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA,
Hintz SR, Vohr B, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment
among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA.
2004;292:2357-65.
3. Lin YC, Lin YJ, Lin CH. Growth and
neurodevelopmental outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants: a
single center’s experience. Pediatr Neonatol. 2011;52:342-8.
4. Sharma PK, Sankar MJ, Sapra S, Saxena R,
Karthikeyan CV, Deorari A, et al. Growth and neurosensory
outcomes of preterm very low birth weight infants at 18 months of
corrected age. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78:1485-90.
5. Mukhopadhyay K, Mahajan R, Louis D, Narang A.
Longitudinal growth of very low birth weight neonates during first year
of life and risk factors for malnutrition in a developing country. Acta
Paediatr. 2013;102: 278-81.
6. De Jesus LC, Pappas A, Shankaran S, Kendrick D,
Das A, Higgins RD, et al. Risk factors for post-neonatal
intensive care unit discharge mortality among extremely low birth weight
infants. J Pediatr. 2012;161:70-4.
7. Mukhopadhyay K, Louis D, Murki S, Mahajan R, Dogra
MR, Kumar P. Survival and morbidity among two cohorts of extremely low
birth weight neonates from a tertiary hospital in Northern India. Indian
Pediatr. 2013;50: 1047-50.
8. New WHO Growth Charts. Available from:
http://www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/software/en. Accessed March 10, 2014.
9. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Boyd E. Intrauterine
growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at
gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics. 1966;37:403-8.
10. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP,
Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis.
Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg.
1978;187:1-7.
11. Modi M, Saluja S, Kler N, Batra A, Kaur A, Garg
P, et al. Growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of VLBW infants
at 1 year corrected age. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:573-7.
12. O’Callaghan MJ, Burns Y, Gray P, Harvey JM, Mohay
HI, Rogers Y, et al. Extremely low birth weight and control
infants at 2 years corrected age: a comparison of intellectual
abilities, motor performance, growth and health. Early Hum Dev. 1995;
40:115-28.
|
|
 |
|