|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51:
707-711 |
 |
Evaluation of Integrated Child Development
Services Program in Gujarat, India
|
Rajesh K Chudasama, AM Kadri, *Pramod B Verma, Umed V Patel, Nirav
Joshi,
Dipesh Zalavadiya and Chirag Bhola
From the Departments of Community Medicine, Government Medical
College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India; and GMERS Medical College, Gandhinagar;
Gujarat, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Rajesh K Chudasama, Vandana Embroidary, Mato
Shree Complex, Sardar Nagar Main Road,
Rajkot 360 001, Gujarat, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: January 22, 2014;
Initial Review: February 20, 2014;
Accepted: June 06, 2014.
|
Objective: To evaluate Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)
program in terms of infrastructure of Anganwadi centers, inputs,
process, coverage and utilization of services, and issues related to
program operation in twelve districts of Gujarat, India.
Design: Facility (Anganwadi) based study.
Setting: Twelve districts of Gujarat, India
(April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2013).
Participants: ICDS service providers (60
Anganwadi workers from 46 rural and 14 urban Anganwadi
centers) and their beneficiaries.
Main Outcome measures: Coverage of supplementary
nutrition, pre-school education, immunization and referral services.
Results: Supplementary nutrition coverage was
reported in 48.3% in children. Interruption in supply of supplementary
nutrition during last six months was reported in 61.7% Anganwadi centers.
Only 20% centers reported 100% pre-school education coverage among
children. Immunization of all children was recorded in only 10%
Anganwadi centers, while in 76.7% centers, no such records were
available. Regular health checkup of beneficiaries was done in 30%
centers. Referral slips were available in 18.3% Anganwadi centers
and referral of sick children was done from only 8.3% centers.
Conclusion: There are program gaps in coverage of
supplementary nutrition in children, its regular supply to the
beneficiaries, in pre-school activities coverage, recording of
immunization, and regular health check-up of beneficiaries and referral
of sick children.
Keywords: Evaluation, ICDS, Preschool education, Supplementary
nutrition.
|
The Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) program includes a
network of Anganwadi Centers (AWC), literally courtyard play
centers, with Anganwadi workers (AWW) providing integrated
services comprising supplementary nutrirtion (SN), immunization, health
check-up, and referral services to children below six years of age and
expectant and nursing mothers [1,2]. Non-formal pre-school education
(PSE) is imparted to children of the age group 3-6 years, and nutrition
and health education day (NHED) conducted for women in the age group
15-45 years [2].
After more than three decades of implementation, the
success of ICDS program in tackling maternal and childhood problems
still remain a matter of concern [3]. Studies reported association of
improved nutritional status and immunization status of children less
than 3 years age, with ICDS services [4,5] whereas others reported no
such association [6,7]. According to National Family Health Survey-3,
though 81.1% children under age six years were covered by AWCs, children
who received any service from AWC were only 28.4% [9]. The present study
was conducted to evaluate the various aspects of ICDS program like
infrastructure of AWCs and baseline characteristics of AWWs (inputs),
provision of various services (process), coverage of various ICDS
services provided (output), utilization of services, and issues related
to program operation in different districts of Gujarat state.
Methods
National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child
Development (NIPCCD) with Monitoring and Evaluation unit in the Ministry
of Women and Child Development is responsible for regular monitoring and
supervision of ICDS scheme by Central Monitoring Unit. The monitoring
and supervision of the ICDS scheme at secondary and primary level
involves state, district, project and community level monitoring [9]. At
State level, supervision and monitoring of the scheme is being
undertaken with help of Community Medicine departments of Medical
Colleges. From Gujarat state, two institutions (PDU Government Medical
College, Rajkot and Government Medical College, Vadodara) were selected
by NIPCCD. The present study was conducted by Community Medicine
Department, PDU Government Medical College, Rajkot in 12 districts of
Gujarat state as directed by NIPCCD. The 12 districts allotted were:
Ahmedabad, Amreli, Bhavnagar, Gandhinagar, Jamnagar, Junagadh, Kutch,
Mehsana, Patan, Porbandar, Rajkot, and Surendranagar. As per the
guidelines provided and districts allotted by NIPCCD, from above
mentioned 12 districts, three districts were to be visited in one
quarter (one district per month). In allotted 12 districts, there are
total 139 ICDS blocks, 7,684 villages and 20,201 Anganwadi
centers. The ICDS program is administered and supervised at district
level by Program Officer. Under Program Officer, there are 8-10 ICDS
blocks each of which is supervised by Child Development Program Officer
(CDPO) and one such ICDS block covers around 100 Anganwadi
centers.
One ICDS block from each district was selected first
by using simple random sampling (lottery method). The CDPO of respective
ICDS block was then informed prior about the nature of visit and how
many AWCs will be visited. In next stage, from each selected block, five
Anganwadi centers were randomly selected on day of visit without
prior information to AWWs. A total 60 Anganwadi centers were
selected including 46 from rural area and 14 from urban area during
April 2012 to March 2013. An attempt was made to select not more than
two Anganwadi centers from each of the supervisory circle. A team
of four members including one Associate Professor, one Assistant
Professor and two resident doctors from Community Medicine Department,
PDU Government Medical College, Rajkot visited the selected AWCs.
Ethical clearance was taken for present study from the Institutional
Ethical Committee.
Anganwadi workers were interviewed and records
were reviewed by using a pre-designed and pre-tested proforma provided
by NIPCCD. Considering the usual program evaluation framework, the
information was collected for: (i) inputs – i.e. infrastructure
of AWCs and baseline characteristics of AWWs; (ii) process –
i.e. provision of various ICDS services to the beneficiaries; and (iii)
output – i.e. coverage of services provided like SN, PSE and
NHED. AWC with constructed covered area of not less than 600 sq feet was
considered as having an adequate indoor space [10]. Information was also
collected about utilization of various services provided and issues
related to program operation by interviewing the Anganwadi
workers. Nutritional status was registered in 30 AWCs because of change
in format provided by NIPCCD. The collected data was entered and
analyzed by using Epi Info software version 3.5.1 (Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA) [11].
Results
Majority (66.7%) of AWC buildings were owned by State
and 73.3% AWCs were having concrete building (Table I).
More than half of AWCs (53.3%) had an adequate indoor space and 61.7%
had child friendly toilet facility. All the AWWs were literate and 86.7%
had received job training.
TABLE I Infrastructure and Baseline Characteristics of Anganwadi Centers in Selected Districts of Gujarat
Parameter |
Rural (n=46)No. (%) |
Urban (n=14)No. (%) |
Total (n=60)No. (%) |
Anganwadi Centers (AWCs) Infrastructure
|
Building ownership by State |
36 (78.3) |
4 (28.6) |
40 (66.7)
|
Concrete building type (Pucca) |
37 (80.4) |
7 (50.0) |
44 (73.3)
|
Adequate indoor space |
26 (56.5) |
6 (42.9) |
32 (53.3) |
Adequate outdoor space |
22 (47.8) |
6 (42.9) |
28 (46.7) |
Separate toilet facility available |
32 (69.6) |
5 (35.7) |
37 (61.7)
|
Tap water supply |
24 (52.2) |
11 (78.6) |
35 (58.3) |
Anganwadi workers (AWWs) characteristics
|
Work experience >10 years |
32 (69.5) |
7 (50.0) |
39 (65.0) |
Literate (at least primary level) |
46 (100.0) |
14 (100.0) |
60 (100.0)
|
Received induction training |
18 (39.1) |
1 (7.1)
|
19 (31.7)
|
Received job training |
38 (82.6) |
14 (100.0) |
52 (86.7)
|
Received refresher training
|
31 (67.4) |
7 (50.0) |
38 (63.3)
|
Received IMNCI training |
27 (58.7) |
8 (57.1) |
35 (58.3) |
IMNCI- Integrated Management of Neonatal & Childhood
Illnesses. |
Majority of registered pregnant (96%) and lactating
(97.8%) mothers, and 87.0% adolescent girls were availing ICDS services
(Table II). NHED was celebrated in 81.7% AWCs. Growth
chart was present in 96.7% AWCs and accurately plotted by 95.0%
Anganwadi workers. Nutritional grades of enrolled children were
recorded from registers according to WHO growth chart in only 30 AWCs
because of change in format provided by NIPCCD. Proportion of
underweight among children who were registered was 20% (18.5% moderately
and 1.5% severely underweight).
TABLE II
Maternal and Child Health Services Delivered Under ICDS Program at Anganwadi Centers in Selected Districts of Gujarat
Variables |
Rural, No. (%) |
Urban, No. (%) |
Total, No. (%) |
Maternal health services
|
Pregnant mothers availing services/registered |
454/468 (97.0) |
95/104 (91.3) |
549/572 (96.0)
|
Lactating mothers availing services/registered
|
386/390 (99.0) |
107/114 (93.9) |
493/504 (97.8) |
Iron and folic acid tablet distribution
|
32/46 (69.6) |
11/14 (78.6) |
43/60 (71.7) |
Adolescent health services
|
AWC celebrated NHED* day
|
40/46 (87.0) |
9/14 (64.3) |
49/60 (81.7)
|
Reproductive health education |
40/46 (87.0) |
12/14 (85.7) |
52/60 (86.7)
|
Adolescent girls receiving services/registered |
1204/1330 (90.5) |
472/597 (79.1) |
1676/1927 (87.0) |
Child health services
|
Growth chart available |
44/46 (95.7) |
14/14 (100.0) |
58/60 (96.7) |
Accurate use of growth chart
|
43/46 (93.5) |
14/14 (100.0) |
57/60 (95.0) |
Deworming tablets distribution |
18/46 (39.1)
|
8/14 (57.1) |
26/60 (43.3)
|
Salter scale for weighing |
35/46 (76.1)
|
10/14 (71.4)
|
45/60 (75.0)
|
Children of 6 months-6 years availing services/registered |
2916/3550 (82.1) |
893/1244(71.8) |
3809/4794 (79.5) |
* NHED – Nutrition and Health Education Day. |
Supplementary nutrition coverage was reported in
48.3% children. Almost equal coverage of supplementary nutrition was
reported among pregnant and lactating mothers in rural (87.0%) and urban
(85.7%) AWCs. Only 20% AWCs reported 100% preschool education coverage
among children. Immunization of all children was recorded in only 10%
AWCs, while in 76.7% AWCs no such records were available. Regular health
checkup of beneficiaries was done in 30.0% AWCs. Referral slips were
available in 18.3% AWCs and referral of sick children was done from only
8.3% AWCs.
Supplementary nutrition was fully acceptable (90%),
of good quality (86.7%) and in adequate quantity available to
beneficiaries (95.0%), though 61.7% AWCs reported interruption in supply
during last six months (Table III and
Web Table I).
Low cost games (66.7%), charts/posters and play way methods were used to
provide PSE. Majority of AWCs (81.6%) were conducting NHED by using
lecture method (73.3%).
TABLE III Characteristics and Issues Related to Various Services at Anganwadi Centers Under ICDS Program in Gujarat
Variables |
Rural (n=46); No.(%) |
Urban (n=14); No.(%) |
Total (n=60);No.(%) |
Supplementary nutrition
|
Fully acceptable
|
43 (93.5) |
11 (78.6) |
54 (90.0) |
Good quality
|
42 (91.3) |
10 (71.4) |
52 (86.7) |
Community participation to provide food |
38 (82.6)
|
13 (92.9)
|
51 (85.0) |
Reported interruption in supply |
27 (58.7) |
10 (71.4) |
37 (61.7) |
Pre-school Education (PSE)
|
Time table used
|
29 (63.0) |
7 (50.0) |
36 (60.0) |
Low cost games used
|
34 (73.9)
|
6 (42.9) |
40 (66.7) |
Charts/posters used
|
28 (60.9) |
8 (57.1) |
36 (60.0) |
Play way method used
|
24 (52.2) |
12 (85.7) |
36 (60.0) |
Nutrition and Health Education Day (NHED) |
NHED meeting done
|
40 (87.0)
|
9 (64.3)
|
49 (81.6) |
By using lecture method
|
35 (76.1) |
9 (64.3) |
44 (73.3) |
By using demonstrations |
10 (21.7) |
1 (7.1) |
11 (18.3) |
Issues reported by Anganwadi worker
|
No separate storage facility |
27 (58.7)
|
9 (64.3)
|
36 (60.0) |
No/inadequate outdoor space
|
24 (52.2) |
8 (57.1) |
32 (53.3) |
No separate kitchen |
14 (30.4) |
5 (35.7) |
19 (31.7) |
Various other issues were described by AWWs including
non-availability of storage facility (60.0%), no/inadequate outdoor
space (53.3%), inadequate indoor space (46.7%), non-availability of
separate kitchen (31.7%) and child friendly toilet facility (30.0%) at
AWCs.
Discussion
The present study reported availability of concrete
type of building in majority of AWCs, and availability of separate child
friendly toilet facility and adequate indoor space in more than half of
rural AWCs. Only a few AWWs in urban areas received induction training.
It has been documented that proper training improves AWWs‘ performances
[12], and inadequate training of AWWs may be the reason for poor
performance AWCs [13]. Utilization of ICDS services was high among
registered pregnant and lactating mothers, adolescent girls and children
the involvement of pregnant and lactating women and adolescent girls are
central to tackling the problem of underweight and malnutrition in the
country [14].
Success of growth monitoring depend upon the extent
to which counselling support, weighing scales and growth charts are
available in AWCs [2]. Availability and accurate use of growth chart to
assess the nutritional status of children in present study was higher
than in some previous studies [15,16]. Distribution of Iron and Folic
Acid tablets to the beneficiaries was also higher than previous studies
[14,17]. Supplementary nutrition coverage was inadequate in children,
but was good in pregnant and lactating mothers. It indicates that the
Anganwadi workers have to give more emphasis to attract children
from their community to Anganwadi by providing other services
like preschool education, and also by celebrating nutrition and health
education days. As take home ration was provided from only very few
AWCs, Local authority has to give attention on this issue and provide
timely supply of take home ration at AWCs.
Studies have reported poor skills development of
Anganwadi children as against the private nursery school children,
which could be attributed to poor stimulating environment including lack
of play materials, hence there is need to improve the preschool
environment of the Anganwadis [18,19]. Emphasis should be given
on good quality supervision and also by sensitizing them about the
importance of timely referral of sick children to the higher center.
The coverage performance of AWCs and maternal and
child health services delivered by Anganwadi centers still
needs improvement. The study has reported gaps in infrastructure
facility mainly inadequacy of indoor and outdoor space; coverage of
supplementary nutrition in children, regular supply of foods to the
beneficiaries; gaps in pre-school activities coverage, recording of
immunization, regular health check-up of beneficiaries and referral of
sick children.
Contributors: RKC: Conduct of study, data
analysis and manuscript writing; AMK, PBV, UVP: have assisted in data
collection, analysis and in manuscript writing; CB, NJ, DZ: assisted in
data collection and analysis.
Funding: National Institute of Public
Cooperation and Child Development (NIPCCD), India.
Competing Interests: None stated.
What is Already Known?
•
ICDS program is operational for more than three decades in
India.
What This Study Adds?
•
There are state level
gaps in infrastructure facility, mainly adequacy of indoor and
outdoor space, coverage and supply of supplementary nutrition,
preschool education activities, immunization and referral of
sick children.
|
References
1. National consultation to review the existing
guidelines in ICDS scheme in the field of health and nutrition. Indian
Pediatr. 2001;38:721-31.
2. Three Decades of ICDS-An Appraisal. National
Institute of Public Cooperation and Child Development (NIPCCD), 2006.
Available from: http://nipccd.nic.in/reports/icdsvol3.pdf.
Accessed January 15, 2014.
3. Agarwal KN, Agarwal DK, Agarwal A, Rai S, Prasad
R, Agarwal S, et al. Impact of integrated child development
services (ICDS) on internal nutrition & birth weight in rural Varanasi.
Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:1321-7.
4. Saiyed F, Seshadri S. Impact of the integrated
package nutrition & health services. Indian J Pediatr. 2000;67:322-8.
5. Bhasin S K, Bhatia V, Kumar P, Aggarwal OP. Long
term nutritional effects of ICDS. Indian J Pediatr. 2001;63:211-6.
6. Trivedi S, Chhaparwal BC, Thore S. Utilization of
ICDS scheme in children one to six years of age in a rural block of
central India. Indian J Pediatr. 1995;32:47-50.
7. Gragmolati M, Bredenkamp C, Dasgupta M, Lee YK,
Shekar M. ICDS and persistent under nutrition: strategies to enhance the
impact. Economic and Political Weekly 2006; 1193-1201.
8. National Family Health Survey, India 2005-06.
(NFHS 3) Mumbai: International Institute for Population Science and
Macro International, September, 2007.
9. Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)
Scheme- Guidelines for Monitoring and Supervision of the Scheme. Central
Monitoring Unit (ICDS), National Institute of Public Cooperation and
Child Development, New Delhi.
10. ICDS Mission – The Broad Framework for
Implementation, Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of
India. October, 2012.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epi
Info version 3.5.1, 2008. Available from:
http://www.cdc.gov/epiinfo/. Accessed December 30, 2013.
12. Halder A, Ray S, Biswas R, Biswas B, Mukherjee D.
Effectiveness of training on infant feeding practices among community
influencers in a rural area of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health.
2001;45:51-6.
13. Datta SS, Boratne AV, Cherian J, Joice YS,
Vignesh JT, Singh Z. Performance of Anganwadi centers in urban
and rural area: a facility survey in Coastal South India. Indian J
Matern Child Health. 2010;12:1-9.
14. Dixit S, Sakalle S, Patel GS, Taneja G,
Chourasiya S. Evaluation of functioning of ICDS project areas under
Indore and Ujjain divisions of the state of Madhya Pradesh. Online J
Health Allied Scs. 2010;9:2.
15. Manhas S, Dogra M. Awareness among Anganwadi
workers and the prospect of child health and nutrition: a study in
Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir,
India. Anthropologist. 2012;14:171-5.
16. Kapil U, Saxena N, Nayar D, Gnanasekaran N.
Status of growth monitoring activities in selected ICDS projects in
Rajasthan. Indian Pediatr. 1996;33:949-51.
17. Surwade JB, Mantri SB, Wadagale AV. Utilization
of ICDS scheme in urban and rural area of Latur district with special
reference to pediatric beneficiaries. International J Recent Trends Sci
Technology. 2013;5:107-10.
18. Thajnisa M, Nair MKC, George B, Shyamalan K, Rema
Devi S, Ishitha R. Growth and development status of Anganwadi and
private nursery school children – A comparison. Teens. 2007;1:23-4.
19. Nair MKC, Mehta V. Life cycle approach to child development.
Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:S7-S11.
|
|
 |
|