Is C-Reactive Protein level useful in
differentiating infected from uninfected neonates among those at
risk of infection? |
Elizabeth Mathai1,5, Usha Christopher2,
Matthews Mathai2, Atanu Kumar Jana3, Dolly Rose4
and Staffan Bergström5
Departments of 1Microbiology,
2Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3Neonatology and
4Clinical Pathology, Christian
Medical College, Vellore, India and 5Division
of International Health, IHCAR, Department of
Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Correspondence to: Dr. Elizabeth Mathai, Department
of Microbiology, Christian Medical College Hospital,
Vellore, India 632004, E-mail:
mathaim@cmcvellore.ac.in
Manuscript received: November 6, 2003, Initial
review completed: December 30, 2003,
Revision accepted: April 15, 2004.
Abstract:
Objective: To document effects of
intrapartum risk factors for early onset sepsis (EOS) on CRP
levels in neonates and to assess the suitability of this test
in diagnosing EOS. Design: Cohort study. Setting:
Labour and post natal wards in a tertiary level teaching
hospital in India. Subjects: 250 neonates at risk of
developing infection. Methods: CRP levels in cord blood
and neonatal blood at 24 hrs were estimated using commercial
kits. Babies were observed for signs of sepsis for at least 48
hours. Results: Seven (2.8%) neonates had elevated CRP
levels in the cord blood. At 24 hours, 102 (40.8%) babies had
elevated levels. Elevated cord CRP levels was significantly
associated with rupture of membranes for 24 hours (p =0.04),
labour more than 12 hours (p = 0.002), and maternal fever (p =
0.01). At 24 hours, elevated CRP levels were associated with
primiparity (p= 0.006), more than three vaginal examinations
after membrane rupture (p=0.02), meconium staining of amniotic
fluid (p =0.02) and amnioinfusion (p =0.02). Ten (4%) babies
developed EOS. The negative predictive value for elevated CRP
levels at 24 h was 99%. Conclusion: Several intrapartum
risk factors for EOS can cause elevation in CRP levels.
However, this test may be useful in excluding infection.
Keywords: C-reactive protein, neonatal sepsis
It is estimated that about 5 million neonates die
every year in low-income countries. Infection contributes to
approximately 30 to 40% of neonatal deaths in these countries(1).
However, early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis has remained a
frustrating experience even in high-income countries(2). This has
prompted the evaluation of surrogate markers of inflammation as
possible tools for early diagnosis of bacterial sepsis(3-7).
Estimations of cytokine levels and CRP levels are potentially useful
in this respect(3-8). Although several studies confirm that CRP
levels are useful in the early diagnosis of sepsis, there are
reports to the contrary(9-12). It is suggested that serial rather
than single determinations of CRP levels may be more useful in
diagnosis of sepsis(13). Such tests could be of special importance
in a newborn that is asymptomatic or has only equivocal signs at
birth but has risk factors for infection(2).
The present study was designed to evaluate the
effect of intrapartum risk factors for early onset sepsis (EOS) on
neonatal CRP levels and the utility of CRP in the diagnosis of EOS.
Methods
This was a prospective cohort study conducted at
a tertiary teaching hospital in Tamil Nadu from March to October
2001.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Neonates were included if their mothers had at
least one of the following risk factors for neonatal infection:
prelabour rupture of membranes (ROM), more than three vaginal
examinations after ROM, intrapartum fever (oral temperature >38º C),
foul-smelling liquor, and untreated or partially treated urinary
tract infection in the antenatal period. Newborn babies born at less
than 28 weeks, weighing less than 1,000 g or with lethal congenital
anomalies were excluded from the study.
Primary outcome
The primary outcome was EOS, defined as sepsis
occurring within 48 hours of birth. The following were considered to
be signs suggestive of sepsis: lethargy or poor feeding; axillary
temperature <36ºC or >38º C for more than one hour; significant
jaundice with serum bilirubin >15 mg% in the absence of blood group
incompatibility; apnoea or respiratory distress; peripheral
capillary refill time of >3 sec on the forehead or mid sternum;
heart rate of >160/min corrected for elevation of body temperature
(10 beats / ºC rise); vomiting, diarrhoea or ileus; petechiae or
bleeding diathesis; omphalitis; seizures. Laboratory markers
considered abnormal were: total leukocyte count <5,000/mm3,
neutrophil count <1,500/mm3, and immature to total neutrophil ratio
> 0.2.
Newborn babies developing signs suggestive of
sepsis were categorised as having sepsis or probable sepsis. Sepsis
was diagnosed if the newborn baby had signs suggestive of sepsis and
a positive blood culture. Probable sepsis was diagnosed in a newborn
baby with negative blood culture, if it had two or more signs
suggestive of sepsis and one or more abnormal laboratory markers, or
two or more abnormal laboratory markers with one or more signs
suggestive of sepsis. Newborn babies with sepsis or probable sepsis
received antibiotics for about 14 days. The remaining newborn babies
were classified as at risk of infection and received antibiotics for
an average of 5 days.
Sample size estimation
For an expected incidence of early onset sepsis
among 8000 births of 6% and a worst acceptable incidence of 3%, the
sample size required for 95% confidence is 234. For an expected
incidence of 4% and a worst acceptable incidence of 2%, the sample
size for 90% confidence is 252. Therefore, a sample of 250 was
studied.
Laboratory techniques
Approximately 5 mL of blood was collected from
the umbilical cord after clamping and cutting of the cord. About 24
h later, approximately 2 mL of blood was collected by venepuncture
from the new born. Samples were transported without delay to the
laboratory for total leukocyte count, absolute neutrophil count,
immature to total leukocyte ratio and CRP estimation. CRP levels
were determined on a daily basis using a latex agglutination test
(Omega Diagnostics Ltd, Alloa, Scotland, UK). This is a
semi-quantitative method with a detection limit of 6 mg/L. The
investigator performing the CRP test was blinded to the clinical
status of the newborn babies.
Data collection and analyses
Newborn babies were observed for signs of sepsis
for at least 48 h. Clinical data were collected using a
questionnaire. Data were analysed using EpiInfo Version 6.
Proportions were compared by Chi-square test. Relative risks were
calculated for the risk factors for sepsis. The predictive values of
CRP for diagnosing neonatal sepsis were also calculated.
Results
There were 250 newborn babies enrolled for the
study. The mean (SD) gestational age was 38.5 (2.2) week. Seven
(2.8%) neonates had CRP levels of >6 mg/L in cord blood while
102 babies (40.8%) had elevated levels at 24 hours. CRP levels in
cord blood of >6 mg/L was significantly associated with
rupture of membranes for more than 24 hours, labour for more than 12
hours and maternal fever (Table I). At 24 hours, elevation in
CRP levels was significantly associated with primiparity, more than
three vaginal examinations after rupture of membranes, meconium
staining of amniotic fluid and amnioinfusion. When the cut-off CRP
level was increased to 12 mg/L, significant association was noted
only with maternal fever. There was no association between Apgar
score, birth weight and CRP levels.
Table I
Association of risk factors with CRP levels.
|
|
CRP |
|
|
|
Cord blood |
Neonatal blood (24 h) |
|
Risk factor
|
Number
of cases
observed |
≥6 mg/L
(n=7)
|
≥6 mg/L
(n=102)
|
≥12 mg/L
(n=48)
|
RR (95% CI)
|
Primiparity
|
164
|
6
|
77*
|
32
|
*1.62 (1.12, 2.33)
|
ROM < 12 hrs |
58 |
1 |
20 |
11 |
|
> 12 hrs
|
192
|
6
|
82
|
37
|
|
> 24 hrs
|
75
|
5*
|
30
|
16
|
*5.83 (1.16, 29.4)
|
Labour > 12 hrs
|
103
|
7*
|
47
|
26*
|
*1.69 (1.01, 2.81)
|
Maternal fever
|
22
|
3*
|
11
|
8*
|
*7.77 (1.86, 32.53)
|
|
|
|
|
|
*2.07 (1.11, 3.85)
|
> 3 vaginal
|
114
|
5
|
56*
|
27
|
*1.45 (1.08, 1.96)
|
examinations after ROM |
|
|
|
|
|
Foul smelling liquor |
6 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
|
Meconium in liquor
|
50
|
2
|
28*
|
13
|
*1.51 (1.12, 2.05)
|
Amnioinfusion
|
15
|
1
|
11*
|
4
|
*1.89 (1.34, 2.67)
|
Postpartum metritis |
7 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
|
Gestation <37 wk |
32 |
1 |
9 |
4 |
|
Male infant |
142 |
6 |
56 |
25 |
|
Normal delivery |
134 |
1 |
50 |
21 |
|
* P < 0.05 ; ROM = rupture of membranes.
Within 48 hours, 61 of the 250 babies with risk
of infection developed at least one sign attributable to infection.
Twenty seven had more than one sign. Of these, only two babies were
diagnosed to have sepsis. Group B beta haemolytic streptococci were
isolated from blood culture in one baby, while the other had
coagulase-negative staphylococci. An additional eight babies were
diagnosed to have probable sepsis. The sensitivity, specificity,
positive and negative predictive values of CRP estimation at 24 hr
for diagnosis of EOS using 6 mg/L as the cut off were 80%, 60%, 7.7%
and 98.6% respectively. The corresponding values for a cut off level
of 12 mg/L were 30%, 81.3%, 6.3% and 96.5% respectively.
Table 2 provides association between CRP
levels and sepsis. CRP elevation was not significantly associated
with the presence or number of signs. It was also noted that 10 of
the 12 babies with CRP levels of 48 mg/L or more did not have
evidence of infection. Only three of the 48 babies with CRP levels
above 12 mg/L were diagnosed to have EOS.
Table II
CRP levels and neonatal sepsis.
CRP levels
(mg/L) |
Sepsis |
Probable
sepsis |
No
sepsis |
Cord blood <6 (n = 243) |
At 24 hrs |
|
|
|
<6
|
0
|
1
|
146
|
6
|
1
|
3
|
48
|
> 12
|
1
|
2
|
41
|
Cord blood >6 (n = 7) |
At 24 hrs |
|
|
|
<6
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
>12
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
Only one baby among those with sepsis or probable
sepsis had abnormal total leukocyte and absolute neutrophil counts
in the cord blood. Five (50%) had abnormal immature to total
leukocyte ratio. One hundred and nine of the 148 (74%) CRP negative
babies and 58 of the 102 (57%) CRP positive babies received
antibiotics for less than three days.
Discussion
This study done to evaluate the association
between intrapartum risk factors for infection with CRP levels
showed that several such risk factors can cause elevated CRP levels
in the absence of infection. This is in agreement with previously
published reports(7,13). Since CRP does not cross placenta, the
elevated levels are due to production of CRP in the neonate.
Chorioamnionitis can result in elevation of IL 6 levels even in
uninfected neonates(7). Stimuli other than infection, like hypoxia,
trauma and metabolic changes can also induce production of
proinflammatory mediators(7). Significant association is reported
between birth asphyxia and elevated IL 6 levels. In prolonged labour,
IL 6 levels rise in the neonate probably related to physical
activity of labour. This cytokine stimulates CRP production.
There are few longitudinal studies examining CRP
changes in healthy babies with intrapartum risk of infection.
Cytokine elevation seen in the early neonatal period in such babies
probably reflects physiological stress induced at birth(13). Since
CRP levels rise during the initial 24 hours in many babies
irrespective of infection or administration of antibiotics, serial
determinations in this period may not be of much use in diagnosis
but may help in identifying uninfected babies and restricting
antibiotic use(14,15). Our data showed lower antibiotic use in
babies who were CRP negative.
Various studies utilising varying protocols have
suggested different values as upper limit of normal(8). In our
study, at 24 h, CRP levels of 6mg/L had a negative predictive value
of 99%. This level therefore could be used to guide antibiotic
therapy when latex agglutination kits are used. Testing samples in
further dilutions to establish the actual amount of CRP may not be
necessary since increasing levels were not associated with
increasing severity or prognosis.
Cord blood CRP levels estimated using a kit with
6 mg/L as detection limit, could not satisfactorily predict EOS.
Recent studies show that cut off values may be different for cord
and 24 h samples(7). More sensitive techniques like nephelometry may
help set cut off levels for cord blood. In comparison to leukocyte
counts and ratios, CRP levels at 24 h proved to be the single best
indicator for diagnosing EOS. However, the 80% sensitivity obtained
is unacceptably low for making critical decisions. If utilised with
caution, this test can help in reducing antimicrobial use in the
new-born.
Contributors: EM, MM, AKJ and SB
conceptualised the study and drafted the paper. EM, UC, MM, AKJ and
DR did data collection, analysis and drafting of the paper.
Competing interests: None stated.
Funding: Institutional research grant of Christian Medical
College, Vellore, India and a planning grant from SAREC within
Swedish International Development Authority (SIDA).
Key Messages |
• Intrapartum risk factors for early onset sepsis can cause
elevation of cord and neonatal CRP levels in the absence of
infection.
• A CRP level of <6mg/L at 24 h has a good
negative predictive value for neonatal sepsis.
• Serial CRP levels are not useful in diagnosing early onset
sepsis.
|
|
1. The WHO young infants study group, Bacterial etiology of
serious infections in young infants in developing countries:
results of a multicentric study, Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;
18: S17-22.
2. Escobar GJ. Effect of systemic
inflammatory response on biochemical markers of neonatal
bacterial infection: A fresh look at old confounders. Clini
Chem 2003; 49: 21-22.
3. Ng PC, Cheng SH, Chui KM, Fok TF, Wong
MY, Wong W et al. Diagnosis of late onset neonatal
sepsis with cytokines, adhesion molecule, and C-reactive
protein in preterm very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis
Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 77: F221-F227.
4. Chan DK, Ho LY. Usefulness of C-reactive
protein in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Singapore Med J
1997; 38: 252-255.
5. Magudumana MO, Ballot DE, Cooper PA,
Trusler J, Cory BJ, Viljoen E et al. Serial interleukin
6 measurements in the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J
Trop Pediatr 2000; 46: 267-271.
6. Dollner H, Vatten L, Linnebo I, Zanussi
GF, Laerdal A, Austgulen R. Inflammatory mediators in
umbilical plasma from neonates who develop early-onset sepsis.
Biol Neonate 2001; 80: 41-47.
7. Chiesa C, Pellegrini G, Panero A, Osborn
JF, Signore F, Assumma, et al. C-reactive protein,
interleukin 6 and procalcitonin in immediate post natal
period: influence of illness severity, risk status, antenatal
and perinatal complications and infection. Clin Chem 2003; 49:
60 -68
8. Vesikari T. Cytokine determinations and
rapid diagnosis of early onset neonatal septicemia. Acta
Pediatr 1999; 88: 585-591.
9. Suri M, Thirupuram S, Sharma VK.
Diagnostic and prognostic utility of C-reactive protein,
alpha-1-antitrypsin and alpha-2-macroglobulin in neonatal
sepsis: a comparative account. Indian Pediatr 1991; 28:
1159-1164.
10. Krediet T, Gerards L, Fleer A, van
Stekelenburg G. The predictive value of CRP and I/T-ratio in
neonatal infection. J Perinat Med 1992; 20: 479-485.
11. Anwer SK, Mustafa S. Rapid
identification of neonatal sepsis. J Pak Med Assoc 2000; 50:
94-98.
12. Santana C, Guindeo MC, Gonzalez G,
Garcia-Munoz F, Saavedra P, Domenech E. Cord blood levels of
cytokines as predictors of early neonatal sepsis. Acta Pediatr
2001; 90: 1176-1181.
13. Chiesa C, Signore F, Assumma M, Buffone
E, Tramontozzi P, Osborn JF, et al. Serial measurements
of C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 in the immediate
postnatal period: reference intervals and analysis of maternal
and perinatal confounders. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 1016-1022.
14. Philip AG, Mills PC. Use of C-reactive
protein in minimizing antibiotic exposure: experience with
infants initially admitted to a well-baby nursery. Pediatrics
2000; 106: E4.
15. Bomela HN, Ballot DE, Cory BJ, Cooper PA. Use of
C-reactive protein to guide duration of empiric antibiotic
therapy in suspected early neonatal sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis
J 2000;19: 531-535.
|