|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57:914-917 |
 |
Epidemiological and
Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 in Indian Children in the
Initial Phase of the Pandemic
|
Bhakti Sarangi, Venkat Sandeep Reddy, Jitendra S Oswal, Nandini
Malshe, Ajinkya Patil, Manojit Chakraborty and Sanjay Lalwani
From Department of Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and
Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Correspondence to: Jitendra S Oswal, Professor, Department of
Pediatrics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital, Pune
411043, Maharashtra, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: June 08, 2020;
Initial review: June 19, 2020;
Accepted: July 28, 2020.
Published online: July 28, 2020;
PII: S097475591600218
|
Objective: To assess the epidemiological and clinical
characteristics of pediatric inpatients with COVID-19, early in the
pandemic. Methods: Clinical and laboratory profile and outcomes
were studied for children (aged 1 month - 18 years) presenting between 1
April, 2020 and 20 May, 2020 with positive nasopharyngeal swab for
SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Results: 50 children (56% male) with median
(IQR) age of 6 (2-12) years were included. Majority (56%) were from
families belonging to Kuppuswamy upper lower socioeconomic class. 45
(90%) had positive household contact, and 33 (66%) had overcrowding at
home. 29 (58%) children were asymptomatic while 20 (40%) had mild
symptoms. Fever, cough, and sore throat were the most common symptoms.
High C-reactive protein levels were seen in 15 (30%) children. There was
no mortality. Conclusion: The disease burden appears high in
lower socio-economic group with majority having a positive household
contact. Milder disease pattern in the pediatric age group is
reiterated.
Keywords: Management, RT-PCR, SARS-CoV-2, Symptoms, Outcome.
|
C oronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been in circulation for more
than six months now [1]. Though there have been a growing number
of studies focused on COVID-19, limited data is available on
epidemiological features, clinical manifestations, and
transmission patterns in children with COVID-19, more so from
India. Early observations in a pandemic are pivotal in improving
the understanding of the physiological patterns and varied
clinical profiles, so as to improve early recognition and
appropriate management. We, therefore, describe the clinical and
epidemiological features of pediatric patients seen at a single
tertiary-care institution.
METHODS
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in
a dedicated pediatric COVID-19 center in Pune, Maharashtra
between 1 April, 2020 and 20 May, 2020. Prior approval was taken
from the institutional ethics committee. All children between
one month and 18 years of age who tested positive by the RT- PCR
technique for nasopharyngeal swab were included in the study –
these also included asymptomatic children as per the management
guidelines in force. Written informed consent was taken from the
parents of all children and assent was taken from children who
were greater than 9 years of age. Detailed information including
demographic data, travel and contact history, living conditions
and overcrowding, symptoms, and presence of co-morbid conditions
were taken. The children were examined and categorized as per
degree of severity based on standard criteria [2].
Baseline laboratory parameters (complete
hemogram and C-reactive protein) were evaluated and repeated as
required. Chest radiograph was done in all symptomatic children.
On chest X-ray each lung was divided into three zones.
Each zone was given a score of 1 if there was any opacity and 0
if there were none. Total score of 3 was considered as 50%
involvement [3]. All children admitted were managed as per the
hospital protocol. The children were monitored daily for changes
in disease severity. Discharge from hospital was as per
prescribed World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines which
stated that asymptomatic children who tested negative for two
nasopharyngeal swabs taken 24 hours apart after day 14 of
illness were fit for discharge [4]. Overcrowding was defined
based on persons per room criteria [5].
Statistical analyses: The data were
analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) software version 25.0. Spearman’s Rho correlation
coefficient was used to determine the correlation with disease
severity. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
A total of 178 children presented to us with
suggestive features during the study duration, of which, 153
were negative and 25 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.
Another 25 children with a positive RT-PCR were referred from
other hospitals. Thus, a total of 50 children (56% males) with
median (IQR) age of 6 (2-12) years were included. Majority (82%)
of the cases hailed from containment zones in Pune. There was
history of positive household contact in 45 (90%) children; with
42 having family members with mild illness and three with severe
illness. Travel history to affected area was documented in only
one child (Table I).
Table I Epidemiological and Clinical Characteristics of Children With SARS-CoV-2
Infection in Pune, 2020 (N=50)
Parameters |
No. (%) |
Male |
28 (56) |
Age
|
|
1 mo to 1 y |
9 (18) |
>1 to 5 y |
15 (30) |
>5 to 10 y |
12 (24) |
>10 to 15 y |
11 (22) |
>15 to 18 y |
3 (6) |
Weight-for-age (3-97centile) |
45 (90) |
Overcrowding |
33 (66) |
Contact with patient of COVID- 19
|
45 (90) |
Socio-economic status*
|
|
Upper lower |
28 (56) |
Lower middle |
17 (54) |
Upper middle |
5 (10) |
Severity of illness |
|
Asymptomatic |
29 (58) |
Mild |
20 (40) |
Moderate |
1 (2) |
Severe |
0 (0) |
Symptoms |
|
Fever |
17 (34) |
Cough |
8 (16) |
Sore throat |
7 (14) |
Myalgia |
4 (8) |
Diarrhea |
2 (4) |
Headache |
2 (4) |
*As per Kuppuswamy classification; One child each
had rash and conjunctivitis. |
More than half (58%) of the children were
asymptomatic while 20 (40%) had mild symptoms. In symptomatic
children, fever was the chief complaint in 17 (34%). None of the
children had hypoxemia measured by pulse oximetry. Only two
children had co-morbidities; one child had history of simple
febrile seizures, and another had underlying type I diabetes
mellitus and had presented with diabetic ketoacidosis.
Immunization was complete in 32 (64%) of the children as per
universal immunization program, and 49 (98%) children had a BCG
scar.
The mean (SD) leucocyte count was 8864
(3727.2) X10 9/L
(range, 3300-19300 X109/L).
Leucopenia was seen in 3 (6%) children while leukocytosis was
seen in 13 (26%) children. Lymphopenia, eosinopenia and
thrombo-cytopenia were not seen in any child.
Neutrophil-lymphocyte-ratio (NLR) (r=0.35, P=0.01)
and lymphocyte-monocyte-ratio (LMR) (r=-0.31, P=0.03)
showed a significant correlation with the severity of the
illness, while platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (r=0.28,
P=0.06) and CRP (r=0.05, P=0.73) did not
show any correlation with severity of the disease.
Chest radiograph was done in 20 (95.2%) of 21
symptomatic children. It was found to be normal in 18 (85.7%),
while two showed bilateral lower zone haziness (<50%). The
disease category for all patients remained same all through the
hospital stay and no mortality was seen.
Table II Laboratory Investigations of Children With SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Pune, 2020 (N=50)
Parameter |
Value |
Absolute neutrophil count (x 109/L) |
2480 (1995.5-3339) |
Absolute lymphocyte count (x 109/L) |
4071 (2912-5964) |
Absolute monocyte count (x 109/L) |
576 (402.5-744) |
Absolute eosinophil count (x 109/L) |
156 (68.5-437.5) |
Leucopenia* |
3 (6) |
High C-reactive protein* |
15 (30) |
All values in median (IQR) except *no.(%);
leucopenia-leucocyte count <4000×109/L; High C-reactive
protein- value >6 mg/dL. |
DISCUSSION
Majority of children in our study were
detected in the identified containment zones, most of them
reporting exposure to a positive household contact. Majority of
the children were either asymptomatic or had mild disease.
Most children were from lower socio-economic
groups, a pattern also witnessed in other countries [6]. Though
the disease was seen in all age groups, children less than five
years of age accounted for nearly half the cases. This can be
attributed to the inability of this age group to comprehend and
follow social distancing norms and their frequent close contact
with parents.
Pediatric observational studies published
early in the spread across China reported similar clinical
findings with fever being the most common symptom followed by
cough and sore throat [7]. A recent meta-analysis has also shown
that most of the patients have mild to moderate disease (96%)
with only 1% of all the symptomatic pediatric cases being
critically sick [8]. The reported mortality rate of COVID-19 in
children is less than 1% [9]. Various hypotheses have been
proposed for the lesser disease severity in children [10],
though a definite answer is still awaited.
Malnutrition has been deemed a risk factor in
adult COVID-19 [11]. In children, malnutrition is known to
foster infections; however, in this study, majority of the
children were well-nourished as per weight-for-age criteria. The
hematological profile of adults with COVID-19 has demonstrated
leucopenia with associated neutrophilia, lymphopenia;
eosinopenia and thrombocytopenia. Also, higher NLR, LMR and PLR
have been associated with severe disease and used for
prognostication [12]. Leucopenia, however, was seen in only 6%
of our children and there was no evidence of lymphopenia,
thrombo-cytopenia or eosinopenia. Increasing NLR in our study
showed a moderate positive correlation coefficient while LMR
showed a negative correlation. High CRP values have now become
synonymous with severe COVID-19 infection among adults as seen
in majority of the studies [13]. The value of CRP did not
correlate with disease severity in our study. These discordant
results may be due to the majority of our patients being
asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, or due to a different
history of antigen exposure and immune response.
Repeat RT-PCR of nasopharyngeal swab was done
on day 14 and 15 to check for infectivity status. All the
children except one tested negative by RT-PCR on both the days.
For the child who tested positive for one swab, a repeat swab
was negative after three days, thus indicating that clearance of
viral load may vary in different individuals. The degree of
infectivity of these individuals after 14 days remains
questionable as RT-PCR detects genetic fragments of the virus
and cannot distinguish between dead or live virus [14]. In such
scenarios, doing a viral culture may be the plausible method of
detecting live virus and demonstrating continued infectivity. As
performing a viral culture is difficult and requires advanced
laboratory facilities, using GeneXpert platform with (cycle
threshold) Ct values
³ 24 may also be beneficial for predicting
lack of infectivity [15].
The findings of our study are limited by the
size of the cohort and may require further validation by a study
with a larger sample size. Being a study in the initial phase of
the pandemic with lockdown in place, it may not cover the entire
spectrum of clinical presentations, severity and magnitude of
SARS-CoV-2 in children from different geographical areas. We
could also not collect data for calculation of body mass index
(BMI) and Z-scores.
In conclusion, our study shows that there is
a higher disease burden in lower-socioeconomic groups with
majority of children having a positive household contact. A
milder disease pattern is seen in majority of children with
COVID-19.
Ethical approval: Institutional Ethics
Committee of Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College and Hospital;
No. BVUDMC/IEC/1B, dated 10 April, 2020.
Contributors: VSR,BS,AP,MC: management of
the patients; VSR,BS: collected the data, reviewed the
literature and drafted the first version of the manuscript;
BS,JSO,NM,SL: conceptualized the study, reviewed the literature,
revised the manuscript and critically reviewed the manuscript.
All authors contributed to manuscript preparation and approved
the final version of the manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interests:
None stated.
|
What This Study Adds?
• Majority of Indian children with SARS-CoV-2
infection had a mild course of disease during the
initial stages of the pandemic.
|
REFERENCES
1. Riou J, Althaus CL. Pattern of early
human-to-human transmission of Wuhan 2019 novel coronavirus
(2019-nCoV), December 2019 to January 2020. Euro Surveill.
2020;25:2000058
2. Guidelines On Clinical Management Of
COVID-19. Government of India Ministry of Health & Family
Welfare Directorate General of Health Services (EMR Division),
pp.3-5. Available at:
https://www.mohfw.gov.in/pdf/GuidelinesonClinicalManagementofCOVID
1912020.pdf. Accessed July 27, 2020.
3. Toussie D, Voutsinas N, Finkelstein M,
Cedillo M, Manna S, Maron S, et al. Clinical and chest
radiography features determine patient outcomes in young and
middle age adults with COVID-19. Radiol. 2020;201754.
4. Global Surveillance for human infection
with novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV). Available from:
https://www.who.int/publications-detail/global-surveillance-for-human-infection-with-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov).
Accessed June 20, 2020
5. Park K. Environment and Health. In:
Park K, ed. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine.
23rd ed. Jabalpur: Bhanot Publishers; 2015.p.758.
6. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020. Available
from:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/
racial-ethnic-minorities.html. Accessed June 20, 2020.
7. Qiu H, Wu J, Hong L, Luo Y, Song Q, Chen
D. Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang, China: An
obser-vational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:689-96.
8. Meena J, Yadav J, Saini L, Yadav A, Kumar
J. Clinical features and outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in
children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatr.
2020 Jun 24. S097475591600203 [Epub ahead of print].
9. COVID-19: Data Summary - NYC Health.
Available from: https://www1.nyc.gov/site/ doh/covid/
covid-19-data.page. Accessed June 20, 2020
10. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S,
Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell
entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically
proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271-80.e8
11. Li T, Zhang Y, Gong C, Wang J, Liu B, Shi
L, et al. Prevalence of malnutrition and analysis of
related factors in elderly patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan,
China. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:871-9.
12. Lagunas-Rangel FA. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte
ratio and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio in patients
with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A
meta-analysis. J Med Virol. 2020;10.1002/jmv.25819 [published
online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 3].
13. Wang L. C-reactive protein levels in the
early stage of COVID-19. Med Mal Infect. 2020;50:332-4.
14. Lauri A, Mariani PO. Potentials and
limitations of molecular diagnostic methods in food safety.
Genes Nutr. 2008;4:1-12.
15. Bullard J, Dust K, Funk D, Strong JE,
Alexander D, Garnett L, et al. Predicting infectious
SARS-CoV-2 from diagnostic samples. Clin Infect Dis.
2020;ciaa638 [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 22].
|
|
 |
|