reminiscences from Indian Pediatrics: A tale
of 50 years |
|
Indian Pediatr 2015;52:
881-882 |
 |
Tetanus – A Tale of 50 Years
|
Preeti Singh and *Anju
Seth
Department of Pediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi,
India.
Email: [email protected]
|
October
1965 issue of Indian Pediatrics comprised of 41 pages, including
five original research papers. Amongst these, we decided to review the
article on "Tetanus in infancy and childhood" [1], considering that
patients with tetanus still continue to be admitted at Indian hospitals
despite free availability of a highly efficacious and safe vaccine. We
also present the current status of tetanus epidemiology and the changes
in its management since publication of the reviewed research paper 50
years ago.
The Past
The study by Saxena, et al. [1], published
in October 1965 issue of Indian Pediatrics, is a retrospective review of
records of admitted cases at PBM group of hospitals at Bikaner from
January 1945 to June 1965. The authors have presented a profile of 175
tetanus cases in infancy and childhood (age 1 mo to 12 y, excluding
neonatal tetanus), and assessed factors associated with mortality. The
cases were classified into five grades depending upon presence of five
severity criteria that included: (i) presence of lockjaw, (ii)
presence of spasms, (iii) incubation period of
£ 7 days, (iv)
time interval between the appearance of first symptom and spasm of < 48
hours, and (v) axillary temperature of >99
oF within 24 hours of admission. The cases were
categorized into grades I to V depending upon number of criteria
present. Tetanus constituted 0.5% of the pediatric admissions in the
reported period. A mortality rate of 32.2% was observed. Majority
(44.4%) of cases belonged to clinical grade IV while the highest
mortality (62.5%) was observed in grade V. There were two peaks observed
– at ages 4 and 10 years – corresponding to periods of increased
susceptibility to infection and trauma. In more than one-third of cases,
the probable source of infection was unknown, while trauma and ear
infection were responsible for 34.8% and 23.6% cases, respectively. The
mortality rate was highest (66.6%) in cases where the focus of injury/
infection was the face, neck and scalp, and lowest in the group with
otorrhea (26.3%). The average incubation period – recorded in 78 cases
where the information was available – was 13.4 days with maximum deaths
observed in cases with incubation period < 7 days. Besides short
incubation period, onset of spasms within 24 hours of illness, severe
spasms and temperature >99 oF
within 24 hours of admission were the factors associated with grave
prognosis. Most (96.8%) deaths occurred within first week of admission.
No significant difference in mortality was recorded with different
dosage schedules of anti-tetanus serum (ATS) while the use of penicillin
was associated with improved outcome.
Historical background and past knowledge: After
Hippocrates’ primeval description of tetanus in medical literature, no
significant advancement in understanding occurred till the early 19th
century [2]. The causative agent of tetanus was identified by Rossenbach
[3] but isolation of Clostridium tetani is credited to Kitasato
in 1889 [4]. This gram-positive, spore-forming, motile, anaerobic
bacillus constitutes the normal intestinal flora of animals. As the
spores are ubiquitous and persist for long time in the soil, these can
easily contaminate wounds. Thus, any non- or partially-vaccinated
individual is vulnerable to develop tetanus. In 1897, Edmond Nocard
established the role of tetanus anti-toxin in inducing passive immunity
in humans. Nearly three decades later, tetanus toxoid – developed by
Descombey in 1924 – was widely used during World War II. The use of
tetanus toxoid as a combined vaccine in the form of DPT (Diphtheria,
Pertussis and Tetanus) was licensed in 1949. In the pre-vaccination era,
the true burden of tetanus was largely unknown as most neonatal births
and deaths occured at home without an account of the either event.
The Present
Although DPT was introduced in 1950s, it became part
of Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) only in 1974. In the
meanwhile, tetanus remained widely prevalent. In 1980’s, a significant
proportion of global under-five mortality was attributed to tetanus
(more than 1 million deaths every year), two-third of this being
contributed by neonatal tetanus [5]. With effective implementation of
the immunization program, the incidence of tetanus in the developed
countries declined sharply during the last three decades, though it
remained endemic in developing countries, particularly in Asia and
Africa. The incidence in these nations is inversely related to the
tetanus toxoid coverage of the population, and has direct relationship
with poor hygiene, child-care practices, and wound management. By the
end of 20th century, though there was a substantial decline in number of
tetanus cases in India with improved vaccination coverage [6], it still
constituted a significant burden on the health infrastructure,
especially as the case fatality rate continued to be high [7].
During 2000-2013, the global mortality rates for
tetanus declined by more than 30% with an impressive annual rate
reduction of 8.9% for neonatal tetanus [8]. India has also witnessed
reduced death rates from post-neonatal tetanus within last 5 years due
to improvement in management strategies, especially supportive care
provided to these patients [9]. In May 2015, India achieved the landmark
of elimination of neonatal and maternal tetanus [10], certification of
which requires incidence of less than 1 case per 1000 live births in all
districts of the country for two consecutive years. This has been
possible due to the sustained and diligent efforts in improving the
vaccination coverage in pregnancy, rate of institutional deliveries, and
promoting clean delivery and cord-care practices.
The risk factors associated with poor outcome in
tetanus have largely remained unchanged in last 50 years [7,9]. There
exists an inverse relationship between severity of disease and short
incubation period and the interval between onset of first symptom and
development of spasms. The autonomic dysfunction that usually appears in
the second week of illness, and other complications like aspiration
pneumonia and sepsis encountered frequently in individuals with
prolonged hospital stay or in those who are mechanically ventilated,
also contribute to mortality.
The use of ATS to neutralize the unfixed toxin has
been phased out and replaced by Tetanus Immunoglobulin (TIG). The
current recommendation is to use TIG early in course of illness as a
single injection (500-2000 U) intramuscularly. Its use via intrathecal
route has not been shown to provide any additional benefit [11]. The
earlier recommendation to use penicillin has been criticized as it may
inhibit the release of GABA, similar to the action of tetanospasmin
[12]. Currently, metronidazole has become the drug of choice, to be
given intravenously (30 mg/kg/day) every 6 hours for 10-14 days.
Benzodiazepines (diazepam and lorazepam) in view of the potent
anticonvulsant, sedative and hypnotic properties, continue as the
preferred drugs for treatment of the spasms in tetanus since last half a
decade [13], while use of barbiturates, phenothiazines, and meprobamate
is no longer recommended in view of their serious side effects.
Magnesium sulphate has emerged as an adjunctive drug in recent past with
an additional benefit of controlling the autonomic symptoms [14]. Its
use has been shown to reduce the dose requirement of benzodiazepines and
neuromuscular blocking drugs, as well as the need of mechanical
ventilation. Use of neuromuscular blocking agents is recommended in
experienced hands after securing the airway in an intensive care set up
if the above drugs fail to control spasms.
References
1. Saxena O, Saxena S. Tetanus in infancy and
childhood. Indian Pediatr. 1965; 2:363-70.
2. Hippocrates. Tetanus. In: Major HH, editor.
Classic Descriptions of Disease. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL, Charles C
Thomas, 1939. p. 148-9.
3. Rosenbach AF. ZurAetiologie des Wundestarrkrampfes.
Vorgetyrangen am. Sitzungslage des XV Congresses der Deutschen f.
Chirurgiezu Berlin 7 April 1986. Arch Klin Chir.1887;34:306.
4. Kitasato S. Uber den tetanus Bacillus. Z. Hyg.
Infektkr.1889;7:225-34.
5. Stanfield JP, Galazka A. Neonatal tetanus in the
world today. Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62:647-9.
6. World Health Organization. WHO Vaccine Preventable
Diseases Monitoring System 2015 Global Summary. Available from:
http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitor ing/en/globalsummary/countryprofileselect.cfm Accessed
September 3, 2015.
7. Tullu MS, Deshmukh CT, Kamat JR. Experience of
pediatric tetanus cases from Mumbai. Indian Pediatr. 2000;37:765-71.
8. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional,
and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to
inform post-2015 priorities: An updated systematic analysis. Lancet.
2015;385:430-40.
9. Mishra K, Basu S, Kumar D, Dutta AK, Kumar P, Rath
B. Tetanus-still a scourge in the 21st century: A pediatric
hospital-based study in India. Trop Doct. 2012;42:157-9.
10. India declared free of maternal and neonatal
tetanus. BMJ. 2015;350:h2975.
11. Abrutyn E, Berlin JA. Intrathecal therapy in
tetanus: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1991; 266: 2262-7.
12. Wassilak SGF, Roper MH, Murphy TV, et al.
Tetanus toxoid. In: Plotkin SA, Mortimer EA, editors. Vaccines.
4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2004. p. 745-81.
13. Okoromah CN, Lesi FE. Diazepam for treating
tetanus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2004;1:CD003954.
14. Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Loan TT, Thuy TT, Thwaites
GE, Stepniewska K, et al. Magnesium sulphate for treatment of
severe tetanus: A randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2006;368:1436-42.
|
|
 |
|