Due to the situation arising from the
ongoing coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic, the
erstwhile Medical Council of India (MCI), in its circular of
May 22, 2020, relaxed the norms for appointment of external
examiners in postgraduate examination and permitted partial
online examinations. We recently successfully conducted the
MD Pediatrics exit examinations online, and wish to share
our experience.
All theory papers, practical/clinical,
objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), and
oral/viva-voce examination were conducted in early-May, 2020
with strict observance of social distancing and other
measures to prevent COVID-19 transmission. Although the
theory examination (clinical vignettes based) did not pose
much challenge, conducting the practical examination in
compliance with the norms was an uphill task. Two external
examiners were in the examination board to conduct and
supervise the practical examination on the online video
platform Skype. A mixed approach was followed in which both
the internal examiner (physically present in the examination
room) and external examiners (online) were involved in
assessment by face-to-face, real-time online evaluation.
Every possible effort was made to include all essential
components from a traditional practical exit examination,
including clinical cases, OSCEs, spot cases, and oral/viva
voce examination.
Practical examination was conducted over
two days under real-time video monitoring, supervision, and
active partici-pation by external examiners. Two desktop
system having inbuilt camera with high speed LAN connection
were setup in pediatric ward and NICU. A Skype group
consisting of all examiners was created. Pre-examination
meetings on skype involving all examiners were conducted
wherein examination components (OSCE, spot cases, short and
long cases) and strategy was discussed beforehand. The OSCEs
were designed to test all six domains of the Accreditation
Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) [1]. On the
day of examination, case presentation by examinees was done
in the traditional way except that the external examiners
were directing the examination process online, in real time
and virtually. Assesment sheets and final marks sheet were
shared and signed by e-mail. Both the external examiners
provided positive feedback on the overall examination
process and logistics. The overall expenses were less than
one-third of the conventional physical examination method.
Computer-based online testing in a
high-stakes examination of the medical curriculum is one of
the best ways to test the clinical skills of an outgoing
postgraduate, and in the current times of COVID-19 pandemic
it seems to be a feasible option in order to meet the
timeline of course completion [2]. Dearth of clinical
material due to COVID-19 lockdown may be addressed by mock
clinical situations, virtual case scenarios and high
fidelity mannequins.
Skype, Zoom, Webex meetings, Google Meet,
Team Viewer, and various other web conferencing platforms
have taken over medical education through webinars and
online teaching sessions during the COVID-19 pandemic, as
face-to-face classes are suspended in almost all places [3].
Boeve, et al. [2] demonstrated a similar score of
students in the computer-based examination, as compared to
paper-based examination and comparable acceptance by
teachers and students in the medical curriculum. The USMLE
and MRCPCH examinations are being conducted using online
testing methods since long.
Acceptance by examinees and examiners,
appreciation of clinical findings by external examiners,
need for extra software/hardware, technical glitches,
communication errors and other institutional barriers are
challenges to be considered while conducting such an
examination. Mock examinations, pre-examination meeting and
briefing of examiners conveying case details, and support
from the information technology department helped in
overcoming these challenges.
1. Witteles RM, Verghese A. Accreditation
Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones -
Time for a revolt? JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1599-600.
2. Boevé AJ, Meijer RR, Albers CJ,
Beetsma Y, Bosker RJ. Introducing computer-based testing in
high-stakes examinations in higher education:Results of a
field experiment. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143616.
3. Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The Impact of COVID-19 on medical
education. Cureus. 2020;12:e7492.