|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57:
1071-1072 |
 |
Effect of
Tactile-Kinesthetic Stimulation on Weight in Preterm
Neonates in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
|
Alice Jeba J,1*
Senthil Kumar S2
and Shivaprakash Sosale3
From 1Department of Pediatric
Physiotherapy and 3Department of Pediatrics, NRR
Hospital, Chikkabanavara, Bangalore, Karnataka,
India; and 2Department of Physiotherapy, Saveetha
University,
Thandalam, Chennai, India.
Email:
dralicejeba@yahoo.co.in
|
This study
evaluated the efficacy of tactile kinesthetic
stimulation on the weight of 40 preterm (28 weeks to
<37 weeks) infants. Experimental group received two
sessions per day of tactile-kinesthetic stimulation,
for 10 consecutive days along with routine hospital
care (RHC) and control group received only RHC.
Increase in mean (SD) weight gain was significantly
higher in the experimental group as compared to
control group [10.79 (0.62) g vs 4.03 (0.89)
g; P< 0.001].
Keywords: Developmental
care, Exercise, Growth, Massage.
|
Premature infants are exposed to
a stressful environment, high intensity noise, and
bright light continuously. They are deprived of
mechanosensory stimulation which they receive in
utero [1], constant tactile stimulus of amniotic
fluid, and are also exposed to various touch
stimulus during routine care [2]. Massage therapy
may help in facilitating weight-gain process. We
studied the efficacy of tactile- kinesthetic
stimulation on the weight of infants in a neonatal
intensive care unit (NICU).
This study was conducted in a
level III neonatal unit from May, 2019 to August,
2019, after ethical clearance from the institutional
ethics committee. All infants born between 28 weeks
to <37 weeks gestational age, and birthweight of
1000 g -2500 g and admitted in the NICU within the
first 48 hours were enrolled. Additional inclusion
criteria were: Apgar score >7 at 1 and 5 minute with
no resuscitation required at birth, and medically
stable with medical conditions primarily related to
immaturity (such as elevated bilirubin, mild
hypoglycemia and hypocalcemia). Those with genetic
anomalies, congenital anomalies, any infections, and
any evidence of intraventricular hemorrhage were
excluded. Enrolled infants were randomized by using
computer-generated random numbers to receive
tactile-kinesthetic stimulation and routine hospital
care (RHC) after 48 hours of their birth.
Experimental group infants received two sessions of
tactile-kinesthetic stimulation for 10 minutes each
day, for ten consecutive days along with RHC,
whereas the infants in the control group received
only RHC.
The stimulation protocol was
taken from field study in 1986 [4]. For the tactile
stimulation, the infant was placed in a prone
position. The researcher used the palms of the
scrubbed and warmed hands on the infant’s body while
the baby was in the incubator. The following five
regions of the infant’s body were then gently
stroked for five seconds, 12 times conse-cutively
(totalling one minute). From the top of the
neonate’s forehead down the side of the face to the
neck and back to the forehead; from back of the neck
across the shoulders and back to the neck; from the
upper back down to the waist and back up; from the
thighs down to the ankles and back to the thighs;
and from the shoulders to the wrists and back to the
shoulders. For the kinesthetic and proprioceptive
stimulation, the infant was placed in supine
position. This stimulation was given for five
minutes with five one–minute intervals. It included
six passive flexion and extension movements in the
right and left arm, the right and left leg and the
two legs together.
The weight of the babies from
both the groups were measured daily by digital
electronic weighing scale by the same nursing
assistant who was blinded about the allocation of
groups. The outcome of this study was the weight of
infants in the two groups after 10 days of
intervention.
A total of 46 preterm babies were
enrolled and forty infants completed the study. Both
the groups did not differ on the matched variables
of gestational age, birthweight, weight on day one
of the study, and 1 and 5 minute Apgar scores (Table
I). The mean (SD) fluid and calorie intake
in the infants of the two groups was also similar.
The mean (SD) weight gain after 10 days was higher
in the experimental group as compared to con-trol
group [10.79 (0.62) g vs 4.03 (0.89) g; P<0.001]
(Table I).
Table I Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes in Preterm Neonates Enrolled on the Study (N=40)
Variables |
Experimental
|
Control
group |
|
group (n=20) |
(n=20) |
Gestational age, wk |
33.8 (1.8) |
33.4 (1.5) |
Birthweight, g |
1848.7 (226.3) |
1830.8 (234.1) |
1-minute Apgar score |
7 (0) |
7 (0) |
5-minute Apgar score |
8 (0) |
8 (0.5) |
Baseline weight, g |
1809.5 (208.1) |
1779.1 (142.6) |
Weight gain day 1-5, g |
77.9 (35.09) |
79.6 (49.1) |
*Weight gain day 6-11,
g |
53.9 (3.9) |
20.1 (4.5) |
*Daily weight gain, g |
10.8 (0.6) |
4.03 (0.9) |
All values
in median (IQR) except weight gain in mean
(SD);*P<0.001. |
The present study assessed the
effect of tactile-kinesthetic stimulation on weight
of preterm infants and found a significant positive
effect on weight gain in the experimental group.
Small sample size due to time constraints,
recruitment from a single centre, and exclusion of
the factors which influence the energy expenditure
of the infants, were the major limitations of this
study.
White-Traut RC, et al. [5]
and Mathai, et al. [6] had demonstrated the
same benefit, when massage was combined with
kinesthetic stimulation or physical activity. Along
with weight gain, vagal tone and gastric motility
[7], and bone mineralization and skeletal growth are
also reported to improve [8-10]. Our findings
provide further evidence that tactile kinesthetic
stimulation improves weight gain in stable preterm
infants.
In conclusion, tactile-
kinesthetic stimulation for preterm infants between
28 to <37 weeks of gestational age had significant
effect on weight gain. Further clinical studies with
larger sample size to confirm the result obtained in
our study and to standardize the protocol are the
need of the hour.
Contributors: AJ, SK, SS:
conceived and designed the study; AJ, SS: were
involved in patient care, collected the data; AJ,
SK: analysis and interpretation of data, drafting
the manuscript. All authors approved the final
version of manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing
interests: None stated.
REFERENCES
1. Rai S, Rankin C. Reversing the
effects of early isolation on behavior, size and
gene expression. Dev Neurobiol. 2007; 67:1443-56.
2. Ramachandran S, Dutta S. Early
developmental care interventions of preterm very low
birthweight infants. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50:765-70.
3. Vandenberg, K A.
Individualized Developmental Care for High Risk
Newborns in the NICU: A Practice Guideline. Early
Human Dev. 2007;83:433-42.
4. Field TM, Schanbery SM,
Scafidi F, Bauer CR. Tactile-kinesthetic stimulation
effect on preterm neonates. Pediatrics.
1986;77:654-58.
5. White-Traut RC, Tubeszewski K.
Multimodal stimulation of the premature infant. J
Pediatr Nurs. 1986;1:90-5.
6. Mathai S, Fernandez A, Modkar
J, Kanbur W. Effects of tactile kinesthetic
stimulation in preterm. Indian Pediatr.
2001;38:1091-8.
7. Diego MA, Field T, Hernandez-Reif
M. Vagal activity, gastric motility, and weight gain
in massaged preterm neonates. J Pediatr.
2005;147:50-5.
8. Aly H, Moustafa MF, Hassanein
SM, Massaro AN, Amer HA, Patel K. Physical activity
combined with massage improves bone mineralization
in premature infants: A randomized trial. J
Perinatol. 2004;24:305-9.
9. Litmanovitz I, Dolfin T, Friedland
O, Arnon S, Regev F, Shainkin-Kestenbaum R, et al.
Early physical activity intervention prevents
decrease of bone strength in very low birthweight
infants. Pediatr. 2003;112:15-9.
10. Nemet D, Dolfin T, Litmanowitz
I, Shainkin-Kestenbaum R, Lis M, Eliakim A. Evidence
for exercise- induced bone formation in premature
infants. Int J Sports Med. 2002; 23:82-5.
|
|
 |
|