|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57:
1067-1069 |
 |
Compliance to Prescription of Routine Vitamin D
Supplementation in Infants
|
Pinky Meena, Amar Nath Saran, Dheeraj Shah and Piyush
Gupta *
From Department of Pediatrics, University College of
Medical Sciences & Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
We assessed compliance to routine
vitamin D supplementation in 330 infants (age 6 wk to 9 mo), who were
prescribed supplementation at birth. 137 (41.5%) had received vitamin D
supplementation at some point of time till enrolment. Median (IQR)
compliance to routine vitamin D supplementation was 66.7% (50%, 83.3%)
in those who ever received supplementation. Only 29 (8.8%) were
receiving appropriate routine vitamin D supplementation in terms of
dose, frequency and duration. There was low level of reinforcement (35%)
from healthcare workers and low parental awareness (34%) of the need of
supplementation.
Keywords: Adherence, Guidelines, Prevention,
Rickets.
|
Routine daily vitamin D supplementation in infants is
recommended by the Global consensus on rickets prevention, American
Academy of Pediatrics and the Indian Academy of Pediatrics [1-3].
However parental adherence is key to its success, which has been shown
to be sub-optional worldwide, resulting in poor outcome of the
supplementation [4-8]. There is no relevant Indian data. We conducted
this survey to estimate the proportion of infants adhering to
prescription of routine vitamin D supplementation between birth and 9
months of age.
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the
department of pediatrics of a public medical college-affiliated hospital
in Delhi. An approval from the institutional ethics committee was
obtained. Considering parental adherence of 68.9% [4], with alpha error
of 5%, absolute precision of 5%, and confidence level of 95%, 330
mother-infant pairs were required to be enrolled. Healthy infants
between 6 weeks to 9 months of age, who were prescribed vitamin D at
birth, were recruited from the immunization clinic, after obtaining
written informed consent from the mother. We included only those infants
who were born in a health facility and having documents showing
prescription of vitamin D at birth. The hospital policy is to prescribe
routine vitamin D supplementation at the time of discharge from the
health facility at birth. Term and preterm infants are prescribed 400 IU
and 800 IU vitamin D, to be given daily till 12 months of age,
irrespective of mode of feeding. No specific measures for reinforcement
of supplementation are in place on follow-up.
Baseline socio-demographic information was recorded.
Mothers were asked whether they are still providing routine vitamin D
supplementation to their infant. If not, whether they administered
vitamin D to their child at any time and if yes, for how long along with
the dose. Compliance was the duration for which supplementation was
given as a proportion of the duration of prescription till enrolment. We
also ascertained the proportion of infants who had received oral vitamin
D supplementation (400 IU) in last 7 days and in previous month, to
minimize recall bias.
Parental understanding of the prescription was also
assessed for their knowledge regarding total duration for which they
needed to give the supplement. Parents were asked whether they were
explained verbally by the healthcare worker about routine vitamin D
supplementation, the reason for its requirement and method to give it;
and whether they received reinforcement for same in their subsequent
health visits, if any. They were asked whether they received vitamin D
from the health facility, or it incurred out of pocket expenditure. In
case of non-compliance of the prescription, the parents were asked for
the reason. After the interview, mothers were advised to follow routine
supplementation of vitamin D, if they were not giving it earlier. The
practices of routine vitamin D supplementation were compared between
groups using chi square test. Compliance was compared between groups
using the independent samples Mann-Whitney U test. A P value of
<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
We interviewed 330 mothers between March and August,
2019. The median (IQR) age of their infants was 3.5 (2.5, 6) months, 190
(57.6%) were <6 months of age, and 180 were boys. Majority of mothers
were literate (288, 87.3%) and home-makers (307, 95.5%). Most families
(233, 70.6%) belonged to lower socioeconomic strata; 85 (25.8%) were
from middle socioeconomic group. Most (300, 91%) infants were born at
term, 117 (35.5%) were low birthweight and 36 (10.9%) had required
admission in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at birth. The study
population did not have any infant with active rickets.
Overall, 137/330 (41.5%) infants received vitamin D
supplementation at some point of time till enrolment; median (IQR)
duration of vitamin D supplementation in 137 infants was 60 (30, 105)
days. Only 52 (15.8%) children were receiving vitamin D continuously for
7 days in the last week. Thirty-six (26.3%) of those practicing routine
supplementation (n=137) did not receive vitamin D in last 7 days,
and 25 (18.3%) did not receive it anytime over last one month. Median
(IQR) compliance to routine vitamin D supplementation in these 137
infants was 66.7% (50%, 83.3%). Only 29 (8.8%) infants were receiving
appropriate routine vitamin D supplementation in terms of dose,
frequency and duration. A significantly higher proportion of preterm
infants and NICU graduates received vitamin D supplementation (ever,
within 7 days and within 4 weeks) as compared to term and those not
requiring NICU care, respectively (Table I). The
compliance was also significantly higher in preterm and NICU graduates.
There were no significant differences in supplementation practices or
compliance according to gender or feeding status.
Table I Adherence to Routine Vitamin D Supplementation in Infants (n=330)
Category |
Ever received |
Received vitamin D |
Received vitamin D |
Compliance (%) |
|
vitamin D |
in last 7 days |
in last 4 weeks |
Median (IQR) |
Gender |
|
|
|
|
Male (n=180) |
71 (39.4) |
50 (27.8) |
57 (31.7) |
66.7% (60.0%, 77.5%) |
Female (n=150) |
66 (44.0) |
51 (34.4) |
55 (36.7) |
66.7% (66.7%, 81.5%) |
P value |
0.47 |
0.27 |
0.34 |
0.71 |
Gestation |
|
|
|
|
Preterm (n=30) |
25 (83.3) |
20 (66.7) |
19 (63.3) |
83.3% (66.7%, 85.7%) |
Term (n=300) |
112 (37.3) |
81 (27.0) |
94 (31.3) |
66.7% (50%, 82.2%) |
P value |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.026 |
Admission history |
|
|
|
|
NICU (n=36) |
31 (86.1) |
26 (72.2) |
27 (75.0) |
80% (66.7%, 86.6%) |
Non-NICU (n=294) |
106 (36.1) |
75 (25.5) |
86 (29.3) |
66.7% (50%, 83%) |
P value |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
0.020 |
Mode of feeding |
|
|
|
|
*Exclusively breastfed (n=190) |
94 (49.5) |
72 (37.9) |
83 (43.7) |
66.7% (50%, 85%) |
Mixed fed (n=65) |
24 (36.9) |
20 (30.8) |
20 (30.8) |
66.7% (65.7%, 84.4%) |
P value |
0.08 |
0.30 |
0.07 |
0.43 |
Values in no (%) except
where stated otherwise; Compliance is calculated for infants who
have ever received vitamin D supplementation (n=137). *Mode of
feeding is depicted for infants <6 months age; compliance in
this category is calculated for infants <6 months who ever
received vitamin D supplementation (n=118). |
Of the 137 mothers who administered vitamin D to
their infants, only 67 (49%) had understanding of correct duration of
supplementation requirement. Verbal explanation regarding routine
vitamin D supplementation at initial discharge after institutional
delivery was reported by 115 (35%) mothers. Reinforcement during
previous follow-up healthcare visits was reported by 74 (22.4%) mothers.
Overall, 111 (33.6%) mothers were aware about routine supplementation.
Most parents (98%) incurred out-of-pocket expenditure for
supplementation.
Perrine, et al. [5] reported that even the
educated parents from USA fared poorly in adherence, which was 10.5% in
exclusively breastfed and 8.5% in mixed-fed younger infants. In another
study from USA, only 15.9% of breastfed infants received routine
supplementation [6]. Overall, 27.1% of US infants in 2009-2016 met
vitamin D intake guidelines and there was no increase in proportion of
infants who meet the guidelines over 5 years [7]. In 2011, a study in
Poland showed 82.1% and 60.2% of infants aged 6 and 12 months,
respectively, received daily vitamin D supplementation [8]. In 2017, a
study in 29 European countries collectively reported good (³80%
of infants), and low adherence (<50%) by 59% and 10% (3/29) countries,
respectively [9].
It is important to identify factors contributing to
non-compliance. It appears that providing the drug and information, and
monitoring adherence at surveillance visits could be important factors.
Previous studies have suggested to reinforce parental education
regarding supplementation and methods for reducing forgetfulness in
mother; and identification of risk factors for poor compliance in the
subsequent health visits to improve the outcome of routine
supplementation [4,9]. It is possible that better supplementation
practices and better compliance in infants born preterm and NICU
graduates in our study were the result of reinforcements they received
through more frequent follow-up in dedicated high-risk neonatal clinics.
This had limitation of being a single center study,
with probability of recall bias. Further research on identifying the
factors and finding remedies thereof are needed to improve adherence to
routine daily supplementation of vitamin D to infants. It is important
to note that this low compliance may offset the projected gains, based
on 70% prescription rate by the pediatricians in the same setup [10].
Results from different regions, and preferably cohort studies, will
provide more robust date to guide practice and policy.
Contributors: PG: conceptualized the study; PG,
DS, and PM: devised the methodology and wrote the protocol; PM and ANS:
collected data and reviewed the literature. PG, DS and PM: analyzed the
data. The manuscript was written by PM and ANS and edited by DS and PG.
All authors approved the final version of manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated
REFERENCES
1. Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, Specker BL, Thacher TD,
Ozono K, et al. Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention
and Management of Nutritional Rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.
2016;101:394-415.
2. Wagner CL, Greer FR. American Academy of
Pediatrics Section on Breastfeeding, American Academy of Pediatrics
Committee on Nutrition. Prevention of Rickets and Vitamin D Deficiency
in Infants, Children, and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1142-52.
3. Khadilkar A, Khadilkar V, Chinnappa J, Rathi N,
Khadgawat R, Balasubramanian S, et al. Prevention and Treatment
of Vitamin D and Calcium Deficiency in Children and Adolescents: Indian
Academy of Pediatrics (IAP) Guidelines. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54:567-73.
4. Arancibia CM, Reyes GML, Cerda LJ. Adherence to
vitamin D supplementation and determinant factors during the first year
of life. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2014;85:428-36.
5. Perrine CG, Sharma AJ, Jefferds MED, Serdula MK,
Scanlon KS. Adherence to vitamin D recommendations among US infants.
Pediatrics. 2010;125:627-32.
6. Taylor JA, Geyer LJ, Feldman KW. Use of
supplemental vitamin D among infants breastfed for prolonged periods.
Pediatrics. 2010;125:105-11.
7. Simon AE, Ahrens KA. Adherence to vitamin D intake
guidelines in the United States. Pediatrics. 2020;145: e20193574.
8. Pludowski P, Socha P, Karczmarewicz E, Zagorecka
E, Lukaszkiewicz J, Stolarczyk A, et al. Vitamin D supple-mentation
and status in infants: A prospective cohort obser-vational study. J
Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2011;53:93-9.
9. Uday S, Kongjonaj A, Aguiar M, Tulchinsky T,
Högler W. Variations in infant and childhood vitamin D supplementation
programmes across Europe and factors influencing adherence. Endocr
Connect. 2017;6:667-75.
10. Sharma N, Negandhi H, Kalra S, Gupta P.
Prophylactic vitamin D supplementation practices for infants: A survey
of pediatricians from Delhi. Indian Pediatr. 2020;57: 259-60.
|
|
 |
|