|
Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 265-267 |
 |
Effect of Silicon Gel Sheeting in Nasal Injury
Associated with Nasal CPAP in Preterm Infants |
Ayla Günlemez, Tonguç Isken*,
Ayse S Gökalp, Gülcan Türker and Engin A Arisoy
From the Section of Neonatology, Department of
Pediatrics; and *Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and
Aesthetic Surgery; Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine, Kocaeli,
Turkey.
Correspondence to: Ayla Günlemez, Cumhuriyet Mahallesi,
Sahil Caddesi, Deniz Sokak 3/6, Izmit, 41100 Kocaeli, Turkey.
Email: [email protected]
Received: July 21, 2008;
Initial review: August 18, 2008;
Accepted: December 15, 2008.
Published online 2009 April 15.
PII:S097475590800460-2
|
Abstract
We conducted this study to investigate the efficacy
of the silicon gel application on the nares in prevention of nasal
injury in preterm infants ventilated with nasal continuous positive
airway pressure (NCPAP). Patients (n=179) were randomized into
two groups: Group 1 (n=87) had no silicon gel applied to nares,
and in Group 2 (n=92), the silicon gel sheeting was used on the
surface of nares during ventilation with NCPAP. Nasal injury developed
in 13 (14.9%) neonates in Group 1 and 4 (4.3%) newborns in Group 2
(OR:3.43; 95% CI: 1.1-10.1; P<0.05). The incidence of columella
necrosis was also significantly higher in the Group 1 (OR: 6.34; 95% CI:
0.78-51.6; P<0.05). We conclude that the silicon gel application
may reduce the incidence and the severity of nasal injury in preterm
infants on nasal CPAP.
Key Words: Columella necrosis, Nasal Continuous
Positive Airway Pressure, Nasal injury, Silicon gel sheeting, Preterm
infants.
|
Nasal
continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) is a noninvasive form of
ventilation that is increasingly becoming popular as a method of
respiratory support in the newborn(1). One of the complications of NCPAP
application is nasal injury, ranging from edema to columella necrosis,
which may occur with all types of nasal prongs and NCPAP devices(2-8).
The present study was designed to explore the potential
protective effects of the silicon gel sheeting on nasal tissue during
NCPAP use. We hypothesized that the use of silicon gel sheeting on nares
could reduce the incidence and severity of nasal injury related to NCPAP
use in premature infants.
Methods
This study was designed as a prospective controlled
trial conducted in neonatal intencive care unit of Kocaeli University,
Medical Faculty Hospital between November 2005 and July 2007. The study
protocol was approved by the hospital’s Research Scientific and Ethics
committee. Parental informed consent was taken from all eligible infants.
Eligibility criteria were a premature infant who required NCPAP on
admission or was receiving NCPAP after any other type of initial
ventilation. Subjects were enrolled after they completed 24h of NCPAP.
Exclusion criteria were term gestation, nasal deformities, shock and
coagulation defect. SLE 2000 Ventilator Driver and Infant Nasal Cannula
Assemble for CPAP were used and driver was set up according to the
manufacturer’s instructions (SLE Ltd, Berlin-Germany). Patients were
randomized alternate day into two groups based on silicon gel sheeting
application during ventilation with NCPAP. Silicon gel sheeting (Epi-Derm
Silicon Gel Sheeting, 1.8 mm thick, Biodermis, Las Vegas, USA) was placed
on infant’s nares surface during ventilation. Nasal injuries were
described as bleeding, crusting, excoriation or columella necrosis. All
infants were monitored daily for the development of the injury until they
were weaned off NCPAP. The same plastic and reconstructive surgeon
documented the condition of the nose systematically, in a masked manner.
All patients with nasal injury were followed up for at least a month for
the development of columella necrosis. Data collected included age at the
onset and the duration of NCPAP ventilation, presence of nasal injury, the
time interval between the initiation of NCPAP and the onset of injury (in
days).
Statistical analysis was carried out using the
statistical package of SPSS version 10.1 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago,
Illinois, USA). Data were reported as frequencies or means with standard
deviations (SD). Categorical variables were compared using the chi square
test and continuous variables with Student’s t test. Logistic
regression analysis was carried out to determine the significant risk
factors associated with nasal injury (dependent-variable) using various
potential factors (birth weight, gestational age, duration of NCPAP
treatment and using silicon gel sheeting) identified as independent
variables during univariate analysis. P<0.05 was considered
significant.
Results
During the study period, 1084 newborns were admitted to
our 27-bed tertiary care unit. A total of 179 premature infants were
ventilated with NCPAP and all enrolled in the study. Of 179 infants, 87
(48.6%) received NCPAP treatment without using silicon gel (Group 1), and
the remaining 92 (51.4%) were ventilated after applying the silicon gel
sheeting (Group 2). There was no significant difference in the patient and
ventilation characteristics between two groups (Table I).
TABLE I
Characteristics of Ventilated Neonates
Parameters |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
|
(n=87) |
(n=92) |
Birthweight (g), mean ± SD |
1752±689 |
1776±715 |
Birthweight, n (%) |
≤1000g |
19 (21.8) |
23 (25) |
1001-1500g |
22 (25.3) |
22 (23.9) |
1501-2500g |
34 (39.1) |
35 (38) |
≥2501g |
12(13.8) |
12 (13) |
Gestational age (wk), mean±SD |
32.1±3 |
32.2±3.3 |
Mortality, n (%) |
5 (5.7) |
4 (4.3) |
Ventilation with nasal CPAP |
Age at onset (day), mean±SD |
2.7±3.2 |
2.2±3 |
Duration (day), mean±SD |
5.9±7.4 |
5.1±5.4 |
Nasal CPAP duration ≥7 days |
17 (19.5) |
18 (19.6) |
Application on admission, n (%) |
34 (39.1) |
42 (45.7) |
Application after extubation, n (%) |
53 (60.9) |
50 (54.3) |
* P >0.05 between
two groups for all characteristics . |
Study identified a total of 17 infants who developed
nasal injury related to the use of NCPAP. Incidence of nasal injury
calculated to be 14.9% (n=13) for Group 1 and 4.3% (n=4) for
Group 2 (OR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.1-10.1; P<0.05). Columella necrosis
occurred in 6 patients in Group 1(6.8%) vs 1(1.08%) patient in
Group 2 (OR=6.34; 95% CI: 0.78-51.6; P<0.05). The time interval
between the initiation of NCPAP and the onset of injury was 12.1±3.8 days
(median: 12, range: 7-21) in all patients. The infants with nasal injury
had a longer duration of NCPAP (19.6±10.6 days) than the infants without
nasal injury (4±3.3 days). Nasal injury developed at average of 10.8±3.1
days in Group 1 and 16.2±3.2 days in Group 2 (P<0.05).
Logistic regression analysis showed that the main
significant risk factor for the development of nasal injury was the
duration of NCPAP treatment. The other risk factors were lower birthweight
and gestational age (P<0.001). Using silicon gel sheeting was
associated with lower incidence of nasal injury (P<0.05).
Discussion
Our study investigated a group of preterm infants
receiving NCPAP with single NCPAP setup. We found that the nasal silicon
shield application not only reduced the nasal injury rates significantly,
but it also decreased the severity of nasal injury such as columella
necrosis. Yong, et al.(3) compared the incidence of nasal injuries
associated with the use of prongs or mask during NCPAP in VLBW infants.
They classified nasal injury as redness, bleeding, crusting, excoriation,
and narrowing of the passage, and found that the injury rates were 29% for
the prongs and 35% for the mask. They also found no significant difference
between the two methods of application. Buettiker, et al.(4)
reported 16 cases with nasal injury (1 severe, 8 moderate and 7 mild
injury) in 40 patients on different type of NCPAP systems.
The major underlying mechanism of nasal injury related
to NCPAP appears to be the pressure generated on the columella by the
prongs. Etiology is similar to the pressure sores. Pressure sores are best
defined as soft-tissue injury resulting from unrelieved pressure over a
bony prominence(9). There is maxillary spine behind the columella and it’s
surface is very small. NCPAP device causes the pressure on this area.
Increased pressure on the columella causes diminished circulation of blood
flow. This subsequently impairs tissue perfusion and leads to ischemia
along with tissue damage. Persistent erythema, dermal injury, edema, indu-ration
and finally an ulcer can occur. Relieving the pressure is the key to
healing and more importantly, the key to prevention. Traditionally, static
devices such as gel pads and mattress overlays are used to reduce pressure
and support surfaces(9-11). A silicone dressing can also be used to manage
pressure ulcers(10,11). Silicon gel sheeting is a soft and flexible
material. It reduces the pressure on columella, distributes pressure
around the nares and reduces friction between device and skin. Silicone
gel sheet can prevent trauma to the surrounding skin.
Infants during NCPAP should be closely monitored for
the development of nasal injury. In addition to adequate nursing and
vigilance, silicon gel sheeting can be applied to nares to reduce the
incidence and the severity of nasal injury that might originate from NCPAP
use in preterm infants.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
What This Study Adds?
• Silicon gel application may reduce the incidence and severity
of nasal injury in preterm infants on nasal CPAP.
|
References
1. Wiswell TE, Srinivasan P. Continuous distending
pressure. In: Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH, editors. Assisted Ventilation of
the Neonate. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003.p. 127-147.
2. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, Moss AL.
Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway
pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 75: 209-212.
3. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY. Incidence of nasal trauma
associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive
airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: a randomised
control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: 480-483.
4. Buettiker V, Hug MI, Baenziger O, Meyer C, Frey B.
Advantages and disadvantages of different nasal CPAP systems in newborns.
Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 926-930.
5. Shanmugananda K, Rawal J. Nasal trauma due to nasal
continuous positive airway pressure in newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 2007; 92:18.
6. Foster SJ. Nasal deformities arising from flow
driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal
Ed 1998; 78:157-158.
7. Smedsaas-Lofvenberg A, Faxelius G, Axelsson I,
Lagercrantz H. Nasal deformities at a UK hospital. Arch Dis Child Fetal
Neonatal Ed 1998; 78: 158.
8. Kopelman AE, Holbert D. Use of oxygen cannulas in
extremely low birthweight infants is associated with mucosal trauma and
bleeding, and possibly with coagulase-negative staphylococcal sepsis. J
Perinatol 2003; 23: 94-97.
9. Thomas DR. Prevention and treatment of pressure
ulcers: What works? What doesn’t? Cleve Clin J Med 2001; 68: 704-707,
710-714, 717-722.
10. Russell L. Physiology of the skin and prevention of
pressure sores. Br J Nurs 1998; 7: 1084-1096.
11. Maume S, Van De Looverbosch D, Heyman H, Romanelli
M, Ciangherotti A, Charpin S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft
silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II
pressure ulcers. Wound Manag 2003; 49: 44-51.
|
|
 |
|