|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 448-449 |
 |
The New INCLEN Diagnostic Tool – A Comment
Developmental Pediatrician’s Perspective
|
Alison Poulton and *Annapurna Sudarsanam
From Sydney Medical School Nepean, University of
Sydney and *Goulburn Base Hospital, New South Wales, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
|
With modernization comes associated pressure on
children to achieve ever higher academic standards. It is therefore
important to identify children who are struggling to meet expectations
but could respond to intervention. Attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) is one of the commonest reasons for academic
under-attainment worldwide [1], and the prevalence rates in India are
comparable to other countries [2]. As ADHD is a treatable condition, the
need for accessible diagnostic instruments – that are appropriate for
use in local setting – is readily apparent. Lack of universal education
and established pathways of communication with schools, combined with
poor awareness, make establishing the diagnosis a real challenge.
The INCLEN Trust has adapted the diagnostic criteria
of the American Psychiatric Association (DSM-IV TR) by rewording them to
make them more applicable to an Indian setting [3]. The development of
such a tool based on the DSM-IV TR criteria, and validation in the local
population, are major advancements to assist in diagnosis. This should
translate into increased awareness of ADHD, and ultimately to better
management of these children. The INCLEN diagnostic tool is divided into
sections A and B; section A derives directly from the DSM diagnostic
criteria. However, the fundamental principle of diagnosing ADHD is not
that the child meets the diagnostic criteria, but rather the presence of
pervasive functional impairment deriving from the core symptoms. This is
addressed in Section B of the tool. Recognition of the way that the
particular symptoms can lead to impairment would need to be emphasized
in the follow-through training in the use of the tool to prevent
overdiagnosis. This is particularly important when considering section B
item 4, that lists some modalities of functional impairment. For
example, the failure to form stable friendships may result from a child
not attending or listening to a playmate and therefore being bossy. A
short attention span may mean that the child gets bored and tries to
change the rules of the game. Alternatively a bored child may try to
make life more interesting by being deliberately annoying or playing for
attention. Children with ADHD tend to live in the present and not
consider the future. They may be prone to injury through not stopping to
consider the risks or consequences of an action. Their short term view
of life can place unreasonable stress on parents and teachers. For
example, a child may try to put off a task for as long as possible, on
the basis that every minute spent arguing is time well spent because
they are not doing the task. The fact that in the end it still has to be
done may not appear to have any relevance to the child. Similarly, when
punished the child may not be interested in the reason for the
punishment, which therefore takes away its effectiveness. Academic
underachievement may result from a short attention span and difficulty
with sustained concentration. When assessing the acuity of ADHD it is
also important to consider its impact on the child and the child’s self
esteem. In the absence of any biomarkers for ADHD, the diagnosis relies
on accurate history using multiple sources of information, including
parents, school and other caregivers. It is important to rule out
significant hearing loss, language impairment or intellectual disability
which in themselves can cause attentional problems and frustrations in a
child and result in disruptive behaviour. A large number of rating
scales – both paid and free – are currently available as screening tools
for ADHD and its co-morbidities. Within the Western world, the
diagnostic pathways rely on accurate information from the school
teachers and school counsellors through formal reports and rating
scales. These are combined with information from parents or carers
during history taking or through more objective parent rating scales.
Frequent association with significant co-morbidities
like learning difficulties, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct
disorder, anxiety, mood disorders, depression and sleep disorders, can
also aid in early recognition and treatment of ADHD. Hence, the
importance of accurately diagnosing the condition and intervening early
cannot be overemphasized. Management may involve a combination of behavioral interventions, extra help with learning, and in some cases
medications. We look forward to further validation studies on the use of
the INCLEN Diagnostic Tool in the general Indian population, including
children, preschoolers and adolescents.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
References
1. Polanczyk G, de Lima MS, Horta BL, Biederman J,
Rohde LA. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and
metaregression analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:942-8.
2. Juneja M, Sairam S, Jain R. Attention deficit
hyperactivity disorder in adolescent school children. Indian Pediatr.
2014;51:151-2.
3. Mukherjee S, Aneja S, Russell P, Gulati S,
Deshmukh V, Sagar R, et al. INCLEN diagnostic tool for attention
deficit hyperactivity disorder (INDT-ADHD): Development and validation.
Indian Pediatr. 2014;51:456-62.
|
|
 |
|