|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 445-446 |
 |
Meningococcal Disease Prevention in India
WESTERN PERSPECTIVE
|
Andrew J Pollard
Department of Paediatric Infection and Immunity,
University of Oxford, and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre,UK.
Email:
[email protected]
|
P ediatricians who care for children with
meningococcal disease know that it is a disease which is difficult to
recognise in its early stages, difficult to manage when the patient is
critically ill, and can have devastating consequences amongst survivors
[1]. Taken with the propensity for explosive epidemics of disease in
some parts of the world, including South Asia, its prevention through
vaccination is clearly an important goal for child health.
However, Indian data are sparse on the epidemiology
of meningococcal disease [2], and it is difficult to provide informed
comment on the potential use of meningococcal vaccines in the region.
Most documented cases have been caused by capsular group A [2], and it
is not clear why there is a relative lack of disease caused by other
capsular groups in the region; this picture has been largely mirrored by
experience in Sub-Saharan Africa. Epidemic disease in India has been
documented over the last century, and likely relates to the intermittent
emergence of highly invasive clones of capsular group A meningococci –
as in Africa – so that availability of a Meningococcal A vaccine is an
important public health need for the region for outbreak control.
Fortunately, in 2014, there is an unprecedented
opportunity for the global reduction of cases of meningococcal disease
caused by the major capsular groups of Neisseria meningitidis (A,
B, C, Y and W) as a result of the development and licensure – in various
parts of the world – of more than 10 new generation vaccines containing
meningococcal capsular polysaccharides conjugated to a carrier protein
(either alone or in combination with other antigens), or containing
subcapsular proteins from the organism.
The astonishing experience of the many high income
countries – which implemented programs with monovalent capsular group C
meningococcal (MenC) vaccines over the last one and half decades – is
that MenC disease has now almost disappeared, and the data indicate that
high efficacy is likely for quadrivalent (ACYW) meningococcal vaccines (MenACYW)
following its use in the United States [3]. Moreover, an Indian
glycoconjugate vaccine directed against capsular group A meningococci is
interrupting epidemic meningitis following its deployment across the
meningitis belt in Sub-Saharan Africa [4]. The main cause of
meningococcal disease in most high income countries is serogroup B N.
Meningitidis; a 4-component protein vaccine was recently recommended
for use in the UK to reduce cases of serogroup B meningococcal disease
[5], and the impact of this vaccine is eagerly anticipated. While other
meningococci only rarely cause disease, outbreaks of serogroup X
meningococcal disease in Sub-Saharan Africa are a cause for concern [6],
since no vaccine is currently available and development timelines for a
new product are long.
The licensure of each of these vaccines in the
various regional jurisdictions followed collection of a substantial body
of evidence demonstrating immunogenicity and safety, and the likely
effectiveness by extrapolation from the immune response data. In this
edition of Indian Pediatrics, Yadav, et al. [7] describe a
clinical trial of a quadrivalent meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccine –
undertaken in Delhi, Bangalore and Mumbai – which found the vaccine to
be both immunogenic and safe in both children (from 2 years of age) and
adults. The findings are expected, as the four meningococcal capsular
polysaccharides have been chemically conjugated to diphtheria toxin in
this vaccine; it has been used for almost a decade in the United States
and its impact has been evaluated by the US Center for Disease
Prevention and Control indicating up to 85% effectiveness against
disease [3]. The publication of clinical trial data on meningococcal
vaccines in this region provides important bridging from experience of
these vaccines elsewhere.
Key questions, not addressed in the paper by Yadav,
et al. [7] are the duration of protection following immunization
with this meningococcal vaccine and the impact on carriage of the
organism in the oropharynx, and thus the potential for induction of herd
immunity. Duration of protection against disease and carriage are
important in estimating how many cases can be prevented and thus the
potential cost-effectiveness of the vaccine. The impact of such vaccines
in high income countries may have resulted more from the excellent
direct and herd protection amongst adolescents and young adults than
from the short duration responses induced by the vaccination of young
children [8]. The reasons for these age-dependent differences in
immunity are not completely understood but may relate to developmental
differences in the immune system, or be driven by environmental factors.
There is also evidence of genetic control of the duration of protection
[9] which points to the importance of monitoring duration of protection
induced by vaccines in populations with differing genetic backgrounds.
With prevention of meningococcal disease using
glycoconjugate vaccines demonstrated elsewhere, bridging data on
immunogenicity in India, and leadership in this field from Indian
vaccine manufacturers, it is lamentable that there is so little
surveillance data available in India to inform policy, to determine the
need for programs and to direct the response to outbreaks.
Funding: None; Competing interest: AJP is
Chair of the UK Departments of Health Joint Committee on Vaccination and
Immunisation (JCVI) but the views expressed do not necessarily reflect
those of JCVI. AJP has conducted clinical trials of meningococcal
vaccines on behalf of Oxford University funded by the WellcomeTrust,
Novartis Vaccines, GlaxoSmithkline and Pfizer, but has no personal
pecuniary or other interests with any vaccine manufacturer.
References
1. Pollard AJ, Nadel S, Ninis N, Faust SN, Levin M.
Emergency management of meningococcal disease: eight years on. Arch Dis
Child. 2007;92:283-6.
2. John TJ, Gupta S, Chitkara AJ, Dutta AK, Borrow R.
An overview of meningococcal disease in India: knowledge gaps and
potential solutions. Vaccine. 2013;31:2731-7.
3. Cohn AC, MacNeil JR, Clark TA, Ortega-Sanchez IR,
Briere EZ, Meissner HC, et al. Prevention and control of
meningococcal disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-2):1-28.
4. Daugla DM, Gami JP, Gamougam K, Naibei N,
Mbainadji L, Narbe M, et al. Effect of a serogroup A
meningococcal conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT) on serogroup A meningococcal
meningitis and carriage in Chad: a community study [corrected]. Lancet
2014;383:40-7.
5. Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation.
Minutes of the meeting on 11th/12th February 2014. London: Department of
Health, 2014. Available from: URL:
https://www.gov.uk/government/policy-advisory-groups/joint-committee-on-vaccination-and-immunisation.
Accessed May 8, 2014.
6. Xie O, Pollard AJ, Mueller JE, Norheim G.
Emergence of serogroup X meningococcal disease in Africa: need for a
vaccine. Vaccine 2013;31:2852-61.
7. Yadav S, Manglani MV, Narayan DHA, Sharma S,
Ravish HS, Arora R, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a
quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-DT): A
multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, phase III clinical trial.
Indian Pediatr. 2014;51: 451-6.
8. Perrett KP, Winter AP, Kibwana E, Jin C, John TM,
Yu LM, et al. Antibody persistence after serogroup C
meningococcal conjugate immunization of United Kingdom primary-school
children in 1999-2000 and response to a booster: a phase 4 clinical
trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:1601-10.
9. Moore CE, Hennig BJ, Perrett KP, Hoe JC, Lee SJ,
Fletcher H, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the
Toll-like receptor 3 and CD44 genes are associated with persistence of
vaccine-induced immunity to the serogroup C meningococcal conjugate
vaccine. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:295-303.
|
|
 |
|