|
Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 487-492 |
 |
Normal Values of Liver and Spleen Size by
Ultrasonography in Indian Children |
Bhavna Dhingra, Suvasini Sharma, Devendra Mishra, #Reema
Kumari, *Ravindra Mohan Pandey and #Shailendra
Aggarwal
From the Department of Pediatrics and #Department of
Pediatric Radiology, Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya (Maulana Azad Medical
College),Geeta Colony, Delhi; and, *Department of Biostatistics, All India
Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, Delhi, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Devendra Mishra, Assistant
Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Maulana Azad Medical College, New
Delhi 110 002, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: December 1, 2008;
Initial review: January 12, 2009;
Accepted: June 3, 2009.
Published online: 2009
September.
PII:S097475590800697-1
|
Abstract
Objectives: To establish normative data for the
ultrasonographic measurement of liver and spleen size in healthy Indian
children.
Setting: Tertiary-care pediatric teaching
hospital.
Design: Cross-sectional, hospital-based study.
Participants: 597 healthy children between the
ages of 1 month to 12 years.
Measurements: Ultrasonographic evaluation for the
assessment of liver and spleen size. These were correlated with the age,
sex, height/length and weight of the participants.
Results: Normal liver and spleen length and range
were obtained sonographically. The liver and spleen length significantly
correlated highly with the height/length of the subjects (P=0.0001).
Conclusions: The study provides the normal values
of liver and spleen size by ultrasonography in healthy Indian children.
Keywords: Children, Liver, Measurements, Organometry, Spleen,
Ultrasonography.
|
Liver and spleen size vary widely according
to age. Many diseases can affect their size, ranging from infective
processes to malignant disorders(1,2). Palpation and percussion are the
standard bedside techniques to document liver and spleen size, but are far
from accurate to detect small increase in size(1,2). The spleen has to be
enlarged two to three times its normal size to be clinically palpable(3),
although it may be normally palpable in 15-17% of healthy neonates(4) and
10% of healthy children(3). Clinical assessment of hepatomegaly by
palpation and percussion has also been shown to lack both accuracy and
reliability(2).
Ultrasonography is a non-invasive, established, safe,
quick and accurate method for measurement of liver and spleen size(5). We
conducted this study to establish standards of liver and spleen length by
ultrsonography in healthy Indian children, based on age, sex and
somatometric parameters, as the available literature is scarce(6,7).
Methods
We enrolled 650 asymptomatic children between the
age-group 1 month to 12 years, visiting the out-patient department either
for routine immunization or accompanying their siblings, between January
to December 2005. Any child under evaluation for/ follow-up case of a
condition which could affect the size of the spleen or liver e.g.
viral hepatitis, malaria, hemolytic anemia, enteric fever, congestive
heart failure and malnutrition (Grade III and IV, IAP classification) was
not included in the study. It was ensured by detailed structured parental
history, examination and medical record review (if available) that these
children did not have any pre-existing suspected inflammatory, metabolic,
traumatic, collagen or hematopoietic diseases and malignancies, that could
affect liver and spleen size (excluded, n=11). Informed, written
consent was obtained from the accompanying caregivers/parents of all
children, and verbal assent taken from all children older than 5 year. No
child refused assent, whereas there were 42 parental refusals for
participation (in the majority due to lack of time to spare, 85.7%).
Baseline data including the age, sex, height/length and
weight were recorded for all the children in a structured performa. The
age was recorded to the nearest completed month. An electronic weighing
scale (accuracy 50 g) and a wall mounted stadiometer (1 mm markings) were
used to measure the weight and height/length, as per standard
methodology(8). In each child, the clinicians (SS) identified the
acromioclavicular and the sternoclavi-cular joints by palpation and marked
the midpoint of a line joining these two points– the midclavicular point.
A vertical line was drawn from the midclavicular point to the midinguinal
point and was defined as the midclavicular line (MCL). All clinical as
well as sonographic measurements were done with reference to this line(9).
Ultrasonographic evaluation: All the
children underwent an ultrasonographic assessment of the liver and spleen
size on the same day by a single radiologist (RK), who was unaware of the
clinical condition and the observations made by the clinician, using a
Philips Envisor® Color Doppler system with a multi-frequency 3.5 to 5 MHz
probe. The measurement of spleen length was the optically maximal distance
at the hilum on the longitudinal coronal view (between the most supero-medial
and the most infero-lateral points) as the spleen length at the hilum is
considered the most reproducible linear measurement(10). The liver length
was measured with the child in supine position and the section level along
the MCL was determined by simultaneous demonstration of the right kidney
as per standard methodology(11). The upper and lower points of the
measurement of the liver span were marked and then measured from the
sonographic image. The measurements were made during quiet breathing in
younger children and during breath-holding in older children. Neither
preparation nor sedation was used.
Statistical analysis: Differences of continuous
variables between two independent groups were assessed with the t
test and the non-parametric Mann–Whitney test; more than two groups were
assessed with analysis of variance. Association between spleen or liver
length and each of the three variables- age, height/length and weight was
assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient; to identify the exact
pattern of the relationship, non-linear regression analysis was performed.
Multiple regression analysis was applied in a backward stepwise fashion to
test the independent effect of all the factors on liver/spleen length. All
statistical analyses were performed by the biostatistician using STATA 10
software.
Results
Parents of a total of 650 children were approached for
enrolment in the study, of which 42 refused permission and 11 were
excluded. Thus, 597 children (347 [58.1%] boys) between the age-group 1
month to 12 years (mean [SD] age 56.5 [41.9] month) visiting the
out-patient department either for routine immunization (268, 44.9%) or
asymptomatic children accompanying their siblings (329, 55.1%) were
evaluated during the study. The median age was 48 month (range, 1-156
month). The age and sex distribution of the study population is shown in
Table I. The mean (SD) splenic length was 6.99 (1.36)
cm (males, 7.06cm; females, 6.88cm) and the mean (SD) liver length was
9.59 (1.98) cm (males, 9.63 cm; females, 9.54 cm). The spleen and liver
length of healthy children from 1 month to 12 year according to age and
sex is given in Table II. The spleen size and the liver size
increased significantly with the age (P<0.05). Liver and spleen
length correlated significantly with the height (r=0.84 and 0.73)
and weight (r=0.79 and 0.69). The regression analysis with
height/length as the independent continuous variable yielded a high
multiple correlation between spleen length and height/length (R 2=0.54),
and liver length and height/length (R2=0.70). Multiple regression analysis
with spleen length as dependent variable showed that both height (b
coefficient 0.038, SE 0.006, P=0.0001) and body surface area (b
coefficient 3.776, SE 1.68, P=0.02) had significant independent
positive association with spleen length; no significant association could
be seen with age (b
coefficient 0.0003, SE 0.003, P=0.91) or bodyweight (b
coefficient 0.006, SE 0.012, P=0.62).
Multiple regression analysis with liver length as dependent variable
showed that only height (b
coefficient 0.055, SE 0.007, P=0.0001)
had significant independent positive association with liver length; no
significant association could be seen with age (b
coefficient 0.003, SE 0.004, P=0.39), bodyweight (b
coefficient 0.214, SE 0.014, P=0.14) or body surface area (b
coefficient –1.593, SE 1.97, P=0.42). Thus, only height had
significant independent positive association with both spleen length and
liver length. The standardized ranges for ultrasound organometry of liver
and spleen in 1 month-12 year old children, adjusted for height/length and
weight is provided in Table
III.
TABLE I
Age and Sex Distribution of the Study Population
Age group |
Male |
Female |
Total |
1-<3 mo |
10 |
11 |
21 |
3-<6 mo |
26 |
09 |
35 |
6-12 mo |
28 |
23 |
51 |
1-<2 yr |
44 |
33 |
77 |
2-<4 yr |
79 |
53 |
132 |
4-<6 yr |
62 |
53 |
115 |
6-8 yr |
31 |
20 |
51 |
8-10 y |
35 |
27 |
62 |
10-<12 y |
32 |
21 |
53 |
Total (%) |
347 (58.1) |
250 (41.9) |
597 |
TABLE II
Liver and Spleen Length by Ultrasonography in Healthy Children (N=597)#
Age and Sex |
No. |
Liver length (cm) |
Spleen length (cm) |
|
|
Mean (SD)
|
3rd
centile |
97th
centile |
Mean (SD)
|
3rd
centile |
97th
centile |
1-<3 mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
10 |
6.5 (1.23) |
4.8 |
8.9 |
4.9 (1.44) |
3.7 |
8.7 |
F |
11 |
6.2 (0.66) |
4.9 |
7.2 |
4.5 (0.53) |
3.2 |
5.2 |
3-<6mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
26 |
7.1 (0.77) |
5.9 |
8.9 |
5.4 (0.61) |
4.4 |
6.6 |
F |
09 |
7.2 (0.94) |
5.3 |
8.0 |
5.5 (0.51) |
4.7 |
6.5 |
6-<12 mo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
28 |
7.5 (0.88) |
6.1 |
9.5 |
6.0 (0.86) |
4.4 |
8.3 |
F |
23 |
7.9 (0.92) |
6.3 |
9.6 |
5.6 (0.61) |
4.7 |
7.2 |
1-<2y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
44 |
8.6 (0.85) |
7.1 |
10.2 |
6.4 (1.01) |
4.7 |
9.8 |
F |
33 |
8.5 (1.51) |
6.3 |
11.1 |
6.1 (0.74) |
4.5 |
7.6 |
2-<4y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
79 |
9.0 (1.34) |
7.2 |
11.9 |
6.9 (1.01) |
4.1 |
9.3 |
F |
53 |
8.9 (0.97) |
6.9 |
11.3 |
6.7(0.74) |
5.3 |
8.3 |
4-<6y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
62 |
10.3 (1.27) |
7.3 |
14.7 |
7.4 (0.99) |
5.0 |
10.9 |
F |
53 |
9.8 (1.24) |
6.5 |
13.3 |
7.1 (0.90) |
5.2 |
9.3 |
6-<8y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
31 |
10.8 (0.94) |
09 |
12.3 |
7.9 (0.94) |
6.3 |
9.7 |
F |
20 |
10.9 (1.29) |
8.2 |
13.3 |
7.6 (0.99) |
5.5 |
9.5 |
8-<10y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
35 |
11.9 (1.08) |
10 |
14.1 |
8.2 (1.02) |
6.8 |
10.9 |
F |
27 |
11.7 (1.11) |
9.4 |
14.0 |
8.2 (1.02) |
6.5 |
9.8 |
10-<12y |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M |
32 |
12.6 (1.20) |
11 |
15.5 |
8.7 (1.84) |
6.3 |
11.7 |
F |
21 |
12.3 (1.39) |
9.7 |
15.2 |
8.7 (1.20) |
6.7 |
11.3 |
# M-males, F-female, No difference between sexes either in the spleen
size (P=0.11) or the liver size (P=0.57). |
TABLE III
Liver and Spleen Size Adjusted for Height/length and Weight on Ultrasound Organometry
Parameter |
No |
Age (mo) |
Sex ratio |
Liver size (cm) |
Spleen size (cm) |
|
|
mean (SD) |
(female/male) |
mean (SD) |
mean (SD) |
Height/length (cm) |
50-80 |
151 |
10.5 (6.7) |
90/61 |
7.6 (1.18) |
5.7 (0.99) |
81-100 |
174 |
38.4 (11.6) |
98/76 |
8.9 (1.14) |
6.7 (0.90) |
101-120 |
151 |
71.9 (17.5) |
90/61 |
10.3 (1.19) |
7.4 (0.99) |
121-140 |
87 |
114.7 (16.5) |
46/41 |
11.9 (1.18) |
8.3 (1.0) |
>140 |
34 |
141 (8.6) |
23/11 |
12.5 (1.32) |
8.8 (1.11) |
Bodyweight (kg) |
≤10 |
143 |
10.5 (7.0) |
59/84 |
7.5 (1.12) |
5.6 (0.90) |
10.1-20 |
310 |
50.1 (21.1) |
132/178 |
9.5 (1.38) |
7.0 (1.03) |
20.1-30 |
100 |
107.1 (20.3) |
44/56 |
11.5 (1.19) |
8.1 (0.99) |
30.1-40 |
33 |
134.5 (12.3) |
11/22 |
12.4 (0.92) |
8.6 (0.99) |
>40 |
11 |
141.8 (12.9) |
4/7 |
13.7 (1.02) |
9.4 (1.08) |
Discussion
Our results provide a standard set of normal range of
liver and spleen size according to weight, height, age and sex of the
children, as determined by ultrasonography. We also found height to be a
significant correlate of the liver and spleen size across all ages and
weights, in both the sexes.
The conventional method of recording the hepatic and
splenic size by clinical examination has been reported to lack both
accuracy and reliability(1,2,7,12-14). There have been quite a few
previous reports giving the standard sizes of liver and spleen by
ultrasound in children(5,6,9,11,15,16), but none has been done in Indian
population. Among the more recent ones, Rosenberg, et al.(9) and
Megremis, et al.(5) have provided ultrasonographic data on spleen
size in 230 and 512 children, respectively. Of the studies providing
normative data on both liver and spleen size, Safak, et al.(16)
studied 712, 7-15 year old children and provided data according to
bodyweight groups. Konus, et al.(15) studied liver and spleen sizes
for 307 children and provided the data in height-range and age-group
categories. Our results are comparable to these studies.
As the midclavicular line is known to vary widely when
evaluated by different observers, we pre-determined it for the sonographic
assessments, thus, consistency of measurement was ensured. A single
radiologist performing the ultrasonograhy removed the inter-observer bias.
There are also some limitations of our study. The number of subjects in
the age group 1-3 months and the number of females in the age-group 3-6
months was less than ten. Further, neonates, and children above 12 year
age were not included in the study population due to administrative
constraints. Although, many previous studies have published normative data
using similar small numbers(5,9), the small sample size in certain groups
may affect the generalizability of the values to these age-groups.
Nutritional anemia and malnutrition may be associated with organomegaly
and were not specifically excluded (except severe malnutrition and
clinically obvious anemia). However, by presenting the largest pediatric
series so far, we provide a more accurate assessment of liver and spleen
sizes in children, especially those in India.
In addition to size, there are several palpatory
characteristics of the liver and spleen (tenderness, liver edge,
nodularity and consistency of the surface, etc.) that contribute
significantly to the overall bedside assessment of the organomegaly. Thus,
clinical liver span remains a simple practical measurement of liver size,
also providing additional supplemental information, and the most
applicable in developing countries. The bedside assessment of liver and
splenic enlargement will not obviate diagnostic imaging when such
information is vital to further therapeutic management of the patient.
We believe that the results of this study can be used
as a practical and comprehensive guide to indicate the normal liver and
spleen length range for every child, according to his/ her age and body
habitus.
Acknowledgments
Dr KK Kalra, Medical Superintendent, Chacha Nehru Bal
Chikitsalaya, for the permission and logistic support to conduct and
publish the study.
Contributors: SS and DM conceptualized the study.
BD, SS and DM were involved in patient selection, enrolment and clinical
data collection. RK and SA conducted the sonographic evaluation. SS and BD
collated the results, conducted the literature search and drafted the
manuscript. DM supervised the conduct of the study and the manuscript
preparation. RMP was involved in the planning of the study, conducted the
statistical analysis, and reviewed the manuscript for important
intellectual content. All the authors were involved in the approval of the
final manuscript to be published. RK and DM would act as the guarantors
for the relevant portions of the manuscript.
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None stated.
What is Already Known?
• Ultrasound-based organometric data is available
for different population groups.
What This Study Adds?
• Ultrasound-based organometric normative data on
the liver and spleen size in Indian children aged 1 month to 12 year
is presented, and shown to correlate with the height/length of the
child.
|
References
1. Zhang B, Lewis SM. A study of the reliability of
clinical palpation of the spleen. Clin Lab Haematol 1989; 11: 7-10.
2. Joshi R, Singh A, Jajoo N, Pai M, Kalantri SP.
Accuracy and reliability of palpation and percussion for detecting
hepatomegaly: a rural hospital based study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004;
23: 171-174.
3. French J, Camitta BM. Splenomegaly. In: Behrman RE,
Kliegman RM, Jenson HB (ed). Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 17 th
ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 2004. p.1675.
4. Mimouni F, Merlob P, Ashkenazi S, Litmanovitz I,
Reisner SH. Palpable spleens in newborn term infants. Clin Pediatr (Phila)
1985; 24: 197-198.
5. Megremis SD, Vlachonikolis LG, Tsilimigaki AM.
Spleen length in childhood with US: Normal values based on age, sex and
somatometric parameters. Radiology 2004; 23:129-134.
6. Chen CM, Wang JJ. Clinical and sonographic
assessment of liver size in normal Chinese neonates. Acta Paediatr 1993;
82:345-347.
7. Singh K, Bhasin DK, Reddy DN, Koshy A. Liver span in
normal Indians. Indian J Gastroenterol 1985; 4: 73-75.
8. Swash M. Hutchison’s Clinical Methods. 20 th
edition. London: WB Saunders Company Ltd; 1995.
9. Rosenberg HK, Markowitz RJ, Koelberg H, Park C,
Hubbard A, Bellah RD. Normal splenic size in infants and children:
sonographic measurements. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 119-121.
10. Deligeorgis D, Yannakos D, Panayoton P. Doxiadis S.
The normal borders of the liver in infancy and childhood. Arch Dis Child
1970; 45: 702-704.
11. Dittrich M, Milde S, Dinkel E, Baumann W, Weitsel
D. Sonographic biometry of liver and spleen size in childhood. Pediatr
Radiol 1983; 13: 206-211.
12. Kirk RM. Clinical assessment of liver enlargement.
Indian J Gastroenterol 2004; 23: 163-164.
13. Halpern S, Coel M, Ashburn W, Alazraki N,
Littenberg R, Hurwitz S, et al. Correlation of liver and spleen
size. Determinations by nuclear medicine studies and physical examination.
Arch Intern Med 1974; 134: 123-124.
14. Barkun AN, Camus M, Green L, Meagher T, Coupal L,
De Stempel J, et al. The bedside assessment of splenic enlargement.
Am J Med 1991; 91: 512-518.
15. Konu Ûs
OL, Ozdemir A, Akkaya A, ErbaÛs
G, Celik H, IÛsik
S. Normal liver, spleen, and kidney dimensions in neonates, infants, and
children: evaluation with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:
1693-1698.
16. Safak AA, Simsek E, Bahcebasi T. Sonographic
assessment of the normal limits and percentile curves of liver, spleen,
and kidney dimensions in healthy school-aged children. J Ultrasound Med
2005; 24: 1359-1364.
|
|
 |
|