Home            Past Issues            About IP            About IAP           Author Information            Subscription            Advertisement              Search  

   
Correspondence

Indian Pediatr 2021;58: 690

Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Children: Few Concerns

Satvir Singh and Daisy Khera*

Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

Email: [email protected]


We read with interest the recently published research paper on dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children [1]. We have the following concerns related to the study.

The recommended approach for noninferiority trials is to perform both intention to treat and per protocol analysis and to conclude noninferiority if both analysis produce the same result [2]. Although we could infer from the study flow chart that per protocol analysis was done, but there could be doubt in the minds of the readers if modified intention to treat or per protocol analysis was done. The estimated sample size in the methods section is written as 39 per group whereas in the discussion section the intended sample size is written as 36 in each group. Bradycardia in dexmedetomidine group is mentioned as 17.4% in the results section as well as in the fourth paragraph of discussion section while it is mentioned as 14.4% in the first paragraph of discussion section.

We understand your concern of not giving bolus of dexmedetomidine in your study to avoid bradycardia and hypotension as it has been reported in many studies. There have been few pediatric randomized control trials in which bolus dose of dexmedetomidine was given and there was no difference in the occurrence of bradycardia and hypotension and they found that the rate of adequate sedation was higher in the dexmedetomidine group with lower requirement of rescue drugs and shorter onset of sedation time [3]. We are of the opinion that not giving bolus dose of dexmeditomidine could have been a contributory factor in non-establishment of non-inferiority of dexmedetomidine as compared to midazolam in your study, and this point could have been discussed in the discussion section.

REFERENCES

1. Gulla KM, Sankar J, Jat KR, et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated children: A randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:117-22.

2. Hahn S. Understanding noninferiority trials. Korean J Pediatr. 2012;55:403-07.

3. Koroglu A, Demirbilek S, Teksan H, et al. Sedative, haemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging examination: preliminary results. Br J Anaesth. 2005;94:821-24.


 

Copyright © 1999-2021 Indian Pediatrics