|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:
91-92 |
 |
Repetitive Eye Poking in an Infant – A Diagnostic Conundrum
|
Sarthak Das and Thirunavukkarasu Arun Babu*
Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of
Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Mangalagiri, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
Poor vision in a growing child can affect all domains of development
[1]. Early diagnosis of poor vision in infants is extremely challenging
as they are unable to express sensory loss or cooperate for clinical and
equipment-based testing [2]. We report one such infant who presented
with repetitive eye poking.
A 1-year-old female child born out of a second degree
consanguineous marriage presented with complaints of not picking up
objects, looking downwards without making eye contact, and with
repetitive eye poking since three months of life. There was no history
of head or ocular injury and no family history of visual impairment. The
infant was born at term following an uneventful antenatal period.
Infant’s growth and development were appropriate for age. Infant had
photophobia, bilateral nystagmus and sluggish pupillary reflex but was
able to fix and follow light at a distance of 30 cm. Slit lamp
examination revealed normal anterior segment and no evidence of
pigmentary retinopathy on fundus examination. Differential diagnosis
considered at this point were optic nerve hypoplasia, Leber’s congenital
amaurosis (LCA), high refractory errors, early onset rod-cone dystrophy,
achromatopsia and cortical visual impairment. Both scotopic and photopic
electroretinogram (ERG) were unrecordable. Brain MRI did not show any
abnormality. In view of poor vision since birth, nystagmus, normal
development, normal fundus, normal brain imaging and flat ERG, a
provisional diagnosis of LCA was made. Clinical exome sequencing showed
a homozygous missence variation in exon 9 of GUCY2D gene
(chr17:g.7915502G>A; Depth 60x) that results in the amino acid
substitution of glutamic acid for glycine at codon 597(p.Gly597Glu;
ENST00000254854.4) in the tyrosine kinase domain of the GUCY2D protein,
confirming diagnosis of LCA type 1. Child is currently under visual
rehabilitation therapy and follow-up. Genetic counselling during next
pregnancy identified the same defect in the fetus, leading to medical
termination.
LCA, an autosomal recessive disorder, is a rare cause
of congenital blindness with a prevalence of 2-3 per million, occurring
due to degeneration of retinal photoreceptor cells [1]. FDA approved
gene therapy (voretigene neparvovecrzyl) is available for those with
RPE65 mutation [4]. Infants present with progressive poor vision
since birth, nystagmus, photophobia, hyperopia, keratoconus and a
classic behavioral pattern, Franceschetti oculo-digital sign, which
involves repetitive poking, pressing, and rubbing of eyes with hand.
These oculo-digital mannerisms mechanically stimulate dysfunctional
retinal photoreceptors by production of phosphene, but can lead to
atrophy of orbital fat and enopthalmos [4]. Though characteristic of
LCA, oculo-digital sign can also be a nonspecific marker of poor vision
in infants.
Acknowledgement: Dr Pratyusha Ganne, Assistant
Professor of Opthalmology, AIIMS, Mangalagiri, for assistance in
managing this case and drafting this manuscript.
REFERENCES
1. Gogate P, Gilbert C, Zin A. Severe visual
impairment and blindness in infants: Causes and opportunities for
control. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011; 18:109 14.
2. Suppiej A, Marino S, Reffo ME, et al. Early onset
retinal dystrophies: Clinical clues to diagnosis for paediatricians.
Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45:168.
3. Han J, Rim JH, Hwang IS, et al. Diagnostic
application of clinical exome sequencing in Leber congenital amaurosis.
Mol Vis. 2017;23:649-59.
4. Takkar B, Bansal P, Venkatesh P. Leber’s congenital amaurosis and
gene therapy. Indian J Pediatr. 2018;85: 237-42.
|
|
 |
|