|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:38-40 |
 |
Economic
Burden of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in India
|
Moksuda Khatun, 1 Debadyuti
Datta,2 Avijit Hazra,3
Pramit Ghosh,4 Muhammad Bin Selim,5
And Rakesh Mondal1
From Departments of 1Pediatrics and 4Community
Medicine, Medical College Kolkata; Department of Pediatrics,
2NB Medical College and 5Kakdwip Super Speciality Hospital;
and 3Department of Pharmacology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital,
Kolkata; West Bengal, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Rakesh Mondal, Pediatric Rheumatology Unit;
Department of Pediatrics, Medical College Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: November 15, 2019;
Initial review: December 11, 2019;
Accepted: August 31, 2020.
Published online: September 16, 2020;
PII:S097475591600246
|
Background: Published Indian studies on the
economic burden of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are lacking.
Methods: A prospective observational study recruited pediatric
patients aged from 1 to 12 years with JIA in the pediatric rheumatology
clinic of a public sector tertiary care hospital. Direct healthcare
costs and indirect costs for transportation, accommodation of the
caregivers, and productivity loss for work absenteeism were assessed.
Results: The proportions of direct annualized cost assessed in 60
patients (mean (SD) age 8.46 (2.24) year) spent on outpatient visits,
blood tests, imaging investigations, other tests, medications and
hospitalization were 0.85%, 12.8%, 9.0%, 2.9%, 41.7% and 32.7%,
respectively. Direct healthcare costs for blood tests and medicine were
lowest in oligoarticular JIA and highest in systemic onset JIA and
(P=0.043 and 0.001 respectively). The direct and indirect costs were
higher with the use of biologic agents (n=9) than in those
without (n=51). Conclusions: JIA imposes considerable
economic burden with the largest share attributable to medicines, and
maximum in those with systemic onset JIA.
Keywords: Cost analysis, Biologic agents, Pharmacoeconomic
study, Financial burden, Medication cost.
|
J uvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the
commonest rheumatic disorder in children, imposes a formidable
burden on patients and caregivers in terms of reduced quality of
life and economic hardship [1,2]. The financial burden is
attributable to the cost of multiple clinic visits, laboratory
tests, imaging investigations, expensive medications
(biologics), occasional hospitalization, and work-absenteeism.
The burden is particularly severe for patients with systemic
onset JIA (sJIA) [1]. Literature on the economic burden of JIA
are available from other countries [2,3] but are lacking from
India. We, therefore, conducted this pharmaco-economic study of
JIA patients attending a public sector hospital.
METHODS
This observational study was conducted
between April, 2017 and March, 2018, in the pediatric
rheumatology clinic of a tertiary-care teaching hospital in
Eastern India. Patients aged 1-12 years and diagnosed with JIA
were included after taking written informed consent from either
parent. The study protocol was approved by the institutional
ethics committee. The sampling strategy was purposive as
children not accompanied by caregivers within the family and
those with limited follow-up visits for at least 12 months were
excluded. JIA subgroups were categorized as oligoarticular,
polyarticular, systemic onset (sJIA), enthesitis related and
undifferentiated.
Data were collected over a period of 12
months for direct healthcare costs and indirect costs. Direct
healthcare costs covered six elements; out-patient clinic (OPD)
visits, blood tests, imaging investigations, other tests,
medications, and hospitalization. Most of the medications,
investigations and hospitalization did not incur any costs as
per the hospital’s policy. The medication cost was calculated
from the centralized procurement cost of the generic medicines
supplied. The market prices of the brands supplied were
considered at 20% discount for medicines supplied through local
purchase. The cost of laboratory and imaging investi-gations
were imputed from the government approved rates when offered by
authorized public-private partnership units. The actual cost of
investigations was recorded if done from outside. OPD visit
costs were calculated at actuals which included the OPD
registration charges and the expenditure on food and drink
during the waiting time. Cost of hospitalization was applicable
for only a proportion of patients and was inferred from the bed
charges (general pediatric ward) of three nearby not-for-profit
hospitals in the non-governmental organization (NGO) sector. The
costing was estimated to derive annualized costs and compared
between different subgroups of JIA.
Indirect healthcare costs included
transportation expenses for initial and follow-up visits for
patients and their caregivers, and accommodation costs of the
caregivers if from out-station. The productivity loss was
calculated from the number of days of work-absenteeism and the
loss of daily wages for daily wage earner caregivers or
deduction from salary for salaried caregivers as declared.
Statistical analyses: Numerical variables
were compared between biologic and no-biologic subgroups by
Student unpaired t test or Mann-Whitney U test,
depending upon whether normal distribution assumption was
satisfied or not. Normality assumption was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov
goodness-of-fit test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or
Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, as applicable, was applied for comparison
between the multiple JIA subgroups. Statistical significance was
inferred if P value was less than 0.05.
RESULTS
A total of seventy children were approached
which excluded three who didn’t consent, four with unreliable
records and three who were lost to follow-up, to finally include
60 (53.5% males) children in the study with mean (SD) age 8.46
(2.24) years. The mean (SD) of number of OPD visits were 12.5
(2.56) (range 7-20) and inpatient admissions ranged from 0-6.
The mean (SD) number of OPD visits in sJIA subgroup was 13.2 (2)
which was the maximum among all subgroups with most hospital
admissions [median (IQR) 3 (0-6). The proportions of the total
annualized cost incurred on OPD visits, blood tests, imaging
investigations, other tests, medication and hospitalization were
0.8%, 12.8%, 9%, 2.9%, 41.7% and 32.7%, respectively.
The direct and indirect costs in the whole
JIA cohort have been presented in Table I. The mean (SD)
medication costs and hospitalization costs were Rs. 9011.5
(4217.53) and Rs. 8489.3 (4789.88) in patients with sJIA, which
were highest than all other subgroups; P =0.001 and 0.090
respectively. The mean (SD) medication cost was lowest at Rs.
3225.1 (1046.96) in the oligoarticular subgroup as compared to
sJIA subgroup; P <0.001. Children with oligoarticular did
not require hospitalization. The medication and hospitalization
costs were comparable between polyarticular, enthesitis related
and undifferentiated types; P >0.05 (data not shown).
Table I Healthcare Related Costs (INR) for Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (N=60)
Category |
Cost |
Direct costs |
|
OPD visits |
120 (110-140) |
Blood tests |
1555 (1350-2340.5) |
Imaging |
772.5 (460-1453) |
Other tests |
312.5 (145-630) |
Medicinesa |
6185.2 (2984.34) |
Hospitalization |
3168 (1522-5216) |
Indirect costs |
|
Transport |
2155.5 (1275-3000) |
Accommodation |
0 (0-1705) |
Income loss |
5195 (2890-7229) |
Cost in median (IQR) or amean (SD); OPD-Outpatient
department. |
The median (IQR) transportation cost was
highest for patients with sJIA and lowest in oligoarticular JIA
[Rs. 2737 (2230-6040) and 1280 (1120-2000); P = 0.05].
The median (IQR) accommodation cost was Rs. 1585 (0-2876) in
sJIA which was the highest among all subgroups; P=0.001.
Self-declared income loss was comparable between subgroups.
Table II compares the costs in JIA patients who received
treatment with biologics (n=9) and those who did not.
Table II Healthcare Costs (INR) for Children With JIA According to Usage of Biologic Agents
Cost (INR) |
Treatment with |
Treated without |
|
biologics (n=9) |
biologics (n=51) |
OPD visits |
120 (120-120) |
120 (110-140) |
Blood tests |
1350 (1247-1845) |
1624 (1365-2465) |
Imaging |
550 (260-780) |
825 (460-1467) |
Medicinesa,b |
11737.14 (4518.74) |
5844.47 (2107.93) |
Hospitalizationb |
11956 (11210-12040) |
2390 (1325-3268) |
Transportb |
2970 (2230-5132) |
1722 (1270-2970) |
Accommodationb |
2400 (1600-3428) |
0 (0-1257) |
Data shown as median (IQR) and amean (SD);bP value
<0.05. |
DISCUSSION
The provisional cost analysis of JIA in a
public-sector hospital revealed considerable economic burden,
majorly for the cost of medicines. The burden was highest in
patients with sJIA and was higher with uses of biologics.
The type of JIA and active joint count are
predictors of direct costs, with higher costs for patients with
polyarthritis (rheumatoid factor positive or negative) or sJIA
[4]. The cost increases with disease activity, disease duration,
and time period from symptom onset to first pediatric
rheumatologist visit [5].
The major share of the total direct
healthcare cost burden was accounted for by medicines in the
present study, similar to other studies [4-6]. The investigation
costs tend to be relatively higher in the developed countries.
With the increasing availability and use of biologics for more
severe disease, medication costs can be expected to further
increase.
A study [7], from New England reported that
out-patient cost in JIA was 3.3 times higher than the inpatient
costs. The mean in-patient cost comprising hospitali-zation and
medicine cost was higher than the outpatient cost in the present
study when all the cases were pooled together. The direct
healthcare costs accounted for 46% of total costs, direct
non-healthcare costs for 26.4% and productivity losses for 27.6%
in another study in the United Kingdom [6]. A German study [5]
also indicated considerable proportion of indirect cost due to
time lost from work.
In India, studies on economic burden of
childhood diseases are scarce. The growth velocity is
significantly reduced in seropositive JIA subjects [8];
treatment for which is costly. A recent systematic review [10],
also concluded considerable economic impact of JIA with data
largely reflecting European and North American costs.
The present study was conducted in a
government hospital where the salary of professional personnel
and other logistical costs were not accounted for. The estimated
costs would be invariably less than the costing in private
set-ups. The expenditure on evaluation and management before
coming to the index hospital were not accounted. The sample size
was limited and children only up to twelve years were included
which may also affect generalizability of the study findings.
More studies on the economic impact of
juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the Indian scenario are needed
from different regions and health-settings before a plea for
social support to these children can be made to the public
health authorities.
Contributors: MK: primary investigator,
data collection, draft preparation; DD: patient management,
literature search; AH: literature search, draft review,
statistical analysis; PG: study design, patient management,
draft review and interpretation; MBS: technical inputs, data
collection and interpretation; RM: conception of study, draft
review, study design and literature search. All authors approved
the final manuscript.
Ethical clearance: Institutional Ethics
committee of Medical College Kolkata; No. 368/11-2016 dated
November 19, 2016.
Funding: None; Competing interest:
None stated.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?
• A provisional costs analysis of
juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a public-sector
teaching hospital revealed considerable economic burden,
which was higher in systemic onset JIA and with the use
of biologics.
|
REFERENCES
1. Shenoi S, Horneff G, Cidon M, et al. The
burden of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis for patients
and caregivers: An international survey and retrospective chart
review. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36:920-28.
2. Moorthy LN, Peterson MG, Hassett AL,
Lehman TJ. Burden of childhood-onset arthritis. Pediatr
Rheumatol Online J. 2010;8:20.
3. Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J,
Biedermann T, Schontube M, Zink A. Burden and cost of illness in
patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis.
2004;63:836-42.
4. Bernatsky S, Duffy C, Malleson P, Feldman
DE, St Pierre Y, Clarke AE. Economic impact of juvenile
idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:44-8.
5. Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J, et al.
The economic burden of juvenileidiopathic arthritis-Results from
the German paediatric rheumatologic database. Clin Exp Rheumatol.
2009;27:863-9.
6. Angelis A, Kanavos P, Lopez-Bastida J,
Linertova R, Serrano-Aguilar P for BURQOL-RD Research Network.
Socioeconomic costs and health-related quality of life in
juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A cost-of-illness study in the
United Kingdom. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17: 321.
7. Allaire SH, DeNardo BS, Szer IS, Meenan
RF, Schaller JG. The economic impacts of juvenile rheumatoid
arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:952-5.
8. Mondal R, Sarkar S, Das NK, et al. Growth
of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Indian Pediatr.
2014;51:199-202.
9. Hogan ME, Shah V, Katz J, Krahn MD, Taddio
A. Cost-of-illness studies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A
systematic review. Value Health. 2014;17:A45.
|
|
 |
|