|
Indian Pediatr 2021;58:34-37 |
 |
Karyotype-Phenotype
Correlation in Turner Syndrome at a Single Center in Eastern
India
|
Sunetra Mondal, Rana Bhattacharjee, Subhankar Chowdhury and Satinath
Mukhopadhyay
From Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Institute of Post
Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata,
West Bengal, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Satinath Mukhopadhyay, Department of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, IPGME&R and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West
Bengal 700 020, India.
Email:
[email protected]
Received: November 25, 2019;
Initial review: January 27, 2020;
Accepted: September 28, 2020.
|
Objective: To describe clinical features in
Indian girls with Turner syndrome along with the phenotype-karyotype
correlation. Methods: 103 girls with Turner syndrome were divided
into karyotype-groups: Classic (45X), 45,X/46,XX mosaics,
isochromosomeXq (46,X,iXq and 45,X/46,X,iXq mosaics), 45,X/46,XYmosaics
and structural defects, and analyzed for phenotypic differences.
Results: Majority (44.1%) had classic karyotype followed by
isochromosome-Xq (26.5%). Classic Turner syndrome had higher prevalence
of most skeletal and cutaneous stigmata, cubitus valgus (68.3%) and
multiple nevi (68.2%) being the commonest. Bicuspid aortic valve was
most common in 45,X/46,XX mosaics (5/15, 33.3%), and aortic coarctation
in classic TS (3/42, 7.2%). Congenital renal anomalies occurred mostly
in classic TS (6/42,14.3%). Overt hypothyroidism, conductive deafness
and recurrent otitis media were commonest in isochromosomes (P<0.03).
45,X/46,XY mosaics had highest IQ (P<0.005). Conclusion:
We report some novel associations of karyotype with non-endocrine
parameters in Turner syndrome. In resource-limited settings, underlying
karyotype may help prioritize screening investigations in girls with
Turner syndrome.
Keywords: Congenital anomalies, Karyotype, Skeletal stigmata,
Turner syndrome.
|
T urner syndrome is
characterized by short stature and multiple skeletal
deformities, gonadal failure, congenital anomalies of
cardiovascular and urinary system, neuro-cognitive
abnormalities, autoimmune diseases, metabolic abnormalities and
osteoporosis [1]. There is variability in the clinical
manifestations of Turner syndrome depending on the karyotype and
other factors like parental origin of the X chromosome and
epigenetic modification [2]. The extra-endocrine manifestations
in Turner syndrome like the cardiac or renal deformities and
autoimmune disorders are important to detect early for timely
intervention and improving longevity. Results of studies trying
to correlate genotype with phenotype in Turner syndrome have
often been inconsistent although there are some established
associations like increased auto-immune disorders in
isochromosomes, mental retardation in ring chromosomes and an
overall milder presentation in 45,X/46,XX mosaics compared to
classic Turner syndrome (45,X) [3-5].
There are few studies on Turner syndrome from
India [6,7]. The current study reports the skeletal stigmata and
different congenital anomalies, otologic and neuro-cognitive
aspects of Turner syndrome in India and analyzes inter-karyotype
phenotypic differences.
METHODS
Karyotype analysis was performed according to
the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomen-clature
(ISCN, 2005) guidelines [8] on 20-30 metaphase cells. Ethical
clearance for this study was obtained from the institutional
ethics committee of IPGME&R, Kolkata. Skeletal stigmata were
assessed as per standard definitions [9]. Echocardiography with
color doppler assessment was used to detect congenital cardiac
malformations and assessment of aortic root diameter. For girls
older them 15 years, Weschler adult intelligence Score (WAIS IV)
was used whereas for those aged between 5-15 years, the Malin
intelligence scale for Indian children (MISIC), a validated
Indian adaptation of Weschler intelligence scale for children
(WISC), was used for intelligence testing [10].
The patients were grouped into categories
depending on their karyotype including classic-Turner syndrome
(45,X), 45,X/46,XX mosaics, 45,X/46,XY mosaics, isochromosome-Xq
(46,X,iXq or 45,X/46,X,iXq), structural defects of X (del-Xq or
ring chromosomes ) and complex karyotypes. The results obtained
for the parameters were analyzed for differences between classic
and non-classic Turner syndrome and among the first four
karyotypes.
Statistical analyses: Statistical
analyses were done using GraphPad Prism v.6e. Differences
between karyotypes were assessed using unpaired t-test, ANOVA,
or Chi-square test as applicable. P value <0.05 was
considered as significant.
RESULTS
Of 103 patients with Turner syndrome,
majority (44.1 %) were classic Turner syndrome followed by those
with isochromosome-Xq (26.2%) and 45,X/46,XX-mosaics (17.6%).
The mean (SD) age of presentation was 14.8 (3.97) years, upto
98% of the patients presenting due to gonadal failure (74%) or
short stature (24%). Only 2% of the girls presented due to
associated comorbidities or complications, chiefly cardiac. The
youngest age of diagnosis was 6 years; diagnosed during
evaluation for coarctation of aorta.
Cubitus valgus (68.3%) and multiple nevi
(68.2%) were the most prevalent stigmata. Classis TS had a
significantly higher prevalence of short fourth
meta-carpals/metatarsals, high arched palate, edema of
hands/feet, low posterior hairline, low set ears and shield
chest. We also noted some atypical stigmata like absent terminal
phalanges of digits and terminal transverse defect of lower
limb.
Congenital cardiac malformations were found
in 21.5% patients, most common malformation being bicuspid
aortic valve (n=6) followed by septal defects (ASD/VSD) (n=6)
and coarctation of aorta (CoA) (n=4). Others included
root dilatations with regurgitation of aortic and tricuspid
valve and mitral valve prolapse. Four patients had multiple
cardiac malformations. 45,X/46,XX mosaics had higher prevalence
of BAV (5, 33.3%), (P=0.004 vs classic Turner Syndrome).
Most cases of aortic coarctation occurred in those with classic
Turner syndrome (75%) (Table I). Classic Turner syndrome
had the highest aortic root diameter (27.55 mm +/- 4.03). ECG
abnormalities were seen in 11.2% - mostly
left-ventricular-hypertrophy (LVH) or Right-axis-deviation (RAD)
secondary to coarctation of aorta or septal defects, or
non-specific ST-T wave changes. Hypertension was seen in seven
patients, out of which three had coarctation of aorta. Neither
hypertension nor ECG changes had any karyotype preponderance.
Table I Prevalence of Phenotypic Abnormalities in Different Karyotype of Turner Syndrome (N=103)
Karyotype group (n) |
Classic TS |
Non-classic |
XO/XX mosaics |
Iso-chromosome |
XO/XY mosaics |
|
(n=43) |
TS (n=55) |
(n =18) |
Xq (n=25) |
(n=6) |
Cardiac malformations, n (%) |
23.8 |
20 |
46.7a |
4.1 |
16.7 |
Aortic root diameter (mm) |
23.8 (2.4)a |
23.5 (2.5) |
24.8 (3.1) |
22.5 (1.8) |
23.8 ( 2.4)a |
Congenital anomalies of kidney
|
19 |
6.1 |
6.7 |
0 |
0 |
and urinary tract, n (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Conductive hearing loss |
10.8 |
31.6a |
23 |
47.3b |
0 |
Verbal IQ |
88.2 (10.4) |
87.7 (19) |
71.1 (17)c |
91.8 (13.8) |
107.3 (11.6)a |
Performance IQ |
75.6 (8.4) |
75.2 (14.9) |
62.3 (12.2)c |
78.9 (12.9) |
89 (2.2)a |
Arithmetic scores |
79.9 (10.3) |
77.9 (17.7) |
62.9 (17.1)c |
81.4 (12.5) |
96.8 (8.1)a |
All values in mean
(SD) or as stated; TS: Turner syndrome; IQ: Intelligence
quotient; asignificant difference from classic TS
(P<0.004); bsignificantly higher than classic TS
(P=0.02); csignificantly lower than classic TS
(P<0.005). |
Classic Turner syndrome had a slight majority
of congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) (19
% vs 6.1 % vs non-classic TS, P=ns). Renal anomalies were
mostly seen in classic TS (14.3% vs 2.4%, P=0.04).
Horseshoe kidneys (9.5%) were commonest, followed by unilateral
fused kidneys (4.8%). Duplicated pelvicalyceal system, PUJ
abnormalities occurred equally in classic and non-classic
karyotypes.
Upon pure tone audiometry testing, 11% had
conductive hearing loss (HL) whereas sensorineural hearing loss
(SNHL) was seen in 18.2% and mixed HL in 7.3%. Upto 18.4% had
recurrent otitis media. There was a significantly higher
prevalence of recurrent otitis media and conductive deafness in
isochromosomes (both 47.3%, Pboth<0.03).
Classic TS had slightly higher prevalence of sensorineural
hearing loss (SNHL) (27.3%, P> 0.05).
Celiac screening with serum
tissue-transglutaminase IgA-antibody were negative in fifty
asymptomatic patients tested (with normal total IgA levels). One
patient with malabsorptive symptoms revealed villous atrophy and
lymphocytic infiltrates on duodenal biopsy.
Thyroid antibodies (anti- TPO Ab and/or
anti-Tg Ab) were found in 52.9% of the girls, 28.2% had overt
hypothyroidism and 23.5% had subclinical hypothy-roidism. One
patient with classic TS had Graves’ disease. There were no
significant differences in anti-thyroid antibody positivity or
prevalence of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) [TPO/Tg positive
and not euthyroid] among the karyotypes. Overt hypothyroidism
was signi-ficantly higher for isochromosomes (52%, P=0.002)
whereas subclinical hypothyroidism and euthyroidism with
TPO/Tg-Ab positivity were both slightly higher in XO/XY mosaics
(50% and 16.7%,Pboth=ns).
Out of fifty patients studied, 42% had normal
VIQ, only one patient had normal PIQ. 58% had a discordance
between VIQ and PIQ (VIQ–PIQ>10). 45,X/46,XY mosaics had the
highest and 45,X/46,XX mosaics the lowest Verbal and Performance
IQ as well as arithmetic scores (Pboth<0.005).
We had a single case of ring chromosome in our cohort who had
extremely low PIQ as well as extremely low VIQ. Of those with
extremely low PIQ (PIQ<70), 28.6% were classic TS while 50% were
45,X/46,XX mosaic TS.
DISCUSSION
Though several studies have reported an
increased severity of stigmata in classic TS, the differences of
Turner’s stigmata in different karyotypes have less clinical
relevance. We had similar findings and in addition, we found
some atypical skeletal stigmata like absent terminal phalanges
of digits and terminal transverse defect of lower limb which
might have a biologically plausible explanation related to
compression of the developing limb bud by in-utero lymphedema or
SHOX haploin-sufficiency.
CoA was seen almost exclusively in classic TS
which is also reported in the Turkish registry [11] and cardiac
malformations were overall more in classic TS in a study from
Saudi Arabia [5]. There are predominantly two mechanisms leading
to CCMs in TS. The first is jugular lymphatic-sac obstruction
causing distension of the thoracic-duct which compresses the
ascending aorta leading to coarctation. The other mechanism is
haplo-insufficiency of X chromosomal genes like CASK and
USP9X which are important in regulating TGF- b-SMAD
signalling pathway [12,13]. This leads to altered migration of
neural crest cells into vascular smooth muscle and altered
regulation of matrix proteins causing defective valve formation
and root dilatation. It might be that the former mechanism is
more important for coarctation, which is therefore more
prevalent in classic TS who are more prone to in-utero
lymphedema formation. The second mechanism probably explains the
valvular/septal abnormalities. We also found a significantly
higher aortic root diameter in classic TS. Developmental defects
of the kidney but not collecting duct anomalies were higher in
classic TS. Whether factors like obstruction of the tract of
ascent of kidneys by distended lymphatic sac has any role to
play in this is unknown.
The higher prevalence of conductive hearing
loss in isochromosomes and classic Turner syndrome is explained
by the fact that both these groups have a haploinsufficiency of
Xp specific genes like SHOX which is expressed in the
first two branchial arches. This leads to altered eustachian
tube mechanics and abnormal shape of the palate which predispose
to fluid accumulation in the ear leading to secondary infections
and conductive hearing loss.
Though the prevalence of anti-thyroid
antibodies was similar in all groups, an increased severity of
auto-immune responses of the thyroid could explain an earlier
onset and hence higher prevalence of overt hypothy-roidism in
isochromosomes. Interestingly, in a UK-based TS registry
including adult TS only, isochromosomes had a lower prevalence
of hypo-thyroidism whereas in an Iranian study, hypothyroidism
was high among 45,X/46,XX and mosaic isochromosomes [3,14].
Almost all the girls tested had low PIQ.
45,X/46,XY mosaics had the highest and 45,X/46,XX mosaics the
lowest VIQ, PIQ and arithmetic scores. Ours is the only Indian
study on IQ in TS girls.There have not been many systematic
studies on separate VIQ and PIQ assessment across different
karyotypic variants in TS and age-appro-priate battery of tests
were not used. Individuals with TS are known to have an
increased risk of selective impair-ment of non-verbal skills and
performance IQ. A review by Ross, et al. [15] suggests that
apart from hypo-estrogenism, haploinsufficiency of genes on the
short arm of the X chromosome (Xp) could be responsible for the
hallmark features of the TS cognitive phenotype.
A limitation of our study was that cardiac
MRI was not done to measure aortic size index. For celiac
disease, we analyzed only anti-Ttg IgA and total IgA and did not
detect any positive case. The possibility exists that duodenal
biopsies would have yielded more cases.
In developing nations like India, frequent
monitoring for all comorbidities in Turner syndrome is
difficult. Echo-cardiographic screening for congenital cardiac
malfor-mations should be done for all, but cardiac MRI with
aortic size index estimation is a must for classic Turner
syndrome patients, who have the highest prevalence of aortic
coarctation and the largest aortic root diameter. IQ (verbal and
performance) testing is most important for 45,X/46,XX mosaics.
Similarly, frequent pure tone audiometry is most essential in
the classic and isochromo-some Xq group. While annual thyroid
function testing is recommended for all karyotypes of Turner
syndrome, more frequent monitoring for overt hypothy-roidism may
be necessary for Turner syndrome with isochromosome-Xq. We do
not intend to under-emphasize the importance of following
existing guidelines for screening [20], but we suggest that our
findings may help prioritize the most essential investigations
in different karyotype groups.
Acknowledgements: Dr Dinesh Munian,
Assistant Professor, IPGME&R, Kolkata and Dr Ajanta Halder,
Professor, Department of Genetics, Vivekananda Institute of
Medical Sciences, Kolkata for their opinion on karyotypes of the
patients. Dr Pradip Mukhopadhyay for his support with the
statistical analysis.
Ethics clearance: Institutional
ethics committee of IPGME&R, Kolkata; No. IPGME&R/IEC/2017/098,
dated February 16, 2017.
Contributors: SM: acquisition of data,
analysis of raw data with interpretation and formulating the
initial draft; RB: contributed to data collection, analysis and
revising the draft; SC: contributed to the concept and design of
the project and critical analysis of the data and draft; SM: was
chiefly involved in data analysis, revising the data and draft
critically for important intellectual content. All authors
approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest:
None stated.
|
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS?
• This study provides data on
clinical features of Turner syndrome from a large cohort
of Indian patients.
• Karyotype may help prioritize some screening
investigations in resource-constrained settings.
|
REFERENCES
1. Bondy CA, Turner Syndrome Consensus Study
Group. Care of Girls and Women With Turner Syndrome: A Guideline
of the Turner Syndrome Study Group. J Clin Endocrinol Met.
2007;92:10-25.
2. Gravholt CH, Andersen NH, Conway GS, et
al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care of Girls and Women
With Turner Syndrome: Proceedings From the 2016 Cincinnati
International Turner Syndrome Meeting. European J Endocrinol.
2017;177:G1-70
3. Cameron-Pimblett A, La Rosa C, King TF,
Davies MC, Conway GS. The Turner syndrome life course project:
Karyotype-phenotype analyses across the lifespan. Clinical
endocrinology. 2017;87:532-8.
4. Zelinska N, Shevchenko I, Globa E.
Nationwide study of Turner syndrome in Ukrainian children:
prevalence, genetic variants and phenotypic features. J Clin Res
Pediatr Endocrinol. 2018;10:256.
5. Al Alwan I, Khadora M, Amir I, et al.
Turner syndrome genotype and phenotype and their effect on
presenting features and timing of diagnosis. Int J Health Sci.
2014;8:19.
6. Maiti A, Chatterjee S. Turner syndrome:
Fifteen years’ experience in India. J Obs Gynec India.
2014;64:121-3.
7. Suri M, Kabra M, Jain U, et al. A clinical
and cytogenetic study of Turner syndrome. Indian Pediatr.
1995;32:433-9.
8. Shaffer LG, Tommerup N, editors. ISCN
2005: An International System for Human Cytogenetic
Nomen-clature (2005): Recommendations of the International
Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Karger
Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2005.
9. Kosho T, Muroya K, Nagai T, et al.
Skeletal features and growth patterns in 14 patients with
haploinsufficiency of SHOX: Implications for the development of
Turner syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:4613-21.
10. Malin AJ. Manual for Malin’s intelligence
scale for Indian children (MISIC) 1969. Indian Psychological
Corporation.
11. Yeºilkaya E, Bereket A, Darendeliler
F, et al. Turner syndrome and associated problems in Turkish
children: A multicenter study. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol.
2015; 7:27.
12. Miyabara S, Sugihara H, Maehara N, et al.
Significance of cardiovascular malformations in cystic hygroma:
A new interpretation of the pathogenesis. Am J Med Genet. 1989;
34:489-501.
13. Mortensen KH, Andersen NH, Gravholt CH.
Cardio-vascular phenotype in Turner syndrome - Integrating
cardiology, genetics, and endocrinology. Endocr Rev.
2012;33:677-714.
14. Nazarabadi HM, Seyyedi S, Aboutorabi R.
Effects of karyotype variations on phenotype of patients with
Turner syndrome. Iranian J Med Sci. 2005;30:182-5.
15. Ross J, Zinn A, McCauley E. Neurodevelopmental and
psychosocial aspects of Turner syndrome. Mental Retard Dev Disab
Res Rev. 2000;6:135-41.
|
|
 |
|