|
Indian Pediatr 2018;55:45-47 |
 |
Long-term Protection
Against the Hepatitis B Virus Detected Through an Early Response
to a Booster Dose Injection
|
Hiva Saffar 1,
Ali-Reza Khalilian2,
Mohammed-Jafar Saffar3
and Abolghasem Ajami4
From the Department of 1Pathology,
Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran; and
Departments of 2Biostatistics, 3Pediatric
Infectious Diseases Ward and Antimicrobial Resistance Nosocomial
Infection Research Center, and 4Immunology and Molecular and
Cellular Biology Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical
Sciences, Sari; Iran.
Correspondence to: Dr Mohammed-Jafar Saffar,
Pediatric Infectious Diseases Ward and Antimicrobial Resistance
Nosocomial Infection Research Center, Mazandaran University of Medical
Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Email: [email protected]
Received: January 12, 2016;
Initial review: March 26, 2016;
Accepted: September 13, 2017.
|
Objective: To determine the duration of
protection conferred by the hepatitis B (HB) vaccination and the
necessity of a booster dose. Methods: Immediately after the
initial blood sampling, 252 youths (aged 18.8-20.5 years, 52% females)
with a history of neonatal HB vaccination with one dose of the HB
vaccine received a booster. Serum concentrations of antibodies against
the HB surface antigen were assessed in samples collected before and
10-14 days after the booster. Seroconversion from concentrations <10 to
³10
IU/L were defined as a positive immune response. Results: Of the
252 participants, 131 were sero-susceptible and 114 responded.
Conclusions: Nearly 90% of young people preserved their long-term
protection; the results of this study do not support the use of an HB
booster vaccination.
Keywords: Booster vaccination, HBV vaccine, Immune memory,
Long-term protection.
|
H epatitis B immunization
beginning in infancy is reported to protect at least 20 years even
without a booster dose [1-4], but few other studies have suggested that
vaccinations given to infants might not be sufficient to offer
long-lasting protection [5-7]. Therefore, it is reasonable to determine
whether vaccinated infants maintain their protection against HB until
they reach an age where their risk of HB infection increases due to
their lifestyles and professional exposure or if they need a booster
vaccination to sustain their immunity into adulthood. Protection against
HB infection is mediated through the specific antibodies against HB
surface antigen (anti-HBs) [8]; therefore, an indirect method to
investigate the presence of immune protection and memory is to look for
an anamnestic response following the administration of a booster dose to
the vaccines that had lost their acquired humoral immunity (antibodies)
over time. A rapid and prominent increase in anti-HBs concentrations a
short time after boosting indicates the presence of specific immune
memory and likely protection against HB infection [9-11]. In Iran,
universal neonatal HB immunization was incorporated in the National
Program of Immunization since March 1993, scheduled at birth, 1.5 months
and 9 months of age. This study was designed to evaluate the HB
infection seromarkers among young adults, and also to investigate their
immune response to a booster dose injection.
Methods
Study participants were volunteers selected from a
previous sero-epidemiological study in young adults who had been
vaccinated 20 years earlier [12]. In that study, 510 youths with a
documented history of complete HB vaccination starting at birth "as the
first cohort of Iranian neonates involved in the national program" were
the participants. In the present study, we randomly selected 252 people
out of 510 cases of the former study. The study was approved by the
Ethics Committees of the Mazandaran and Tehran Universities of Medical
Sciences. Written informed consent was obtained prior to the study.
Immediately after the first blood sampling, all
participants received a dose of the HB vaccine. Ten to 14 days later,
second blood samples were obtained from each participant. Pre- and
post-booster sera were analyzed for their concentrations of the HB
surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies against the HBsAg (anti-HBs) and
the HB core antigen (anti-HBc), using a quantitative enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay method with commercial kits. Concentrations were
expressed as lU/L, and titers >370 IU/L were not further discriminated.
The participants were divided into four groups based upon their anti-HBs
levels in the pre-booster sera as follows: G1: undetectable titer (<2
IU/L); G2: non-protected titer (2-9.9 IU/L); G3: low protection, (10-99
IU/L); and G4: highly protected, titers ( ³100
IU/L). Anti-HBs concentrations (³10
IU/L) were considered protective, and concentrations (³300IU/L)
without a positive anti-HBc were arbitrarily defined as natural
boosting. Participants with positive anti-HBc antibodies with/without
positive anti-HBs were considered to have a subclinical breakthrough
infection. A positive immune response was defined as seroconversion from
titers <10 to ³10
IU/L, while an anamnestic response included the acquisition of an
anti-HBs concentration ³100
IU/L in those subjects with titers <10 IU/L or a
³4-fold increase in
titers in participants with anti-HBs levels 10-99 IU/L before boosting.
The mean concentration of antibodies (MCA) and the proportion of
responders to boosting in each group were also calculated. Chi-square
and independent t-tests were used to compare the proportion of
responders and the MCA produced after boosting in the different groups.
A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
TABLE I Pattern of Immune Response to a Booster Dose 20 Years after Primary Hepatitis B Immunization
Anti-HBs antibody concentration
(IU/L) |
|
No. of subjects |
MCA* (SD) IU/L |
Number |
|
|
Pre-booster |
Post-booster |
of responders
(%) |
G1: concentration <2 |
88 |
0.6 (0.44) |
193.6 (157.8) |
74 (84.2) |
G2: concentration 2-9.9 |
43 |
4.9 (2.05) |
309.7 (119.2) |
40 (93.1) |
G3: concentration 10-99 |
41 |
35.6 (25.1) |
342.58 (96.6) |
39 (95.1) |
G4: concentration
≥100 |
71 |
326.67 (82.60) |
355.06 (33.07) |
Not applicable |
*MCA: Mean concentration of
antibodies; P value: G1 vs. G2: 0.07 for the proportion of
responders and <0.001 for MCA. |
Results
A total of 252 young adults with an age range from
18.8–20.5 years (52% females) were enrolled in this study. After
excluding 9 participants with anti-HBc positivity, the relative
proportion of allocated subjects in each group was as follows: G1, 88;
G2, 43; G3, 41; and G4, 71 individuals. In the G4 participants, 41
(16.2%) showed antibody concentrations >300 IU/L. Ten to 14 days after
the booster injection, 114 of 131 (87%) of the non-protected individuals
mounted a positive immune response and were seroconverted. Participants
whose pre-booster anti-HBs levels were from 2-9.9 IU/L had a higher
probability of showing a response to boosting in comparison to
participants levels <2 IU/L. Of the 41 participants in the G3 group, 39
(95.1%) showed an anamnestic response, and their post-booster MCA levels
increased significantly (P=0.001). None of the G4 group responded
to the booster. Finally, 90% of the participants retained their vaccine
protection for 20 years.
Discussion
To better determine the kinetics of vaccine-induced
anti-HBs antibody titer and the prevalence of boostability among
vaccinated subjects over time, a comparison was made between this
study’s findings (a preservation rate of >44% seroprotection and an 87%
response rate to boosting) and the results of our earlier study, which
was performed 10 years ago in another region of the province [13] in the
same cohort of Iranian infants vaccinated with the same vaccine and
schedule. The results indicated that the prevalence of seroprotection
rates decreased significantly but the boostability of the vaccinees did
not change significantly. In this study, there was a direct correlation
between pre-booster anti-HBs titers and the magnitude of the immune
response to the booster injection; a lower response was seen in those
with undetectable titers. Similar findings were earlier reported [14].
These findings may suggest that higher numbers of memory cells may be
impaired or even disappeared in these vaccinated subjects.
The results of several long-term follow-up studies
which investigated the persistence of specific antibodies and the
presence of immune memory in persons vaccinated with different schedules
and vaccines living in different settings of HB infection have been
published [1-7]. While most studies have reported that nearly half of
the vaccinees preserved their seroprotection 15-23 years after
vaccination and the majority successfully responded to a booster
vaccination (even those without detectable antibody titers) [1-4], some
other studies have shown a very short duration of antibody persistence
and poor immune memory [5-7]. Studies conducted in low-risk settings
with comparable follow-up periods have generally shown lower rates of
seroprotection and anamnestic responses than those in high-endemic
countries. In a 15-year prospective study by Hammitt, et al. [5]
only 5% of the vaccinated subjects preserved their seroprotection and an
anamnestic response was observed in 51% of the boosted participants.
These rates were 24% and 92%, respectively, in a study conducted in
children in the United States by Middleman, et al. [4].
In contrast to most long-term prospective studies, in
our cross-sectional study, the primary immune response and the initial
anti-HBs antibody concentration achieved after priming were not studied.
Therefore, our estimation for the natural boosting prevalence contained
an arbitrary cut-off that may result in the under- or over-estimation of
the natural boosting rate.
In conclusion, our study results indicate that infant
HB vaccination provides long-term protection up through 20 years of age
in the majority of vaccinated infants. These findings are in accordance
with the current recommendation by most experts that a universal routine
booster vaccination in the general population is not required for up to
20 years. However, the screening of vaccinated young adults at increased
risk of exposure to HB infection to evaluate their immunity status and
possible requirement for booster vaccination may still be required
[9-11,15].
Acknowledgement: K. Shams-Esfandabad, J. Shojaei,
and the health staff in the health centers affiliated with the Deputy of
Health (Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences) for assistance in
data collection and blood sampling; and M. Sotudeh-Anvari for her help
with the laboratory testing and data collection.
Contributors: HS and MJS: conceptualization,
design, data collection, and writing the paper; AA: design and
laboratory testing; A-RK: statistical analysis.
Funding: Mazandaran and Tehran Universities of
Medical Sciences; Competing interest: None stated.
What this Study Adds?
• Primary vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine conferred
adequate protection against disease at least for 20 years, and
booster dose is not required even in the low endemicity area.
|
References
1. Poovorawan Y, Chongsrisawat V, Theamboonlers A,
Leroux-Roels G, Kuriyakose S, Leyssen M, et al. Evidence of
protection against clinical and chronic hepatitis B infection 20 years
after infant vaccination in a high endemicity region. J Viral Hepat.
2011;18:369-75.
2. McMahon BJ, Dentinger CM, Bruden D, Zanis C,
Peters H, Hurlburt D, et al. Antibody levels and protection after
hepatitis B vaccine: Results of a 22-year follow-up study and response
to a booster dose. J Infect Dis. 2009;200:1390-6.
3. Wu Q, Zhuang GH, Wang XL, Wang LR, Li N, Zhang M.
Antibody levels and immune memory 23 years after primary plasma-derived
hepatitis B vaccination: results of a randomized placebo-controlled
trial cohort from China where endemicity is high. Vaccine.
2011;29:2302-7.
4. Middleman AB, Baker CJ, Kozinetz CA, Kamili S,
Nguyen C, Hu DJ, et al. Duration of protection after infant
hepatitis B vaccination series. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e1500-7.
5. Hammitt LL, Hennessy TW, Fiore AE, Zanis C, Hummel
KB, Dunaway E, et al. Hepatitis B immunity in children vaccinated
with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine beginning at birth: A follow-up
study at 15 years. Vaccine. 2007;25:6958-64.
6. Chan PK, Ngai KL, Lao TT, Wong MC, Cheung T, Yeung
AC, et al. Response to booster doses of hepatitis B vaccine among
young adults who had received neonatal vaccination. PLoS One.
2014;9:e107163.
7. Jan CF, Huang KC, Chien YC, Greydanus DE, Davies
HD, Chiu TY, et al. Determination of immune memory to hepatitis B
vaccination through early booster response in college students.
Hepatology. 2010;51:1547-54.
8. Pichichero ME. Booster vaccinations: Can
immunologic memory outpace disease pathogenesis? Pediatrics.
2009;124:1633-41.
9. Leuridan E, Van Damme P. Hepatitis B and the need
for a booster dose. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:68-75.
10. FitzSimons D, Hendrickx G, Vorsters A, Van Damme
P. Hepatitis B vaccination: A completed schedule enough to control HBV
lifelong? Vaccine. 2013;31:584-90.
11. World Health Organization.Hepatitis B Vaccine.WHO
position paper.Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;48:405-20.
12. Saffar H, Ajami A, Saffar MJ, Shojaei J,
Sotudeh-Anvari M, Shams-Esfandabad K, et al. Prevalence of
hepatitis B virus seromarkers in young adults vaccinated at birth:
Impact on the epidemiology of hepatitis B infection in iran. Hepat Mon.
2014;14:e17263.
13. Saffar MJ1, Rezai MS. Long-term antibody response
and immunologic memory in children immunized with hepatitis B vaccine at
birth. Indian Pediatr. 2004;41:1232-7.
14. Spradling PR, Xing J, Williams R,
Masunu-Faleafaga Y, Dulski T, Mahamud A, et al. Immunity to
hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection two decades after implementation of
universal infant HBV vaccination: Association of detectable residual
antibodies and response to a single HBV challenge dose. Clin Vaccine
Immunol. 2013;20:559-61.
15. Poorolajal J, Mahmoodi M, Majdzadeh R, Nasseri-Moghaddam S,
Haghdoost A, Fotouhi A. Long-term protection provided by hepatitis B
vaccine and need for booster dose: A meta-analysis. Vaccine.
2010;28:623-31.
|
|
 |
|