 |
|
Gaurav Gupta
Email:
[email protected] |
 |
Closing schools during H1N1 epidemic may
worsen the problem! (J Pub Health Management Practice: 23 December
2009 doi:10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181ce594e) |
Closing schools for less than two weeks during a flu pandemic may increase
infection rates and prolong an epidemic. The value of school closures has
been debated as a possible strategy to stem or slow the current H1N1
influenza pandemic. Indeed, hundreds of schools across the country have
been closed at different periods during 2009 for fear the virus would
spread more quickly if they stayed open. The study was based on an
agent-based computer simulation model that included more than 500,000
households and nearly 300 schools. Entire school system closures were not
more effective than individual school closures. Any type of school closure
may need to be maintained throughout most of the epidemic (ie, at least 8
weeks) to have any significant effect on the overall serologic attack
rate. In fact, relatively short school closures (ie, 2 weeks or less) may
actually slightly increase the overall attack rate by returning
susceptible students back into schools in the middle of the epidemic.
Varying the illness threshold at which school closures are triggered did
not seem to have substantial impact on the effectiveness of school
closures, suggesting that short delays in closing schools should not cause
concern. The authors conclude that school closures alone may not be able
to quell an epidemic but, when maintained for at least 8 weeks, could
delay the epidemic peak for up to a week, providing additional time to
implement vaccination.
Comment: What looks logical, may not always be the correct option!
|
 |
More long term maternal benefits with
breastfeeding (Obstet Gynecol 2010;115: 41) |
Mothers who do not breastfeed their infants appeared to be at increased
risk of vascular changes associated with future cardiovascular disease, in
a cross-sectional analysis of 297 women (45-58 y) free of clinical
cardiovascular disease who reported at least one live birth on enrollment.
After adjusting for measures of socioeconomic status and lifestyle and
family history variables, mothers who had not breastfed remained more
likely to have aortic calcification (odds ratio [OR] 3.85) and coronary
artery calcification (OR 2.78).
|
 |
Fluconazole prophylaxis in NICU (www.theannals.com,
29 December 2009) |
This meta-analysis on fluconazole prophylaxis in neonates included 4
randomized controlled trials and 8 cohort studies. No trial in this review
was able to demonstrate a significant difference in long-term morbidity or
mortality. Concerns also remain regarding the adverse effects associated
with prolonged exposure to fluconazole therapy. The authors conclude that
while it may be beneficial for critically ill neonates with certain
predisposing risk factors (eg, central venous access, sustained exposure
to broad-spectrum antibiotics, or units with significantly high incidence
of invasive fungal infections), existing research does not support the use
of fluconazole prophylaxis based on birth weight or gestational age alone.
|
 |
Low-dose aspirin (LDA) during pregnancy may alter brain development in
very preterm infants (Pediatrics
2009; 125; e29)
|
Data from this cohort study included 656 infants born to 584 women with an
obstetric history of placental
vascular disease, chronic hypertension, renal or autoimmune diseases,
before 33 weeks of gestation in 9 French regions in 1997. Low dose
aspirin, administered to 125 (21%) mothers did not affect the mortality,
cerebral lesions, cerebral palsy, or global cognitive impairment of the
children at 5 years of age. Therapy was not associated with adverse
neonatal or long-term outcomes. The results however suggest that low dose
aspirin therapy may be associated with a reduction in neurobehavioral
development.
|