|
Indian Pediatr 2010;47: 149-155 |
 |
Management of Chemotherapy-Induced
Nausea and Vomiting
|
Pooja Dewan, Swati Singhal* and Deepika Harit
From Department of Pediatrics, UCMS
and GTB Hospital, Delhi 110 095; and *Department of
Pediatrics,
Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi 110 001; India.
Correspondence to: Dr Pooja Dewan,
DII/65, Kaka Nagar, Dr Zakir Hussain Marg, New Delhi
110 003, India.
Email:
[email protected] |
Abstract
Context:
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is
a significant problem in the treatment of children
with cancer. The last decade has seen a variety of
newer antiemetics being evaluated for CINV; their
efficacy and side-effects need to be assessed in
children. This article attempts to highlight this
revised management of CINV.
Evidence acquisition:
Online search; journals. Search period: 6 months.
Results: Newer drugs (aprepitant,
fosapritant and newer 5HT3 antagonists) have been
found to be effective in CINV: both acute and
delayed phases. Most of the available literature
is, however, based on adult oncology patients,
with a few trials on adolescent patients.
Conclusion: Every child
receiving treatment for cancer should be evaluated
for possible CINV. Their treatment should take
into account the emetogenic potential of the
chemotherapeutic drugs. Newer antiemetic drugs
have good efficacy and can be tried in pediatric
patients, especially in children > 11 years of
age.
Keywords: Antiemetics, Cancer,
Chemotherapy, Nausea, Vomiting.
|
Chemotherapy is a
common modality for treatment of cancer. Regardless
of the fact that chemotherapy improves survival; it
has its own toxicity and side-effects, which have a
negative impact on the quality of life of children
with cancer. Severe side-effects, and non-compliance
because of those side-effects, can lead to loss of
time at school for the child, loss of time at work
for the caregiver, and additional office visits to
the doctor; all of which contribute both to death
and disability, and to the annual costs of cancer.
It is therefore imperative to optimize chemotherapy
and ensure minimum side-effects. Nausea and vomiting
continue to be significant side-effects of cancer
therapy and can affect patient compliance(1). To
avoid the clinical sequelae of chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting (CINV) like malnutrition,
dehydration, dyselectrolytemias, anorexia, stress,
esophageal tears, and anxiety, it is imperative to
provide prophylaxis and treatment for CINV.
Classification
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting (CINV) is broadly classified into acute,
delayed or anticipatory type depending upon the time
period of vomiting(2). Vomiting occurring in the
first 24 hours of administering chemotherapy is
labeled as acute CINV and in the absence of
effective prophylaxis, it most commonly begins
within one to two hours of chemotherapy and usually
peaks in the first four to six hours. Vomiting
occurring later is called delayed CINV. Classically,
this phenomenon was described with cisplatin. While
the frequency and number of episodes of emesis may
be less during the delayed period compared to acute
emesis, the delayed form is less well controlled
with current antiemetic medications. Anticipatory
emetic episodes are triggered by taste, odor,
sight, thoughts, or anxiety secondary to a history
of poor response to antiemetic agents or inadequate
antiemetic prophylaxis in the previous cycle of
chemotherapy. It usually starts 1 to 4 hours before
chemotherapy but can sometimes occur days before
chemotherapy(3,4).
Predisposing Factors
Risk factors for CINV include
patient gender (females >males), age (>3 years),
past history of CINV, the emetogenic potential of
the drug, and administration schedule of
chemotherapy(5).
The American Society of Clinical
Oncology has classified the cancer chemotherapeutic
drugs in four categories of high, moderate, low, and
minimal emetogenecity, depending on their emetogenic
potential (Table I)(1,2).
Table I
Risk of Emesis with Chemotherapeutic Drugs and Recommended Treatment for Chemotherapy-induced
Nausea and Vomiting(1)
Emetic Risk |
Chemotherapeutic Drug |
Anti-emetic
Schedule |
High (> 90%) |
Cisplatin, Mechlorethamine, Streptozotocin,
|
5-HT3 serotonin |
|
Dacarbazine, Carmustine, Dactinomycin |
receptor antagonist: Day 1 |
|
Cyclophosphamide (>1500 mg/m2) |
Dexamethasone: Days 1-4 |
|
|
Aprepitant: Days 1-3 |
Moderate (30 to 90%) |
Oxaliplatin, Cytarabine (> 1000 mg/m2),
Carboplatin, |
5-HT3 serotonin |
|
Ifosfamide, Cyclophosphamide < 1500 mg/m2, |
receptor antagonist: Day 1 |
|
Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin, Epirubicin,
Idarubicin, |
Dexamethasone: Day 1 (2, 3)* |
|
Irinotecan |
(Aprepitant: Days 1, 2, 3) |
Low (10% to 30%) |
Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, Mitoxantrone, Topotecan,
|
Dexamethasone: Day 1 |
|
Etoposide, Pemetrexed, Methotrexate, Mitomycin,
|
|
|
Gemcitabine, Cytarabine (< 1000 mg/m2),
|
|
|
Fluorouracil, Bortezomib, Cetuximab,
Trastuzumab |
|
Minimal (< 10%) |
Bevacizumab, Bleomycin, Busulfan, Fludarabine,
|
Prescribe as needed |
|
Vincristine, Vinorelbine, Vinblastine, |
|
|
2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine, Rituximab |
|
Pathophysiology
Chemotherapeutic drugs can cause
nausea and vomiting by several mechanisms. They act
by causing irritation of the mucosal lining of the
stomach and duodenum, which stimulates certain
nerves that activate the vomiting center (VC) and
the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CTZ) in the brain
which leads to vomiting. They can also activate the
CTZ by causing intestinal obstruction, delayed
gastric emptying, or inflammation. Therefore, CINV
involves coordination of several organs of the
gastrointestinal tract, the peripheral and central
nervous systems(5). Historically, there were only
two neurotransmitter receptors (dopamine D2 and
cannabinoid-1) that were the known targets for
antiemetic therapy. Major advances in the management
of chemotherapy-induced emesis were seen with the
introduction of 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor
antagonists, which included ondansetron, tropisetron,
dolasetron, and granisetron. However, these agents
offer limited protection in the acute phase of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, with
little or no effect over the delayed phase.
Recently, selective inhibitors of substance P
(Neurokinin1 (NK1) receptor antagonists) and also
some newer 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have shown
promising activity in the management of delayed
phase of CINV(6). Among the NK1 receptor
antagonists, aprepitant has been approved for the
treatment of CINV. Currently, several other NK1
receptor antagonists, including casopitant,
vestipitant, netupitant, and SCH619734 are
undergoing clinical evaluation for the prevention of
CINV in patients with a variety of malignancies.
Traditional Drugs for CINV
Management
The key to effective control of
nausea and vomiting is to prevent it before it
occurs whenever possible. That is why medicines for
nausea and vomiting are started before the
chemotherapy is given. Anti-emetic drugs may be used
alone or in combination. The traditional drugs for
management of CINV have been the dopamine
antagonists (metoclopramide); steroids (dexamethasone),
the 5-HT3 antagonists (ondansetron) and
cannabinoids(5-7).
Dopamine antagonists
The prototype of dopamine
receptor antagonist group of drugs is metoclopramide;
other drugs being domperidone, haloperidol,
chlorpromazine, and prochlorperazine.
At higher doses, metoclopramide also acts as a
serotonin receptor antagonist. Antiemetic efficacy
with metoclopra-mide is slightly less than that seen
with the selective serotonin receptor antagonists.
Side-effects include acute dystonic reactions,
akathisia, and sedation. Domperidone does not cause
dystonia as it does not cross the blood brain
barrier. Haloperidol is rarely used in children for
CINV.
Corticosteroids
Dexamethasone (0.05-0.2 mg/kg)
and methylprednisolone (100 mg/m 2)
have a high therapeutic index when used to prevent
chemotherapy-induced emesis. They are among the most
frequently used antiemetics. The American Society of
Clinical Oncology has proposed its single-agent use
in patients receiving chemothe-rapies of low-emetic
potential. Dexamethasone is especially valuable when
administered in combi-nation with 5-HT3 serotonin
receptor antagonists. It acts by decreasing
inflammatory effects on intestinal mucosa, blocking
5-HT3 release, and by decreasing the permeability of
blood-brain barrier. Adverse effects of single
dexamethasone doses are rare, although elevations of
serum glucose levels, epigastric burning, and sleep
disturbances have been reported.
Serotonin (5-HT3) Antagonists
The traditional 5-HT3 antagonist
agents are granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron.
They are highly selective agents sharing the same
side-effect pattern, with mild headache, flushing,
and constipation, being among the most commonly
reported adverse events. In conjunction with
steroids, they have been found to be very useful for
the acute phase of CINV in association with moderate
and high emetogenic schedules. They are effective
orally as well as parenterally, the effective dose
being 5 mg/m2 for Ondansetron (maximum dose: 8 mg).
Dolasetron is another effective drug though not yet
established for pediatric use.
Benzodiazepines
Short acting benzodiazepines
including lorazepam (0.025-0.05 mg/kg) and midazolam
(0.1 mg/kg) can act as adjuncts to treatment of CINV,
especially anticipatory, by reducing anxiety and
causing sedation.
Others
Cannabinoids, both as plant
extracts (dronabinol) and as semisynthetic
agents (nabilone and levonantradol), have been found
to have antiemetic activity when used alone or in
combination with other agents. These agents cause
frequent dizziness, sedation, hypotension, and
dysphoria, especially in older adults.
In view of limited control of
CINV by the traditional group of drugs, there was a
need to discover newer and better drugs(8). The
discovery of neurokinin 1 receptor antagonists, and
also some newer 5-HT3 antagonists has led to a
better control of CINV. This review highlights some
of these drugs.
Neurokinin 1 Receptor Antagonists
Aprepitant
Aprepitant is the most widely
studied and the most commonly used drug of all the
NK1 receptor antagonists(8). Aprepitant has been
shown to inhibit both the acute and delayed emesis
induced by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic such as
cisplatin by blocking substance P landing on
receptors in the neurons. It was first approved by
the FDA in 2003 as an oral antiemetic drug.
Pharmacokinetics: Aprepitant
has an average bioavailability of 60-65% when
consumed orally, with 95% of the drug being bound to
plasma proteins. Its peak plasma concentration is
achieved about 4 hours after administration and is
mainly eliminated from body by phase I metabolism.
In vitro studies using human liver microsomes
indicate that aprepitant is metabolized primarily by
CYP3A4 with minor metabolism by CYP1A2 and CYP2C19.
The half-life ranged from approximately 9 to 13
hours. No dose adjustment is needed in renal disease
or mild to moderate hepatic insufficiency
(Child-Pugh score 5-9)(8,9).
Regimens and efficacy: It is
mainly used as a preventive add-on drug for CINV.
Many case series are available that prove the
efficacy of aprepitant in the delayed phase of CINV,
especially of the highly emetogenic chemotherapeutic
group. Aprepitant is available commercially as
capsules in bottles or blister pack (Emend, Merck,
125 mg and 80 mg capsules, INR 1150 for a pack of 3
capsules). It is given for 3 days as part of a
regimen that includes a corticosteroid and a 5-HT3
antagonist. The recommended dose of Aprepitant is
125 mg orally 1 hour prior to chemotherapy treatment
(Day 1) and 80 mg once daily in the morning on Days
2 and 3. Capsules can be stored at 20-25°C. Most of
the aprepitant studies have been conducted in adult
patients(10-15). A pilot, single-institution,
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
by Herrington, et al.(15) found that in
patients who were receiving palonosetron, aprepitant,
and dexamethasone for highly emetogenic
chemotherapy, a single dose of aprepitant displayed
similar effectiveness compared with 3-day aprepitant.
Only a few adolescent studies are available(16,17).
A clinical regimen tried effectively in adolescents
by Gore, et al.(17) is shown in Table
II. Pediatric studies are required to establish
the role of this drug in management of CINV.
Table II
Newer Regimen using Combination of Anti-emetic Drugs for CINV
|
Day 1 |
Day 2 |
Day 3 |
Day 4 |
Aprepitant* |
125
mg |
80
mg |
80
mg |
- |
Dexamethasone** |
8 mg, |
4 mg, |
4 mg, |
4 mg, |
|
oral |
oral |
oral |
oral |
Ondansetron† |
0.15 |
0.15 |
– |
– |
|
mg/kg, |
mg/kg, |
|
|
|
IV,
tid |
IV, tid |
|
|
*Administered orally 1
hour prior to chemotherapy treatment on Day 1
and in the morning on Days 2 and 3;
**Administered 30 minutes prior to
chemotherapy treatment on Day 1 and in the
morning on Days 2 through 4; †Administered 30
minutes prior to chemotherapy treatment on Day
1. |
Side effects and drug
interactions: The main reported side effects of
aprepitant are constipation, fatigue and diarrhea.
In view of its induction of various enzymes, there
is a possibility of drug interactions. Aprepitant
may interfere with the metabolism of ifosfamide as
it inhibits CYP3A4. A retrospective study of 45
patients conducted by Howell, et al.(18) has
shown an increase in the incidence of neurotoxicity
of ifosfamide with the concomitant use of aprepitant.
It should not be used with cisapride and pimozide.
Fosaprepitant
Fosaprepitant dimeglumine
(MK-0517 or L-758,298), a prodrug of aprepitant, was
developed to provide a parenteral alternative to the
orally administered aprepitant(19, 20).
Fosaprepitant is rapidly converted to aprepitant via
the action of ubiquitous phosphatases. Based on
equivalence studies, 115 mg fosaprepitant seems to
be the substitute for 125 mg orally administrated
aprepitant. Tolerability of the prodrug is no
different from the active drug. In phase I and II
trials, fosaprepitant shows efficacy, but most of
the large randomized efficacy studies have utilized
aprepitant. Fosaprepitant has recently been approved
by FDA and EMEA as an intravenous substitute for
oral aprepitant on day 1 of the standard 3-day CINV
prevention regimen, which also includes
dexamethasone and a 5-HT3 antagonist. Side effects
are similar to aprepitant with the addition of mild
venous irritation and headache. Further studies are
needed to clarify the utility of fosaprepitant in
the prevention of CINV and to clarify optimal dosing
regimens that may be appropriate substitutes for
oral aprepitant. It is not yet available
commercially.
Casopitant
It is a novel NK1 antagonist
which is scheduled to be marketed having completed
phase II and phase III trials(5). It can be
administered orally or intravenously.
Palonosetron
Palonosetron is different from
conventional serotonin receptor antagonists as it
has a longer half-life (40 hours) and also a higher
affinity for serotonin receptors(21). It is the
first agent in the class which is approved for
preventing both delayed and acute emesis induced by
moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
In a study by Grunberg, et al.(22),
a single-dose regimen of palonosetron in combination
with dexamethasone and aprepitant was found highly
effective in preventing acute and delayed emesis
following administration of moderately emetogenic
chemotherapy. In another study by Grote, et al.(23)
patients received a single intravenous dose of
palonosetron (0.25 mg on day 1 of chemotherapy),
along with 3 daily oral doses of aprepitant (125 mg
on day 1, 80 mg on days 2 and 3) and dexamethasone
(12 mg on day 1, 8 mg on days 2 and 3). The
proportion of patients with complete response (no
emesis and no rescue medication) was 88% during the
acute (0-24 hours) interval, 78% during the delayed
(> 24-120 hours) interval, and 78% during the
overall (0-120 hours post chemotherapy) interval.
More than 90% of patients during all time intervals
had no emetic episodes, and between 57% and 71% of
patients reported no nausea during each of the 5
days post chemotherapy. Multiple-day dosing of
palonosetron plus dexamethasone was safe and
effective for prevention of emesis induced by 5-day
cisplatin-based chemotherapy. There was no evidence
of cumulative toxicity when palonosetron was given
three times over 5 days.
Palonosetron represents a useful
addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for the
management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting. Further studies are needed to assess the
effectiveness of palonosetron in combination with
dexamethasone compared with that of older serotonin
receptor antagonists combined with dexamethasone,
However, palonosetron may offer advantages of
convenience over the short-acting older antagonists
due to its ability to be given as a single
intravenous dose prior to chemotherapy.
Recommendations for Preventing
CINV
The choice of antiemetic drug to
be used in a chemotherapy regimen should include not
only the chemotherapeutic drug being used but also
the possible patient characteristics and etiology of
emesis. Emphasis should be on the primary prevention
of CINV rather than its treatment. Further, the
selection of the route of administration needs to be
proper as oral drugs may be ineffective in a child
who is vomiting actively. Therefore, 24-48 hours of
parenteral drugs may help to attain good control
till such time that oral treatment can be
instituted. Recommended antiemetic regimens for
highly emetogenic chemotherapy include a 5-HT3
antagonist, and dexamethasone. (Table III).
Moderately emetogenic chemotherapy requires a 5-HT3
antagonist or corticosteroid and the various drugs
and their dose schedule is depicted in Table
III. Options for treatment of refractory CINV
include aprepitant, olanzapine, dronabinol, nabilone,
gabapentin, and casopitant; however, their efficacy
and safety needs to be established in pediatric
cancer patients.
Table III
Dose and Schedule of Antiemetics used to Prevent Emesis Induced by Antineoplastic Therapy
of High Emetic Risk (2)
Antiemetic drug |
Single dose administered before |
|
chemotherapy |
5HT3 Receptor Antagonists |
Dolasetron |
Oral: 100mg; IV: 100 mg or 1.8 mg/kg |
Granisetron |
Oral: 2 mg; IV: 1 mg or 0.01 mg/kg |
Ondansetron |
Oral: 24 mg; IV: 8 mg or 0.15 mg/kg |
Palonosetron |
IV: 0.25 mg |
Tropisetron |
Oral or IV: 5 mg |
Corticosteroids |
Dexamethasone* |
Oral: 12 mg |
NK1 Receptor Antagonists |
Aprepitant* |
Oral: 125 mg |
*These drugs can be
administered as a single oral daily dose as 8
mg on days 2-4 for Dexamethasone and 80 mg on
days 2-3 for aprepitant. For antineoplastic
drugs of moderate risk: Dexamethasone can be
used as 12 mg oral when used with aprepitant
or 8 mg IV when used without aprepitant.
Alternately Ondansetron may be used orally in
a dose of 16 mg (8 mg BD).Rest of the drug
schedule is same as for high risk. 5HT3:
5-Hydroxytryptamine; NK1: Neurokinin 1; IV:
intravenous. |
Contributors: PD
conceptualized the paper. SS, PD and DH searched the
literature and drafted the manuscript. PD and SS
provided critical comments. All authors approved the
final manuscript.
Funding: None.
Competing interest: None
stated.
Key Messages
• Antiemetics can be used
alone or in combination depending upon the
total emetic potential of the chemotherapeutic
regimen.
• Newer antiemetic drugs
such as Aprepitant have showed good potential
in adult cancer patients but more trials are
needed in children.
|
References
1. Jordan K, Sippel C, Schmoll HJ.
Guidelines for antiemetic treatment of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: past,
present and future recommendations. Oncologist 2007;
12: 1143-1150.
2. American Society of Clinical
Oncology, Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Somerfield MR, Feyer
P, Clark-Snow R, Koeller JM, et al. American Society
of Clinical Oncology guideline for antiemetics in
oncology: Update 2006. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24:
2932-2947.
3. Aapro MS, Molassiotis A, Olver
I. Anticipatory nausea and vomiting. Support Care
Cancer 2005; 13: 117–121.
4. Roila F, Donati D, Tamberi S,
Margutti G. Delayed emesis: Incidence, pattern,
prognostic factors and optimal treatment. Support
Care Cancer 2002; 10: 88–95.
5. Lohr L. Chemotherapy-induced
nausea and vomiting. Cancer J 2008; 4: 85-93.
6. Schwartberg LS.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: which
antiemetic for which therapy? Oncology (Williston
Park) 2007; 21: 946-953.
7. Jordan K, Kasper C, Schmoll HJ.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: current
and new standards in the antiemetic prophylaxis and
treatment. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 199-205.
8. Antonarakis ES, Hain RDW.
Nausea and vomiting associated with cancer
chemotherapy: drug management in theory and
practice. Arch Dis Child 2004; 89: 877-880.
9. Sarcev T, Secen N, Zaric B,
Milovancev A. Aprepitant— where do we stand in the
control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting?
J BUON 2008; 13: 333-339.
10. Oechsle K, Müller MR,
Hartmann JT, Kanz L, Bokemeyer C. Aprepitant as
salvage therapy in patients with
chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis refractory to
prophylaxis with 5-HT3 antagonists and dexamethasone.
Onkologie 2006; 29: 557-561.
11. Yeo W, Mo FK, Suen JJ, Ho WM,
Chan SL, Lau W, et al. A randomized study of
aprepitant, ondansetron and dexamethasone for
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Chinese
breast cancer patients receiving moderately
emetogenic chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat
2008; 113: 529-535.
12. Gralla RJ, de Wit R,
Herrstedt J, Carides AD, Ianus J, Guoguang-Ma J,
et al. Anti-emetic efficacy of the neurokinin-1
antagonist, aprepitant, plus 5HT3 antagonist and a
corticosteroid in patients receiving anthracyclines
or cyclophosphamide in addition to high dose
cisplatin: analysis of combined data from two phase
III randomized controlled clinical trials. Cancer
2005; 15; 104: 864-868.
13. Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM,
Herrstedt J, de Wit R, Gralla RJ, Carides AD, et
al. Combined data from two phase III trials of
the NK1 antagonist aprepitant plus a 5HT 3
antagonist and a corticosteroid for prevention of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: effect of
gender on treatment response. Support Care Cancer
2006; 14: 354-360.
14. Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS,
Poli-Bigelli S, Kim HK, Park K, Jordan K, et al.
Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a
multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with
dexamethasone, for antiemetic efficacy in high-dose
cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 1000-1006.
15. Herrington JD, Jaskiewicz AD,
Song J. Randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study
evaluating aprepitant single dose plus palonosetron
and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and
delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Cancer 2008; 112: 2080-2087.
16. Smith AR, Repka TL, Weigel BJ.
Aprepitant for the control of chemotherapy induced
nausea and vomiting in adolescents. Pediatr Blood
Cancer 2005; 45: 857-860
17. Gore L, Chawla S, Petrilli A,
Hemenway M, Schissel D, Chua V, et al.
Aprepitant in adolescent patients for prevention of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
of efficacy and tolerability. Pediatr Blood Cancer
2009; 52: 242-247.
18. Howell JE, Szabatura AH,
Hatfield Seung A, Nesbit SA. Characterization of the
occurrence of ifosfamide-induced neurotoxicity with
concomitant aprepitant. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2008;
14:157-162.
19. Navari RM. Fosaprepitant
(MK-0517): A neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist for
the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2007; 16:
1977-1985.
20. Olver IN. Prevention of
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: focus on
fosaprepitant. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2008; 4:
501-506.
21. Siddiqui MA, Scott LJ.
Palonosetron. Drugs 2004; 64: 1125-1132.
22. Grunberg SM, Dugan M, Muss H,
Wood M, Burdette-Radoux S, Weisberg T, et al.
Effectiveness of a single-day three-drug regimen of
dexamethasone, palonosetron, and aprepitant for the
prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting
caused by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
Support Care Cancer 2009; 17: 589-594.
23. Grote T, Hajdenberg J,
Cartmell A, Ferguson S, Ginkel A, Charu V.
Combination therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea
and vomiting in patients receiving moderately
emetogenic chemotherapy: palonosetron, dexamethasone,
and aprepitant. J Support Oncol 2006; 4: 403-408.
|
|
 |
|