|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57:
1177-1178 |
 |
Parental Perspectives on Remote Learning and School
Reopening
|
Utkarsh Bansal, 1* Swati Ghate,2 Piyali
Bhattacharya,3 Rajeev K Thapar4 and Piyush Gupta5
Departments of Pediatrics, 1Hind
Institute of Medical Sciences, Safedabad, Barabanki, Uttar Pradesh;
2Newton
Child Development and Support Centre, Babylon Hospital, Jaipur,
Rajasthan; 3Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical
Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh; 4Al-Falah School of Medical
Sciences and Research Centre, Dhauj, Faridabad, Haryana; and 5University
College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Delhi; India.
Email: [email protected]
|
We conducted this online survey to
assess the parental perspectives on remote learning, the associated
stress, and school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic. Of 2694
responses, 2032 (75.4%) parents perceived remote learning to be
stressful for the child and 1902 (70.6%) for the family. The mean (SD)
duration of remote learning was 3.2 (2.1) hours/day and 5.3 (1.0)
days/week. Parents from 1637 (61.7%) families reported headaches and eye
strain in children. Starting regular school was not acceptable to 1946
(72.2%) parents.
Keywords: Covid 19, Education, Online,
Pandemic, Stress.
|
W orldwide more than 1.6 billion
children in 191 countries were affected by school closures due to the
ongoing coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic [1]. Most countries
including India, limited the disruption in education by shifting to
remote learning. With re-opening in full flow, when to reopen the
schools is under increasing focus, we conducted this survey to assess
parental perspectives on remote learning as an acceptable tool for
learning, the stress perceived by them on the child and the family, and
their willingness regarding school reopening.
We designed and disseminated a questionnaire on
Google Forms, to the teacher groups associated with the Indian
Academy of Pediatrics, with a request to share it with the parent
groups. Parents across India, whose children were receiving remote
learning and who agreed to participate were included. Parents of
children with special educational needs were excluded. The responses
were received between 17-31 July, 2020. Information was obtained about
the type of school and class of the child, remote learning mode, the
source used, and duration of remote learning in hours per day and days
per week. Parental perception of stress due to remote learning was also
collected. Any physical or psychological problem developed during the
period, and their willingness to send children to the school, if it
reopens, were also collected.
Out of the 2694 respondents, 2383 (88.5%) were from
urban areas; 2444 (90.7%) were attending private schools. The source of
remote learning was a mobile phone in 1697 (63%). An interactive, live
video class was attended by 2171 (80.6%) children. The mean (SD)
duration of remote learning was 3.2 (2.1) hours per day and 5.3 (1.0)
days per week. The advantages of remote learning (multiple responses
allowed) were listed as: safe in the pandemic (89.9%), helps to maintain
connect with school (61.6%), not losing out in studies (63.1%), and no
need to travel (38.7%). The disadvantages were listed as: causes
headache and eye strain (61.7%), does not feel like a real class
(60.4%), no physical activity involved (59.5%), hard to maintain
concentration (57.1%), needs home environment adjustments (40.8%), and
an extra financial burden (30.3%).
Remote learning was perceived to be stressful for the
child by 2032 (75.4%) parents while 1902 (70.6%) felt it is stressful
for the family. The problems which children developed: eye problems
(44.8%), irritability and behavioural issues (42.7%), disturbed sleep
(41.8%), headache (34.8%), weight gain (32.5%), decreased appetite
(16.7%), bodyache (13.7%) and change in bowel habit (12.7%). Overall,
1946 (72.2%) parents were not ready for school reopening soon.
Similar to a previous survey from US [2] reporting
56% of parents complaining about the affection of the emotional
well-being of their children and 52% of the family; parents in this
study perceived stress badly. We found the duration of remote learning
was higher than that suggested in the Pragayta guidelines and could be
an important source of stress not only to the child but also the family
(Table I). It may lead to prolonged screen time, increased
demand, and sharing of devices and data among the family members.
Table I Remote Learning Duration Frequency in Different Grades (N=2694)
Grades |
N |
Duration |
Frequency |
|
|
h/d |
d/wk |
Pre-primary (<6y) |
210 |
1.7 (1.6) |
4.7 (1.3) |
Primary (Grades I-V) |
113 |
2.7 (2.0) |
5.1 (1.1) |
Upper primary (Grades VI-VIII) |
590 |
3.6 (1.7) |
5.4 (1.0) |
Secondary (Grades IX-X) |
498 |
4.1 (2.3) |
5.6 (1.0) |
Higher secondary (Grades XI-XII) |
266 |
4.3 (2.0) |
5.5 (1.0) |
All values in mean (SD); Maximum duration as per Pragyata [3]
guidelines (h/d); Pre-primary – 0.5, primary and upper primary –
1-1.5; secondary and above – 2-3. |
In June, 2020, a survey [4] showed that 86% of
parents believed schools should be opened only; when there would be no
new cases for 21 days, or a vaccine has already been introduced. The
proportion of parents against the reopening of school may be declining,
yet 72% of parents of our study still don’t want to send their children
to school. This suggests that parents might be getting adjusted to the
situation or accepting the situation as the new normal. It has been
indicated that COVID-19 illness is less severe in children [5], but the
effect of school reopening on children and the community is yet to be
seen practically in our country.
Our study had several limitations. Respondents were
mainly city-dwellers, and educated parents whose children are studying
in private schools offering online remote learning. We did not collect
information on additional private tuition/coaching classes. Perceptions
of older children and adolescents would have provided a more
comprehensive picture but was not collected. Despite these, we conclude
that majority of parents were not ready to send their children to school
till the risk of COVID-19 pandemic abates in the country. As most of the
remote learning is being conducted on-screen, newer methods need to be
explored that do not involve prolonged screen hours.
Ethics clearance: Institutional ethics committee
of Hind Institute of Medical Sciences; IEC/IRB No.
HIMS/IRB/2020-21/1094, dated July 16, 2020.
Contributors: SG, UB: conceptualized the study;
UB, SG, PG: devised the methodology and wrote the protocol; UB, SG, PB,
RKT: collected data and reviewed the literature. PG, UB: analyzed the
data. UB with RKT and PB wrote the first draft. Final manuscript was
edited by PG and SG. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing interest: None
stated.
REFERENCES
1. United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization. COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response.
2020. Available from: https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse.
Accessed 29 June 2020.
2. National Parents Union. Parent Poll: Worries Spike
over Mental Health. National Parents Union - Coronavirus Impact Survey.
June, 2020. Available from: https://nationalparentsunion.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/NPU-Week-8-Topline.pdf.
Accessed 18 July 2020
3. Ministry of Human Resource and Development,
Government of India [14 July 2020]. Pragyata Guidelines for Digital
Education. Department of School Education and Literacy. Available from:
https://www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/pragyata_guidelines_0.pdf.
Accessed 16 July 2020.
4. LocalCircles. Majority parents don’t want schools
to reopen till there are no cases for 21 days in their district and its
vicinity. June 6, 2020. Available from:
https://www.localcircles.com/a/press/page/school-reopening-survey#.XzGQ5igzbIW.
Accessed: 27 June 2020.
5. Castagnoli R, Votto M, Licari A, Brambilla, I,
Bruno R, Perlini S, et al. Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) infection in children and adolescents: a
systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2020. [Epub ahead of print, April 22,
2020].
|
|
 |
|