|
Indian Pediatr 2020;57: 301-304 |
 |
Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 12
to 18 Months of Corrected Age in Preterm Infants Born Small for
Gestational Age
|
Srinivas Murki, Venkat Reddy Kallem,
Jaishree Gururaj, Tanveer Bashir, Tejo Pratap Oleti and Sai Kiran
From Department of Neonatology, Fernandez Hospital,
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Srinivas
Murki, Chief Neonatologist, Fernandez hospital, Hyderabad, Andhra
Pradesh, India. Email:
[email protected]
Received: November 14, 2018; Initial
review: June 06, 2019; Accepted: November 21, 2019.
Published online: February 5, 2020.
PII: S097475591600136
|
Objective: To compare
the growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 12 to 18
months of corrected age in preterm infants (gestation < 35
wks) born appropriate for gestation (AGA) with those born
small for gestation (SGA). Methodology:
This cross sectional, study assessed the growth outcomes in
terms of underweight, stunting, microcephaly, overweight and
obesity. Development delay was defined as developmental
quotient < 70 on DASII. Results: Out of 178
infants enrolled in the study 119 were AGA and 59 were SGA.
The mean gestational age of the study cohort was 30.45
(2.08) weeks. More infants in the SGA group were underweight
(59.3% vs. 37.8%, RR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.16-2.74), stunted
(62.7% vs. 30.25%, RR: 2.19, 95% CI: 1.42-3.36) and had
higher incidence of motor (6.7% vs.0.8%, RR: 2.5, 95% CI:
1.5-4.1) and mental development (3% vs. 0, RR: 3.1, 95% CI:
2.5-3.8) delay. Conclusion: Preterm SGA
infants are at an increased risk of underweight, stunting,
motor and mental development delay when compared with
preterm AGA infants in early childhood. Keywords:
Obesity, Development quotient, Stunting, Underweight.
Keywords: Anticonvulsant, Management, Seizure
control, Therapeutic levels.
|
The rate of preterm birth ranges from 5% to 18% and India is the biggest
contributor to the world’s prematurity burden [1]. Neonates born preterm
are more susceptible to growth and neurodevelopmental abnormalities when
compared with neonates born at term gestation [2,3]. Preterm neonates
who are SGA at birth are at double jeopardy because of their shortened
gestation period and growth restriction [4]. A higher incidence of
prenatal and perinatal complications, as well as lower cognitive scores
and poorer growth during first years of life, has been reported in
preterm small for gestation age (SGA) infants compared with those born
appropriate for gestational age (AGA) at birth. This study was designed
to assess the growth and neurodevelopment outcomes in preterm SGA
infants (gestation <35 week) in comparison to their AGA counterparts
when assessed at 12 to 18 months of corrected age.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in
the outpatient follow-up clinic of Fernandez hospital, Hyderabad after
obtaining clearance from ethical committee and informed written consent
from one of the parents. The study was conducted over a period of 2
years from May, 2016 to May, 2018. All preterm infants (till 34 6/7 days
of gestation) born after May, 2015 with a corrected age of 12-18 months
were eligible for enrollment. AGA and SGA were categorized based on
infant’s birthweight falling between 10th and 90th percentile and less
than 10th percentile for gestational age on Fernandez growth charts [5],
respectively. Infants with major congenital malformations were excluded
from the study. The antenatal, perinatal and neonatal details of
enrolled infants were collected in a predesigned proforma from the
discharge summary, computerized database and case files. Feeding details
during the first 6 months and that of complementary feeding were
collected from the parents by asking direct or leading questions. A list
of eligible infants was prepared from the existing computer database and
parents of these infants were contacted on phone (maximum of 3
reminders) for a scheduled visit when they attained a corrected age of
12 months. During the visit growth was assessed by measuring weight,
length, head circumference and mid upper arm circumference. These
measurements were analyzed using WHO AnthroPlus software [6].
Developmental assessment was by Developmental Assessment Scale for
Indian Infants (DASII) by a certified pediatrician blinded to the
baseline neonatal variables. Tone abnormalities were identified by
detailed neurological examination of the child and neurosensory
evaluation by a need for hearing aids and need for visual aids or
blindness in one or both eyes.
Assuming the incidence of
malnutrition to be (weight deviation for age > 2 z score from the
reference mean for age) 40% in preterm SGA group and 20% in preterm AGA
group [7], with an alpha error at 5% and a desired power set at 80%,
with 2:1 ratio of AGA to SGA infants, the required sample size was 116
infants in the AGA group and 58 infants in the SGA group.
Statistical analyses: All the data was analyzed using software SPSS
ver.20. Data was expressed as mean (with standard deviation) and
proportions as appropriate. Chi square test and student t test were
applied for qualitative and quantitative data respectively. A P-value of
<0.05 was considered significant.
Incidence of undernutrition
(underweight) defined as weight/age Z score >2 standard deviations below
the reference mean (WHO Growth charts) [8] for that age and sex was the
primary study outcome. Incidence of stunting (length/age Z-score
£-2.00), wasting (weight/length Z-score £-2.00), microcephaly (head
circum-ference/age Z-score £-3.00), overweight (Body mass index
(BMI)/age between 85-95 percentile) and obesity (Body mass index
(BMI)/age ³95 percentile) and incidence of developmental delay defined
as Motor Developmental quotient and mental developmental quotient <70
were the secondary study outcomes.
Results
During the study period, 610 infants were eligible for enrollment in
the study but only 178 infants could be enrolled in the study. Of the
178 infants enrolled in the study, 119 infants were AGA and 59 infants
were SGA at birth. Table I provides the baseline
characteristics for the study population. Most neonatal morbidities were
similar in infants of both the groups. The duration of exclusive breast
feeding was similar between both groups, but complementary feeding was
initiated one month earlier in SGA infants.
Table I Baseline Variables In Preterm Small for Gestational Age Babies (N=178)
Variable |
Overall (n=178) |
AGA group (n=119) |
SGA group (n=59) |
P-Value |
Gestation (wk)# |
30.4 (2.08) |
30.1 (2.15) |
31.0 (1.80) |
0.006 |
Birth weight (g)# |
1242.1 (354.4) |
1349.7 (355.1) |
1025.0 (234.6) |
<0.001 |
Birth length (cm)# |
38.2 (3.2) |
39.0 (3.0) |
36.5 (3.0) |
<0.001 |
Head circumference (cm)# |
27.4 (2.1) |
27.7 (2.2) |
26.6 (1.7) |
<0.001 |
Male sex (%) |
95 (53.4) |
65 (54.6) |
30 (54.2) |
0.63 |
Multiple pregnancy (%) |
50 (28) |
42 (35.3) |
8 (13.5) |
0.002 |
Neonatal seizures (%) |
5 (2.8) |
2 (1.6) |
3 (5) |
0.19 |
Culture positive sepsis (%) |
44 (24.7) |
26 (21.8) |
18 (30.5) |
0.20 |
hsPDA (%) |
35 (19.6) |
25 (21) |
10 (16.9) |
0.52 |
NEC IIA or more (%) |
9 (5) |
2 (1.6) |
7 (11.8) |
0.004 |
ROP requiring treatment (%) |
4 (2.2) |
4 (3.3) |
0 (0) |
– |
BPD (%) |
17 (9.5) |
11 (9.2) |
6 (10.1) |
0.84 |
Cystic PVL (%) |
3 (1.6) |
3 (2.5) |
0 |
0.21 |
IVH grade 3 or more (%) |
2 (1.1) |
2 (1.7) |
0 |
– |
Time to reach full feeds (d) # |
7.8 (5.4) |
6.6 (4.8) |
10.3 (5.8) |
<0.001 |
Time to regain birth weight (d) # |
13.0 (4.79) |
14.0 (4.55) |
10.9 (4.6) |
<0.001 |
Duration of hospitalization (d) # |
26.6 (21.3) |
27.1 (22.1) |
34.6 (18.9) |
0.02 |
Duration of exclusive breast feeding (mo) # |
3.6 (2.2) |
3.5 (2.3) |
3.8 (2.0) |
0.37 |
Initiation of complementary feeding (mo)# |
6.96 (0.95) |
7.12 (0.92) |
6.64 (0.96) |
0.002 |
hsPDA: Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus; NEC: Necrotizing enterocolitis: ROP: Retinopathy of prematurity; BPD: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia; IVH: Intraventricular hemorrhage; PVL: Periventricular leukomalacia; #Mean (SD). |
The mean corrected age at follow up
in the study population was 14.4 months. Table II
provides the outcomes for the study population. More infants in
the SGA group were underweight (59.3% and 37.8%, RR: 1.57 and CI
1.15 - 2.14) and stunted (62.7% and 30.25%, RR: 2.07 and CI
1.48-2.90) when compared to AGA infants. Frequency of wasting
(17.6% and 22.03% RR: 1.25 and CI 0.67-2.3), microcephaly (8.4%
and 8.4%, RR: 1.0 and CI 0.36-2.81) and overweight (5.8% and
3.3% RR: 0.57 and CI 0.12-2.68) were similar in both AGA and SGA
groups. Adjusting for birth gestation, gender, multiple
pregnancy, mode of delivery and resuscitation at birth SGA
independently predicted long term undernutrition (odds ratio:
2.5, 95%CI: 1.25-5). Infants in the SGA group had significantly
lower motor and mental developmental quotients when compared to
infants of AGA group.
Table II Growth and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Small for Gestational Age Infants
at the Corrected Age of 12-18 Month
Variable |
Overall (n=178) |
AGA group (n=119) |
SGA group (n=59) |
P value |
Age at follow up (mo)# |
14.4 (2.2) |
14.4 (2.3) |
14.4 (2.1) |
0.99 |
Weight (kg)# |
8.5 (1.4) |
8.8 (1.5) |
7.8 (1.0) |
<0.001 |
Length (cm)# |
74.2 (4.8) |
75.1 (4.9) |
72.4 (4.0) |
<0.001 |
Head circumference (cm)# |
44.0 (1.7) |
44.4 (1.7) |
43.3 (1.5) |
<0.001 |
Underweight (%) |
80 (45) |
45 (37.8) |
35 (59.3) |
0.007 |
Wasting (%) |
34 (19.1) |
21 (17.6) |
13 (22.03) |
0.48 |
Stunting (%) |
73 (41.01) |
36 (30.25) |
37 (62.7) |
<0.001 |
Microcephaly (%) |
15 (8.4) |
10 (8.4) |
5 (8.4) |
0.98 |
Mean BMI (kg/m2)# |
15.3 (1.3) |
15.5 (1.4) |
14.9 (1.1) |
0.004 |
Overweight (%) |
9 (5.0) |
7 (5.8) |
2 (3.3) |
0.47 |
Obesity (%) |
2 (1.1) |
2 (1.6) |
0 (0) |
0.31 |
Mean MUAC (cm)# |
12.5 (1.1) |
12.7 (1.1) |
12.2 (0.9) |
0.002 |
Mean motor age (mo)# |
13.5 (2.6) |
13.7 (2.6) |
13.0 (2.5) |
0.1 |
Mean motor developmental quotient# |
93.1 (9.5) |
94.5 (8.3) |
90.2 (11.2) |
0.005 |
MoDQ <70 (%) |
5 (2.8) |
1 (0.8) |
4 (6.7) |
0.02 |
MoDQ 71-85 (%) |
20 (11.2) |
12 (10) |
8 (13.5) |
0.48 |
MoDQ >85 (%) |
153 (85.9) |
106 (89) |
47 (79.6) |
0.09 |
Mean mental age (mo)# |
13.7 (2.6) |
13.9 (2.6) |
13.1 (2.4) |
0.048 |
Mean mental developmental quotient# |
94.7 (8.6) |
96.6 (7.9) |
90.8 (8.8) |
<0.001 |
MeDQ <70 (%) |
3 (1.6) |
0 (0) |
3 (5.0) |
0.03 |
MeDQ 71- 85 (%) |
19 (10.6) |
10 (8.4) |
9 (15.2) |
0.16 |
MeDQ >85 (%) |
156 (87.6) |
109 (91.5) |
47 (76.2) |
0.005 |
Tone abnormalities (hyper/hypotonia) (%) |
39 (22) |
27 (22.6) |
12 (20.3) |
0.72 |
W/A: weight for age; L/A: length for age; HC/A: head circumference of age; W/L: weight for length; BMI: Body massindex; MUAC: Mid upper arm circumference; MUAC/A: Mid upper arm circumference for age; MoDQ: Motor developmental quotient; MeDQ: Mental developmental quotient; #Mean (SD). |
Discussion
The present study observed that preterm SGA infants were at
higher risk for underweight, stunting, motor and mental
developmental delay when compared with preterm AGA infants at
corrected age of 12 to 18 months. The observations on the
nutritional status reported in the present study are similar to
that reported by Sharma, et al. [9] but different from that
reported by Mukhopadhyay, et al. [10]. The differences in the
incidence of long term growth outcomes between the studies is
mainly due to the differences in study population, age at
assessment and reference standards [11]. In a meta- analysis
[12] of 19 birth cohorts from low and middle income countries it
was noted that 12-60 months age, preterm SGA infants had the
highest odds of stunting (4.51; 3.42, 5.93), wasting (4.19;
2.90-6.05) and underweight (5.35; 4.39-6.53).
In a
prospective cohort study from northern India [12] that reported
neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year of corrected age, in
preterm (£34 wk/infants <1500 g), it was noted that average
motor and mental scores were similar between preterm AGA and SGA
infants. In a study [14] that compared the neurodevelopmental
outcomes of 45 preterm (<34 weeks) SGA infants with 46 preterm
AGA infants matched for gender and gestation (±2 weeks) at 1
year of corrected age, the incidence of motor (2.7% vs. 8.3%)
and mental developmental delay (18.9% vs. 16.7%) was similar
between the SGA and AGA preterm infants, respectively. In a
review [15] that reports the effect of gestation on long term
neurodevelopmental outcomes of SGA/IUGR infants, preterm SGA
infants were at higher risk of adverse neuromotor, cognitive,
behavioral and scholastic achievement compared with preterm
non-SGA infants. Studies of preterm infants revealed that IQ
scores were on average approximately 5 to 7 points (0.5 SD)
lower for preterm SGA infants compared with preterm AGA infants
[19]. The observations of the latter studies are similar to the
observations in the present study.
The main limitation
of the present study is its cross-sectional design. However, the
strength lies in the standardized protocol used to evaluate
growth and neurodevelopment outcomes.
Preterm SGA infants
are at an increased risk of underweight, stunting and lower
motor and mental development scores when compared to AGA infants
at a corrected age of 12 to 18 months. This suggests that
preterm SGA infants probably need more intense follow-up and
early and appropriate interventions to improve their outcomes.
Contributors: VRK: data collection, analysis and prepared
the manuscript; SK: data collection and data analysis and review
of manuscript; JG, TB: development assessment and data
collection; SM: preparation of protocol, analysis, writing and
review of manuscript.
Funding: None; Competing Interest:
None stated.
What
This Study Adds?
• This study highlights
the vulnerability of preterm SGA infants for poor growth
and neurodevelopmental outcomes compared to preterm AGA
infants.
|
REFERENCES
1. WHO. Preterm birth [Internet]. WHO. [cited 2018 Feb 16].
Available from:
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs363/en/. Accessed
February 16, 2018.
2. Bocca-Tjeertes IFA,
Kerstjens JM, Reijneveld SA, de Winter AF, Bos AF. Growth and
predictors of growth restraint in moderately preterm children
aged 0 to 4 years. Pediatrics. 2011;128:e1187-94.
3.
Moreira RS, Magalhães LC, Alves CRL. Effect of preterm birth on
motor development, behavior, and school performance of
school-age children: A systematic review. J Pediatr (Rio J).
2014;90:119-34.
4. Regev RH, Reichman B. Prematurity and
intrauterine growth retardation-double jeopardy? Clin Perinatol.
2004;31:453-73.
5. Kandraju H, Agrawal S, Geetha K,
Sujatha L, Subramanian S, Murki S. Gestational age-specific
centile charts for anthropometry at birth for South Indian
infants. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:199-202.
6. WHO | WHO
Anthro (version 3.2.2, January 2011) and macros [Internet]. WHO.
Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/software/en/.
Accessed Novem-ber 08, 2018.
7. Lakshmi CVS, Pramod G,
Geeta K, Subramaniam S, Rao MB, Kallapur SG, et al. Outcome of
very low birth weight infants with abnormal antenatal Doppler
flow patterns: A prospective cohort study. Indian Pediatr.
2013;50:847-52.
8. WHO. WHO Child Growth Standards:
Methods and development [Internet]. WHO. Available from:
http://www.who.int/childgrowth/ standards/ technical_report/en.
Accessed November 08, 2018.
9. Sharma PK, Sankar MJ,
Sapra S, Saxena R, Karthikeyan CV, Deorari A, et al. Growth and
neurosensory outcomes of preterm very low birth weight infants
at 18 months of corrected age. Indian J Pediatr.
2011;78:1485-90.
10. Mukhopadhyay K, Mahajan R, Louis D,
Narang A. Longitudinal growth of very low birth weight neonates
during first year of life and risk factors for malnutrition in a
developing country. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:278-81.
11.
Sania A, Spiegelman D, Rich-Edwards J, Hertzmark E, Mwiru RS,
Kisenge R, et al. The contribution of preterm birth and
intrauterine growth restriction to childhood undernutrition in
Tanzania. Matern Child Nutr. 2015;11:618-30.
12.
Christian P, Lee SE, Donahue Angel M, Adair LS, Arifeen SE,
Ashorn P, et al. Risk of childhood undernutrition related to
small-for-gestational age and preterm birth in low- and
middle-income countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1340-55.
13. Mukhopadhyay K, Malhi P, Mahajan R, Narang A.
Neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcome of very low birth
weight babies at corrected age of 2 years. Indian J Pediatr.
2010;77:963-7.
14. Padilla N, Perapoch J, Carrascosa A,
Acosta-Rojas R, Botet F, Gratacós E. Twelve-month
neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants with and without
intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Paediatr.
2010;99:1498-503.
15. Shah P, Kingdom J. Long-term
neurocognitive outcomes of SGA/IUGR infants. Obstet Gynaecol
Reprod Med. 2011;21:142-6.
|
|
 |
|