|
Indian Pediatr 2014;51: 299-302 |
 |
Pediatric and Adolescent Pheochromocytoma:
Clinical Presentation and Outcome of Surgery
|
Anjali Mishra, Prateek Kumar Mehrotra, Gaurav Agarwal,
Amit Agarwal and Saroj Kanta Mishra
From Department of Endocrine Surgery, Sanjay Gandhi
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, UP, India.
Correspondence to: Dr Anjali Mishra, Additional
Professor, Department of Endocrine Surgery, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate
Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli Road, Lucknow 226 014, India.
Email: [email protected]
Received: May 22, 2013;
Initial review: June 06, 2013;
Accepted: February 4, 2014.
|
Objectives: To describe the clinical presentation and outcome of
surgery in children with pheochromocytoma in a tertiary care
hospital in India.
Methods: Clinical records of
24 children who were operated between January 1990 and January 2011
were reviewed. The diagnosis of familial disease was established
based on clinical examination and follow-up events.
Results: Familial, bilateral,
extra-adrenal and malignant pheochromocytoma were observed in 20.8%,
20.8%, 12.5% and 4.2% children, respectively. Median follow-up
duration was 36 months. Persistent hypertension was noted in 12.5%
patients and similar proportion died in follow-up.
Conclusions: In the absence
of routine genetic screening, good history and long- term follow up
are essential to rule out familial pheochromocytoma.
Keywords: Adrenal medullary tumor,
Secondary hypertension.
|
Pheochromocytoma (PCC) is an exceptionally rare
neoplasm in children, accounting for 1% of pediatric hypertensive
patients [1]. Approximately 20% of PCC are found in the pediatric
population [2,3]. PCC can arise either from adrenal or extra-adrenal
ganglion. Tumors arising from the adrenal gland are known as PCC and
those from the extra-adrenal locations are called PGL or paraganglioma
[4]. Alhough there is some consistent literature about their clinical
presentation, long term follow-up studies on pediatric PCC are not
available [2,5-10]. The recently delineated genetic screening strategies
are often not within reach of the general population in developing
countries [11,12]. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical
presentation and outcome of surgery in children with PCC presenting at a
tertiary care center in a developing country.
Methods
Clinical records of 24 children (aged
£18 years) with PCC,
who were operated between January 1990 and January 2011 were reviewed.
Follow-up status of those who had dropped out from follow-up was
obtained by sending letters or telephoning the family and the referring
physician.
The biochemical diagnosis of PCC was established by
24-hour urinary metanephrine levels. Urinary metanephrines were measured
by Column chromatography method (Bio-rad USA) before the year 2005 and
later by ELISA technique (Labor Diagnostika Nord GmbH & Co. Nordhorn,).
The upper reference values for metanephrine and nor-metanephrine < 350
and < 600 µg /d, respectively. After confirming biochemical diagnosis
tumor localization is done and unless contraindicated, contrast enhanced
computerized tomography (CECT) is the preferred modality in our
institute. Pre-operative I 131-Meta-Iodo-Benzyle-Guanidine
(MIBG) study is not performed routinely. Screening for familial disease
was done by family history- taking, and investigating for other
components of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Syndrome-2A and 2B (MEN-2A
and MEN-2B), Neurofibromatosis and Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) syndrome.
Serum calcitonin estimation (Ct), thyroid ultrasonography, serum calcium
(Ca) and parathormone (PTH) estimation is done in all cases. All
children were pre-operatively prepared with alpha-blockers (prazocin/phenoxybenzamine)
with adequate fluid and salt replacement. Beta-blockers were added three
days prior to surgery or earlier in case tachycardia or arrhythmias were
observed. Additional anti-hypertensive medications were added, if
required. Intra-operative hemodynamic fluctuations were taken care of
with intravenous sodium nitoprusside, esmolol, noradrenaline, dopamine,
and crytalloid/ colloid infusion. Metanephrines estimation was
repeated on 7th to 10th
postoperative day. In case the post-operative values were abnormal or
equivocal, a repeat measurement was done after six weeks; otherwise
annual urinary metanephrines estimation was done to detect the recurrent
disease. On follow-up, a detailed clinical examination was performed,
particularly to look for familial syndromes and in known cases of MEN 2
syndrome, annual serum Ct, Ca and PTH estimations were done. If
metanephrines were found raised I131-MIBG
scanning and/or was performed to localize the disease.
Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software
version 13.0. Mann-Whitney and Chi-squared tests were used where
applicable and 2-tailed P values of less than 0.05 were
considered significant.
Results
The proportion of pediatric PCC in our center was 16%
(24/150). Among familial group, two had MEN-2A and one had MEN-2B
syndromes with co-existent medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Child with
MEN-2B was normotensive and PCC was diagnosed by routine biochemical
screening. Two other children with bilateral adrenal PCC on follow-up
were found to have a sibling each who also had adrenal PCC. One of these
children had presented with synchronous bilateral PCC and other with
metachronous bilateral PCC after 9 years of follow-up. All the
extra-adrenal PCC were located in the abdomen. The lone malignant tumor
was located in the organ of Zukerkandl and was metastatic (liver) at
presentation.
Characteristics of children with PCC are summarized
in Table I. The findings in familial and sporadic groups
were comparable. A total of 29 tumours were removed from 24 children.
Only one child received phenoxybenzamine whereas all the others received
prazocin for pre-operative preparation. Laparoscopic resection was
successful in a quarter of cases. Total adrenalectomy was performed in
all but one child with bilateral PCC where cortical sparing
adrenalectomy was done. There was no peri-operative mortality.
TABLE I Comparison of Familial and Sporadic Pediatric Pheochromocytoma
|
All Subjects (n=24) |
Familial (n=5) |
Sporadic (n=19) |
P value* |
Age |
16.0; 14.2 (4.5) |
18.0; 13.7 (5.3) |
16.0; 14.1 (4.3) |
0.47 |
Male : Female |
12:12 |
2:3 |
10:9 |
0.61 |
Duration of Symptoms, months |
6.0; 11.0 (13.5) |
5.0; 20.5 (26.5) |
9.0; 8.9 (9.0) |
0.27 |
Clinical Presentation, n (%)
|
Hypertension
|
23 (95.8) |
04 (80) |
19 (100) |
0.46 |
Presence of triad*
|
13 (54.2) |
03 (60) |
10 (52.6) |
0.76 |
History of hypertensive
crisis
|
04 (16.7) |
02 (40) |
02 (10.5) |
0.18 |
Seizures
|
05 (20.8) |
01 (20) |
04 (21.0) |
0.95 |
Retinopathy |
11 (44) |
01 (20) |
01 (05.3) |
0.42 |
Hypertension, n (%) |
Sustained
|
05 (20) |
- |
05 (26.3) |
0.32 |
Paroxysmal |
08 (32) |
01 (20) |
07 (36.8) |
|
Sustained with paroxysm |
10 (45.8) |
03 (60) |
07 (36.8) |
|
Normotensive |
01 (04.2) |
01 (20) |
- |
|
Metanephrines, µg/day
|
1210.0;
|
1130.0; |
3475; |
0.21 |
|
2626.1 (2212.8) |
2432.8 (2292.8) |
3656.7 (1664) |
|
Tumours, n (%) |
Extra-adrenal |
03 (12.5) |
- |
03 (15.8) |
0.8 |
Bilateral |
05 (20.8) |
03 (60) |
02 (10.5) |
0.06 |
Mailgnant |
01 (04.2) |
- |
01 (05.3) |
0.62 |
Surgical approach, n (%) |
Open |
14 (58.3) |
02 (40) |
12 (63.1) |
0.29 |
Laparoscopic
|
|
06 (25.0) |
01 (20) |
05 (26.3) |
Laparoscopic converted to
open |
07 (29.2) |
02 (40) |
02 (10.5) |
|
Tumour size
|
5.2; 6.0 (1.8) |
5.1; 5.9 (0.9) |
6.0; 6.0 (2.0) |
0.46 |
Tumour weight
|
36.5; 54.4 (52.1) |
38.0; 38.4 ( 28.4) |
28.0; 58.6 (56.6) |
0.39 |
Persistent hypertension, n (%) |
03 (12.5) |
01 (20) |
02 (10.5) |
0.52 |
** Classical symptoms triad:
headache, sweating and palpitation; All values in median; mean
(SD). |
The mean (SD) follow-up period was 43.2 (50.2) months
36. All except three children had amelioration of hypertension.
Among those with persistent hyper-tension, two had raised and one
normalized post-operative metanephrines levels. Raised metanephrines
levels were observed in cases of malignant PCC and the child who had
undergone cortical sparing surgery. The child with malignant PCC was
advised 131 I- MIBG therapy
however, parents couldn’t afford it due to the cost. All children
but one had amelioration of retinopathy and seizers after surgery. Three
children died in follow-up; one each due to metastatic PCC, metastatic
MTC and suspected Addisonian crisis 24, 60, and 5 months after surgery,
respectively.
Discussion
Clinical presentation of pediatric PCC and incidence
of bilateral PCC in the current study was in accordance with the
published literature [3,5-10]. However, incidence of familial disease,
extra-adrenal PCC and malignancy was low and mean tumor size was more in
our study. We could find only two studies published such from India so
far [9,10]. Centers, that routinely perform genetic testing
report high incidence of familial pediatric PCC that ranges from 30-70%
[1,2,8,11,12]. Restricted availability and affordability of genetic
testing are the main reasons for low incidence of familial PCC in our
study. Low incidence of malignancy and extra-adrenal PCC seem to be
inter-related as extra-adrenal PCC are more likely to be malignant than
adrenal PCC. However, the reason for diagnosing lesser number of
extra-adrenal PCC by Indian centers is difficult to explain [9,10].
Surgery results in cure of hypertension in most of
the children and laparoscopic surgery can be offered to a select group
of pediatric patients [2,11-13]. Delay in surgical intervention leads to
persistent hypertension due to irreversible changes in renal or
peripheral vasculature [2]. To circumvent the morbidity of bilateral
adrenalectomy, Cortical sparing adrenalectomy is being offered to the
patients with bilateral PCC, but long-term results of this procedure are
not available [1,11-13]. Majority of our patients presented with large
tumor and hence were not candidate for this procedure. PCC in general
are radio- and chemo-resistant tumors. 131I-
MIBG therapy has also not been found to be very effective. Surgical
resection, if feasible, remains the mainstay of treatment of metastatic
disease as well [1,14].
The two main limitations of the current study are the
possibility of underestimating incidence of genetic disease because
routine genetic screening was not performed, and secondly, the short
duration of follow-up. Familial PCC may sometimes take a decade to
manifest, as was also evident in one of our cases. We had earlier
reported clinicopathological profile of 5 pediatric PCC [15]. In the
subsequent decade we managed 19 more patients. With dedicated follow-up
of these patients we could detect two familial cases. Despite all the
limitation and for the fact that mean tumor size was large in our
series, the outcome of surgery in our study was comparable to the
previous reports.
Early diagnosis and intervention are important for
the successful management of this rare pediatric neoplasm. Routine
genetic screening of these children is mandatory for the detection and
timely management of familial PCC. However, importance of good history
taking and long- term follow up cannot be overemphasized. These children
should be managed by a multidisciplinary team consisting of
pediatricians, endocrinologists, endocrine surgeons, genetic counselors
and anaesthetists, who have experience in managing these cases on
regular basis.
What this Study Adds?
• Familial cases of pheochromocytoma are
common; family screening and long-term follow up is important.
|
References
1. Armstrong R, Sridhar M, Greenhalgh KL, Howell L,
Jones C, Landes C, et al. Phaeochromocytoma in children. Arch Dis
Child. 2008;93:899-904.
2. Caty MG, Coran AG, Geagen M, Thompson NW. Current
diagnosis and treatment of pheochromocytoma in children. Experience with
22 consecutive tumors in 14 patients. Arch Surg. 1990;125:978-81.
3. Ludwig AD, Feig DI, Brandt ML, Hicks MJ, Fitch ME,
Cass DL. Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of
pheochromocytoma in children. Am J Surg. 2007;194: 792-6.
4. Delellis RA, Llyod RV, Heitz PU, Eng C, eds.
Pathology and genetics of tumors of endocrine organs Lyon, France: IARC
Press.
5. Reddy VS, O’Neill JA, Jr., Holcomb GW 3rd, Neblett
WW 3rd, Pietsch JB, Morgan WM, 3rd, et al. Twenty-five-year
surgical experience with pheochromocytoma in children. Am Surg.
2000;66:1085-91.
6. Ciftci AO, Tanyel FC, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N.
Pheochromocytoma in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36:447-52.
7. Kim HY, Lee HS, Jung SE, Lee SC, Park KW, Kim WK.
Experience with surgical excision in childhood pheochromocytoma. J
Korean Med Sci. 2004;19:401-6.
8. Pham TH, Moir C, Thompson GB, Zarroug AE, Hamner
CE, Farley D, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in
children: a review of medical and surgical management at a tertiary care
center. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1109-17
9. Bhansali A, Rajput R, Behra A, Rao KL, Khandelwal
N, Radotra BD. Childhood sporadic pheochromocytoma: clinical profile and
outcome in 19 patients. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2006;19:749-56.
10. Ganesh HK, Acharya SV, Goerge J, Bandgar TR,
Menon PS, Shah NS. Pheochromocytoma in children and adolescents. Indian
J Pediatr. 2009;76:1151-3
11. Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, Bornstein SR,
Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Grossman AB, et al. Pheochromocytoma:
Recommendations for Clinical Practice from the First International
Symposium. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007;3:92-102.
12. Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP, Athyros VG,
Harsoulis F. Pheochromocytoma: an update on genetics and management.
Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14:935-56.
13. Petri BJ, van Eijck CH, de Herder WW, Wagner A,
de Krijger RR. Phaeochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas. Br J
Surg. 2009;96:1381-92.
14. Khafagi FA, Shapiro B, Fischer M, Sisson JC,
Hutchinson R, Beierwaltes WH. Phaeochromocytoma and functioning
paraganglioma in childhood and adolescence: role of iodine 131
metaiodobenzylguanidine. Eur J Nucl Med. 1991;18:191-8.
15. Misra AK, Mishra A, Agarwal G, Agarwal A, Bhatia
V, Mishra SK. Pheochromocytoma in children and adolescents: an
institutional experience. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:51-7.
|
|
 |
|