|
Indian Pediatr 2012;49: 330-331
|
 |
Should We Screen Children with Severe Acute
Malnutrition for Celiac Disease?
|
Praveen Kumar, Kirtisudha Mishra, Preeti Singh and Kiran Rai
From Department of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran
Children’s Hospital, Lady Hardinge Medical College,
New Delhi 110001, India.
Email:
[email protected]
|
Abstract
The clinical features of severe acute malnutrition
(SAM) often overlap with the common manifestations of celiac disease. In
this observational pilot study, 76 children fulfilling the case
definition of SAM were investigated for celiac disease, tuberculosis and
HIV. Celiac disease was diagnosed in 13.1% of SAM children while
tuberculosis and HIV were diagnosed in 9.3% and 4%, respectively.
Key words: Severe acute malnutrition, Celiac disease
|
Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) afflicts nearly 6.4% of children below
60 months of age in India [1]. Celiac disease is an immune-mediated
enteropathy that occurs in genetically susceptible individuals. The
clinical features of CD such as diarrhea, failure to thrive, vomiting,
abdominal distension, anaemia and weight loss overlap with the common
manifestations of children with SAM [2].Considering the increasing
reports of high prevalence of CD among the children of North India, it
could also be a major contributor or co-morbid condition in children
with SAM [3-7]. The diagnosis of CD has management implication as SAM
with CD will need gluten free foods during rehabilitative phase. There
is little information currently available regarding the prevalence of CD
among children with SAM.
This study was a prospective observational study
which included 76 consecutive children of either gender, aged 9–59
months admitted in pediatric ward of a tertiary care hospital and
meeting the case definition of severe acute malnutrition (
weight-for-length/height <-3 SD and/or, bi-pedal edema and / or mid arm
circumference <11.5 cm) between April 2010 to February 2011. Children
with known chronic medical or surgical disorders and known celiac
serology or HIV status were excluded. After informed consent they were
screened for celiac disease (ELISA based anti tissue transglutaminse {tTG}
with a kit sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 96%), HIV and
tuberculosis. Ethical clearance was taken from the institutional ethical
committee. All patients with positive celiac serology were subjected to
endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. Histopathology was expressed according to
Marsh classification [8]. Subjects were diagnosed as CD when both Anti
tTG was positive and biopsy showed partial or total villous atrophy
along with increased intraepithelial lymphocytes [5].
Out of a total 76 children enrolled (42 male and 34
female) CD was diagnosed in 10 (13.1%; 95% CI 6.49 - 22.87) subjects.
Mean age of presentation of patients with CD was 36.3±16 months with
male to female ratio of 2.3:1. The mean weight for height (W/Ht) Z score
of the subjects with CD was -4.5±1.7 and the height for age (Ht/age) Z
score was -2.4±2.5 as compared to –4.5±1.0 and -3.8±1.9, respectively in
SAM children without CD. 7 (9.3%) had TB (pulmonary TB 4, tubercular
meningitis 2, disseminated TB 1) and 3 (4%) had positive HIV serology.
The clinical features of SAM children with CD and without CD are
highlighted in Table 1. Clinical features of both group
were similar except for abdominal distension (P=0.04). Our study
highlights higher prevalence of CD in SAM as compared to reported
prevalence of CD around 1% in general population. Further distinction
between celiac and non-celiac patients was difficult on clinical
grounds; with abdominal distension being the only parameter higher in CD
patients.
TABLE I Comparison of Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Features between Patients with
Celiac Disease and rest of the Study Group
Characteristics
|
SAM* |
SAM |
P
|
|
with |
without |
value
|
|
CD†
|
CD
|
|
|
(n=10)
|
(n=66)
|
|
Male, Female (ratio) |
7, 3 (2.3:1) |
35, 31 (1.1:1) |
|
Persistent/chronic diarrhoea |
7(70%) |
36(54.5%) |
0.36 |
Acute diarrhoea |
4(40%) |
14(21.2%) |
0.19 |
Abdominal distension |
4(40%) |
9(13.6%) |
0.04 |
Vomiting |
5(50%) |
37(56.1%) |
0.72 |
Loss of appetite |
7(70%) |
50(75.8%) |
0.69 |
Exclusive BF‡ till 6 months |
4(40%) |
33(50%) |
0.56 |
Age of introduction of CF§ |
|
|
0.46 |
6 months |
1(10%) |
16(24.2%) |
|
7-9 months |
5(50%) |
16(24.2%)
|
|
9-12 months |
4(40%) |
15(22.7%) |
|
Not started |
0 |
18(27.3%) |
|
Anemia (Hb<10g/dL) |
8(80%) |
37(56.1%) |
0.15 |
Mean (SD) Hb (g/dL) |
8.8(1.7) |
9.4(2.9) |
0.56 |
*SAM=
Severe Acute Malnutrition;†CD= Celiac Desease; ‡BF=Breast
feeding; §CF=Complementary Feeding. |
Our study has the limitation of a small sample size,
being conducted in a tertiary hospital and included extremely
malnourished children with W/H below –4 SD. Further studies with
adequate number of cases from community will be needed to document the
true association. Considering that there is no previous similar study
our results highlight importance of identifying this subset of SAM, as
the management for this subset of patients has to be gluten-free
diet-based nutritional rehabilitation.
References
1. International Institute for Population Sciences.
National Family Health Survey 3, 2005-6. Mumbai. India: International
Institute of Population Sciences, 2006.
2. Garcia-Manzanares A, Lucendo AJ. Nutritional and
dietary aspects of celiac disease. Nutri Clin Pract. 2011;26:163-73.
3. Sood A, Sood N, Midha V, Avasthi G, Sehgal A.
Prevalence of celiac disease among school children in Punjab, North
India. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:1622-5.
4. Patwari AK, Anand VK, Kapur G, Narayan S. Clinical
and nutritional profile of children with celiac disease. Indian Pediatr.
2003;40:337-42.
5. Yachha SK. Celiac disease: India on the global
map. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 21:1511-3.
6. Poddar U, Thapa BR, Nain CK, Prasad A, Singh K.
Celiac disease in India: are they true cases of celiac disease? J
Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2002;35:508-12.
7. Kumar M, Yaccha SK, Naik SR. Celiac disease in
children. Indian J Gastroenterol. 1993;12:15.
8. Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The
histopathology of celiac disease: time for a standardized report scheme
for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999;11:1185-94.
|
|
 |
|